Coupled chemistry kinetics demonstrate the utility of functionalized Sup35 amyloid nanofibrils in biocatalytic cascades.
Amyloid
/ chemistry
Biocatalysis
Biotechnology
Enzymes, Immobilized
/ chemistry
Kinetics
Models, Molecular
Nanostructures
/ chemistry
Oxidation-Reduction
Peptide Termination Factors
/ chemistry
Protein Aggregates
Protein Structure, Secondary
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
/ chemistry
Xylose
/ metabolism
aldose sugar dehydrogenase
amyloid
beta-xylosidase
enzyme kinetics
fusion protein
protein aggregation
protein chimera
protein engineering
protein nanofibrils
xylan
xylanase
Journal
The Journal of biological chemistry
ISSN: 1083-351X
Titre abrégé: J Biol Chem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985121R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 10 2019
11 10 2019
Historique:
received:
14
03
2019
revised:
14
08
2019
pubmed:
17
8
2019
medline:
9
6
2020
entrez:
17
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Concerns over the environment are a central driver for designing cell-free enzymatic cascade reactions that synthesize non-petrol-based commodity compounds. An often-suggested strategy that would demonstrate the economic competitiveness of this technology is recycling of valuable enzymes through their immobilization. For this purpose, amyloid nanofibrils are an ideal scaffold to realize chemistry-free covalent enzyme immobilization on a material that offers a large surface area. However, in most instances, only single enzyme-functionalized amyloid fibrils have so far been studied. To embark on the next stage, here we displayed xylanase A, β-xylosidase, and an aldose sugar dehydrogenase on Sup35(1-61) nanofibrils to convert beechwood xylan to xylonolactone. We characterized this enzymatic cascade by measuring the time-dependent accumulation of xylose, xylooligomers, and xylonolactone. Furthermore, we studied the effects of relative enzyme concentrations, pH, temperature, and agitation on product formation. Our investigations revealed that a modular cascade with a mixture of xylanase and β-xylosidase, followed by product removal and separate oxidation of xylose with the aldose sugar dehydrogenase, is more productive than an enzyme mix containing all of these enzymes together. Moreover, we found that the nanofibril-coupled enzymes do not lose activity compared with their native state. These findings provide proof of concept of the feasibility of functionalized Sup35(1-61) fibrils as a molecular scaffold for biocatalytic cascades consisting of reusable enzymes that can be used in biotechnology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31416835
pii: S0021-9258(20)34954-1
doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.008455
pmc: PMC6791322
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amyloid
0
Enzymes, Immobilized
0
Peptide Termination Factors
0
Protein Aggregates
0
SUP35 protein, S cerevisiae
0
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins
0
Xylose
A1TA934AKO
Banques de données
PDB
['2Z79', '4EKJ', '2G8S']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14966-14977Informations de copyright
© 2019 Schmuck et al.
Références
Biotechnol Adv. 2016 Nov 15;34(7):1260-1274
pubmed: 27620948
Nanoscale. 2016 Mar 21;8(11):6071-8
pubmed: 26932320
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Jan 10;14(1):1232-77
pubmed: 23306150
J Biol Chem. 2006 Oct 13;281(41):30650-9
pubmed: 16864586
Nat Commun. 2017 Sep 12;8(1):521
pubmed: 28900095
J Biotechnol. 2006 Nov 10;126(3):304-12
pubmed: 16769147
Arch Microbiol. 2019 Mar;201(2):163-170
pubmed: 30539263
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2014 Dec;174(8):2702-10
pubmed: 25224913
Enzyme Microb Technol. 2017 Aug;103:1-11
pubmed: 28554379
Biotechnol Adv. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6):1219-27
pubmed: 22138412
Metab Eng. 2012 May;14(3):261-9
pubmed: 21946161
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017 Feb;15(2):83-95
pubmed: 27941816
Biotechnol J. 2017 Jun;12(6):null
pubmed: 28371185
Chembiochem. 2010 Jan 4;11(1):67-70
pubmed: 19918830
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 16;99(8):5253-60
pubmed: 11959975
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 May;35(5):377-391
pubmed: 18338189
Nat Nanotechnol. 2011 Jul 31;6(8):469-79
pubmed: 21804553
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2015 Nov;177(5):1152-63
pubmed: 26289020
ChemCatChem. 2014 Jul;6(7):1961-1968
pubmed: 25937845
J Biotechnol. 2007 May 31;130(1):95-105
pubmed: 17445930
Chem Soc Rev. 2013 Aug 7;42(15):6437-74
pubmed: 23436023
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011 Jun 24;4(1):18
pubmed: 21702938
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017 Jan 28;27(1):77-83
pubmed: 27666987
Chemistry. 2009;15(5):1107-14
pubmed: 19072950
ChemCatChem. 2017 Dec 8;9(23):4328-4333
pubmed: 30519367
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 23;13(4):e0196250
pubmed: 29684061
J Am Chem Soc. 2012 Mar 28;134(12):5516-9
pubmed: 22414276
Biotechnol Prog. 2011 Mar-Apr;27(2):360-7
pubmed: 21485029
Adv Food Nutr Res. 2016;79:179-211
pubmed: 27770861
Nat Commun. 2017 May 24;8:15526
pubmed: 28537253
Crit Rev Microbiol. 2018 Mar;44(2):244-257
pubmed: 28609211
Biochem J. 2011 Feb 15;434(1):143-51
pubmed: 21091436
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012 Dec;168(8):2218-29
pubmed: 23054825
Biotechnol J. 2015 Jan;10(1):69-82
pubmed: 25319678
Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2018;19(1):48-67
pubmed: 27670134
Trends Cell Biol. 2012 Dec;22(12):662-70
pubmed: 22841504
J Mol Biol. 2018 Oct 12;430(20):3720-3734
pubmed: 29702108
Food Chem. 2014 Apr 1;148:381-7
pubmed: 24262572
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 05;8(7):e67305
pubmed: 23861757
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012 Jun;167(3):395-411
pubmed: 22555497
Nano Lett. 2009 Jun;9(6):2246-50
pubmed: 19402649
ACS Nano. 2015 Jun 23;9(6):5772-81
pubmed: 26030507
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Oct;96(1):1-8
pubmed: 22875400
Cell. 1997 May 30;89(5):811-9
pubmed: 9182769
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014 Feb;111(2):209-22
pubmed: 24142707
ACS Nano. 2018 Sep 25;12(9):9363-9371
pubmed: 30207696
J Biol Chem. 2003 Oct 31;278(44):43717-27
pubmed: 12917441