Mixed evidence for adaptation to environmental pollution.
genetic variation
meta‐analysis
phenotypic response
pollution
population persistence
resistance
selection
Journal
Evolutionary applications
ISSN: 1752-4571
Titre abrégé: Evol Appl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101461828
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
08
10
2018
accepted:
12
02
2019
entrez:
17
8
2019
pubmed:
17
8
2019
medline:
17
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Adaptation to pollution has been studied since the first observations of heavy metal tolerance in plants decades ago. To document micro-evolutionary responses to pollution, researchers have used phenotypic, molecular genetics, and demographic approaches. We reviewed 258 articles and evaluated the evidence for adaptive responses following exposure to a wide range of pollutants, across multiple taxonomic groups. We also conducted a meta-analysis to calculate the magnitude of phenotypic change in invertebrates in response to metal pollution. The majority of studies that reported differences in responses to pollution were focused on phenotypic responses at the individual level. Most of the studies that used demographic assays in their investigations found that negative effects induced by pollution often worsened over multiple generations. Our meta-analysis did not reveal a significant relationship between metal pollution intensity and changes in the traits studied, and this was probably due to differences in coping responses among different species, the broad array of abiotic and biotic factors, and the weak statistical power of the analysis. We found it difficult to make broad statements about how likely or how common adaptation is in the presence of environmental contamination. Ecological and evolutionary responses to contamination are complex, and difficult to interpret in the context of taxonomic, and methodological biases, and the inconsistent set of approaches that have been used to study adaptation to pollution in the laboratory and in the field. This review emphasizes the need for: (a) long-term monitoring programs on exposed populations that link demography to phenotypic, genetic, and selection assays; (b) the use of standardized protocols across studies especially for similar taxa. Approaches that combine field and laboratory studies offer the greatest opportunity to reveal the complex eco-evolutionary feedback that can occur under selection imposed by pollution.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31417613
doi: 10.1111/eva.12782
pii: EVA12782
pmc: PMC6691217
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
1259-1273Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.
Références
Mutat Res. 2006 Dec 1;602(1-2):121-34
pubmed: 17010391
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Aug;19(8):2536-46
pubmed: 23661315
Environ Pollut. 2011 May;159(5):1067-75
pubmed: 21071124
Mol Ecol. 2010 Dec;19(23):5186-203
pubmed: 20874759
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Feb;22(2):313-20
pubmed: 12558162
BMC Evol Biol. 2014 Dec 10;14:252
pubmed: 25491302
Science. 2011 Jun 10;332(6035):1327-30
pubmed: 21659606
Ecotoxicology. 2011 May;20(3):513-23
pubmed: 21516382
Evolution. 1995 Dec;49(6):1067-1080
pubmed: 28568521
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Feb 15;41(4):1085-96
pubmed: 17593704
Mutat Res. 2000 Jul;463(1):33-51
pubmed: 10838208
Ecotoxicology. 2012 Oct;21(7):1899-910
pubmed: 22614034
Environ Pollut. 2006 Apr;140(3):463-70
pubmed: 16202492
Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):167-78
pubmed: 18173499
Mol Ecol. 2008 Jan;17(1):108-19
pubmed: 17784915
Evolution. 2007 Dec;61(12):2925-41
pubmed: 17924954
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1991 Aug 29;333(1267):289-305
pubmed: 1682961
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Apr;22(8):6126-34
pubmed: 25395324
Ecotoxicology. 2016 Dec;25(10):1858-1866
pubmed: 27699564
Evol Appl. 2019 Apr 09;12(7):1259-1273
pubmed: 31417613
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Sep 15;42(18):6985-90
pubmed: 18853820
Environ Pollut. 2012 Mar;162:8-14
pubmed: 22243842
Evol Appl. 2012 Feb;5(2):117-29
pubmed: 25568035
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2014 Feb;33(2):453-7
pubmed: 24343919
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010 Sep;73(6):1114-22
pubmed: 20570354
Evol Appl. 2017 Apr 26;10(8):762-783
pubmed: 29151869
Evolution. 1999 Jun;53(3):826-836
pubmed: 28565631
Environ Pollut. 2006 Feb;139(3):550-60
pubmed: 16099083
Ecotoxicology. 2013 Jul;22(5):862-8
pubmed: 23821126
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Sep;22(9):2130-5
pubmed: 12959541
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 25;10(2):e0116214
pubmed: 25714492
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42497
pubmed: 22880005
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005 Sep;24(9):2341-9
pubmed: 16193764
Ecotoxicology. 2011 May;20(3):563-73
pubmed: 21336825
New Phytol. 1997 Jul;136(3):455-467
pubmed: 33863003
Evol Appl. 2017 Nov 10;10(8):745-751
pubmed: 29151867
Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:341-69
pubmed: 10761581
Environ Pollut. 2013 Jan;172:200-7
pubmed: 23063995
Environ Pollut. 2017 Jan;220(Pt B):1014-1023
pubmed: 27876417
Ecol Lett. 2007 Jan;10(1):63-76
pubmed: 17204118
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22881
pubmed: 21857962
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 19;368(1610):20120404
pubmed: 23209175
Aquat Toxicol. 2013 Nov 15;144-145:322-31
pubmed: 24211796
Ecol Lett. 2009 Sep;12(9):942-8
pubmed: 19659574
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1995 Mar;30(2):195-202
pubmed: 7539374
Science. 1988 Sep 16;241(4872):1455-60
pubmed: 3420403
Evolution. 1995 Feb;49(1):201-207
pubmed: 28593677
Science. 2001 Sep 7;293(5536):1786-90
pubmed: 11546863
Mol Ecol. 2016 Nov;25(21):5483-5499
pubmed: 27662519
Mutat Res. 2004 Aug 18;552(1-2):73-100
pubmed: 15288543
Mol Ecol. 2005 Oct;14(12):3623-42
pubmed: 16202085
Evol Appl. 2014 Jan;7(1):1-14
pubmed: 24454544
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 19;368(1610):20120080
pubmed: 23209162
Mol Ecol. 2012 Mar;21(6):1311-29
pubmed: 22269082