Allometric Scaling of physiologically-relevant organoids.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 08 2019
Historique:
received: 11 01 2019
accepted: 02 08 2019
entrez: 17 8 2019
pubmed: 17 8 2019
medline: 3 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The functional and structural resemblance of organoids to mammalian organs suggests that they might follow the same allometric scaling rules. However, despite their remarkable likeness to downscaled organs, non-luminal organoids are often reported to possess necrotic cores due to oxygen diffusion limits. To assess their potential as physiologically relevant in vitro models, we determined the range of organoid masses in which quarter power scaling as well as a minimum threshold oxygen concentration is maintained. Using data on brain organoids as a reference, computational models were developed to estimate oxygen consumption and diffusion at different stages of growth. The results show that mature brain (or other non-luminal) organoids generated using current protocols must lie within a narrow range of masses to maintain both quarter power scaling and viable cores. However, micro-fluidic oxygen delivery methods could be designed to widen this range, ensuring a minimum viable oxygen threshold throughout the constructs and mass dependent metabolic scaling. The results provide new insights into the significance of the allometric exponent in systems without a resource-supplying network and may be used to guide the design of more predictive and physiologically relevant in vitro models, providing an effective alternative to animals in research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31417119
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48347-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-48347-2
pmc: PMC6695443
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

11890

Références

Acta Physiol Scand. 1961 Oct;53:114-27
pubmed: 13875747
Nature. 2009 May 14;459(7244):262-5
pubmed: 19329995
Biomaterials. 2014 Aug;35(25):6829-37
pubmed: 24875760
Cell Stem Cell. 2010 Aug 6;7(2):150-61
pubmed: 20682444
J Exp Biol. 2005 May;208(Pt 9):1575-92
pubmed: 15855389
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 7;12(3):e0173206
pubmed: 28267799
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018 Aug;75(16):2963-2980
pubmed: 29761206
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 20th Oct;129(20):2469-2475
pubmed: 27748340
Prog Neurobiol. 2011 Mar;93(3):444-55
pubmed: 21251953
Biophys J. 1962 Mar;2:213-22
pubmed: 14488987
Science. 1997 Apr 4;276(5309):122-6
pubmed: 9082983
Dev Biol. 2016 Dec 15;420(2):199-209
pubmed: 27402594
Biomaterials. 2014 Sep;35(28):8092-102
pubmed: 24965886
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40737
pubmed: 22911707
Front Pharmacol. 2018 May 18;9:508
pubmed: 29867507
Nature. 1999 May 13;399(6732):130-2
pubmed: 10335841
Cell. 2016 Jun 16;165(7):1586-1597
pubmed: 27315476
Nat Protoc. 2014 Oct;9(10):2329-40
pubmed: 25188634
Cell Stem Cell. 2015 May 7;16(5):556-65
pubmed: 25891906
Ann Hum Biol. 2013 Nov-Dec;40(6):463-71
pubmed: 23829164
Lab Chip. 2018 Oct 9;18(20):3172-3183
pubmed: 30204191
Nature. 2013 Sep 19;501(7467):373-9
pubmed: 23995685
J Surg Res. 2011 Jan;165(1):112-7
pubmed: 20080246
Brain Res Rev. 2007 Oct;55(2):422-9
pubmed: 17258321
Development. 2014 Feb;141(4):752-60
pubmed: 24496613
J Cell Mol Med. 2011 Jun;15(6):1239-53
pubmed: 21251211
Science. 2014 Jul 18;345(6194):1247125
pubmed: 25035496
Development. 2015 Sep 15;142(18):3113-25
pubmed: 26395140
Differentiation. 2012 Sep;84(2):193-202
pubmed: 22790207
Integr Biol (Camb). 2013 Sep;5(9):1149-61
pubmed: 23925524
Science. 2013 Jun 7;340(6137):1190-4
pubmed: 23744940
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 07;7:42113
pubmed: 28169362
Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2016 Mar;22(3):221-49
pubmed: 26650970
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 21;10(10):e0139345
pubmed: 26488607
Biomaterials. 2017 Nov;146:86-96
pubmed: 28898760
Trends Mol Med. 2017 May;23(5):393-410
pubmed: 28341301
Stem Cell Reports. 2017 May 9;8(5):1144-1154
pubmed: 28416282
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2014 Dec 17;2:74
pubmed: 25566537
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Jun;36(5):432-441
pubmed: 29658944
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 13;104(11):4718-23
pubmed: 17360590
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011 Mar;49(3):253-62
pubmed: 20953843

Auteurs

Chiara Magliaro (C)

Research Center "E. Piaggio", University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 1, 56122, Pisa, Italy.

Andrea Rinaldo (A)

Laboratory of Ecohydrology, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.
Dipartimento ICEA, University of Padova, via Loredan 30, 35131, Padova, Italy.

Arti Ahluwalia (A)

Research Center "E. Piaggio", University of Pisa, Largo Lucio Lazzarino, 1, 56122, Pisa, Italy. arti.ahluwalia@unipi.it.
Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Via Caruso, 16, 56122, Pisa, Italy. arti.ahluwalia@unipi.it.

Articles similaires

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages
Organoids Humans Tissue Engineering Coculture Techniques Regenerative Medicine
Killer Cells, Natural Animals Colorectal Neoplasms Decorin Adenoviridae
1.00
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Infant, Newborn Infant, Premature

Classifications MeSH