Progesterone - Effective for Tocolysis and Maintenance Treatment After Arrested Preterm Labour?: Critical Analysis of the Evidence.
17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate
maintenance treatment/tocolysis
preterm labour
progesterone
tocolysis
Journal
Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde
ISSN: 0016-5751
Titre abrégé: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0370732
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
07
11
2018
revised:
05
01
2019
accepted:
07
01
2019
entrez:
20
8
2019
pubmed:
20
8
2019
medline:
20
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Numerous experimental studies indicate that natural progesterone, through various mechanisms, exerts an inhibitory effect on uterine contractility and sensitises the myometrium for tocolytics. It was therefore appropriate to investigate the possible benefits of oral/vaginal progesterone and the synthetic progesterone derivative 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate, applied intramuscularly, in clinical studies on primary tocolysis, additively to established tocolytics ("adjunctive tocolysis") and as maintenance treatment after successful tocolysis in cases of threatened preterm birth. Three studies with a small number of cases do not yield any sufficient evidence for recommending progesterone/17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate as primary tocolysis in women with preterm labour. There is also no evidence that progesterone or 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate combined with commonly used tocolytics leads to a prolongation of pregnancy and a significant decrease in the rate of preterm birth. The data on the use of progesterone as maintenance treatment is controversial. While randomised, controlled studies with low quality showed promising results, studies with high quality did not reveal any significant differences with regard to the rate of preterm birth < 37 weeks of gestation, the latency period until delivery and in the neonatal outcome between progesterone/17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate and placebo or no treatment. Significant differences in the methodology, the inclusion and outcome criteria, the mode of application and the dosages of the substances as well as the inadequate statistical power as a result of low numbers of cases make interpretation and comparability of the studies difficult. Therefore, well-designed randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies with uniform primary outcome criteria are needed in order to clarify whether progesterone and via which route of administration and at which dosage is of clinical benefit for patients with manifest preterm contractions and as maintenance treatment after arrested preterm labour.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31423018
doi: 10.1055/a-0829-3992
pii: 8293992
pmc: PMC6690738
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
834-843Références
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;188(2):419-24
pubmed: 12592250
J Physiol. 1954 Nov 29;126(2):384-95
pubmed: 13222291
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1960 Jan;79:172-6
pubmed: 13825506
Reproduction. 2005 Jul;130(1):113-22
pubmed: 15985637
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):453.e1-4; discussion 421
pubmed: 17466698
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Feb;48(1):58-63
pubmed: 18275573
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991 Jul 25;40(3):203-9
pubmed: 1879595
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Oct;199(4):391.e1-7
pubmed: 18928984
Reprod Sci. 2009 Nov;16(11):1052-61
pubmed: 19602723
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May;202(5):455.e1-9
pubmed: 20452487
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Feb;97(2):149-54
pubmed: 2138496
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011 Jul;37(7):787-91
pubmed: 21395905
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Mar;285(3):585-90
pubmed: 21796421
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Jul;25(7):1156-9
pubmed: 21967664
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928
pubmed: 22008217
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;72(4):269-73
pubmed: 22086108
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;206(3):254.e1-5
pubmed: 22244470
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;206(3):206.e1-9
pubmed: 22381603
ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:607906
pubmed: 22685670
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Oct;33(7):678-81
pubmed: 24127952
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 31;(1):CD006770
pubmed: 24482121
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 May;34(4):322-5
pubmed: 24483757
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Dec;27(18):1892-6
pubmed: 24512252
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Oct;15(10):e7947
pubmed: 24693371
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Jul;126(1):60-3
pubmed: 24807871
BJOG. 2015 Jan;122(1):80-91
pubmed: 25209926
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):16-22
pubmed: 25659469
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):479-87
pubmed: 25797233
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2015 Jun;219(3):125-35
pubmed: 26114408
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;132(1):11-6
pubmed: 26489489
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 09;6:20638
pubmed: 26856618
BJOG. 2016 Nov;123(12):1990-1999
pubmed: 27028759
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;55(3):399-404
pubmed: 27343323
BJOG. 2016 Oct;123(11):1753-60
pubmed: 27550838
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128(4):e155-64
pubmed: 27661654
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;128(5):989-1000
pubmed: 27741193
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;28(6):464-469
pubmed: 27764015
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;210:217-224
pubmed: 28068594
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Sep;30(17):2011-2030
pubmed: 28482713
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;130(1):64-70
pubmed: 28594783
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 2;17(1):258
pubmed: 28768474
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018 Mar;44(3):408-416
pubmed: 29297950
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018 Jun;78(6):585-595
pubmed: 29962517
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Oct;52:126-136
pubmed: 30266582
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018 Dec;78(12):1245-1255
pubmed: 30655648
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Mar;154(3):525-9
pubmed: 3513581
Fertil Steril. 1994 Sep;62(3):485-90
pubmed: 8062942
Control Clin Trials. 1996 Feb;17(1):1-12
pubmed: 8721797
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997 Sep 26;828:291-9
pubmed: 9329850