The accuracy of endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of patterns of endometrial pathology in women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding. More conservative therapeutic approaches.
Adult
Aged
Carcinoma
/ complications
Clinical Decision-Making
Endometrial Hyperplasia
/ complications
Endometrial Neoplasms
/ complications
Endometritis
/ complications
Endometrium
/ pathology
False Positive Reactions
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
Menorrhagia
/ etiology
Metrorrhagia
/ etiology
Middle Aged
Polyps
/ complications
Predictive Value of Tests
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Journal
Saudi medical journal
ISSN: 1658-3175
Titre abrégé: Saudi Med J
Pays: Saudi Arabia
ID NLM: 7909441
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
entrez:
20
8
2019
pubmed:
20
8
2019
medline:
8
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a leading cause of hysterectomies, the cause of which is usually diagnosed with preoperative endometrial sampling. We planned this study to assess the accuracy of diagnosing the histologic patterns of endometrium in the preoperative sample in reference to the final histologic diagnosis in hysterectomy. We retrospectively reviewed medical charts between January 2011 and December 2015 at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia and identified 43 cases of AUB with complete documentation. The histologic diagnoses were classified into normal and benign pathology group (N/B), or carcinoma and hyperplasia category (Ca/H). Measures of validity were used to compare endometrial sampling histological diagnoses to diagnoses following hysterectomy and Cohen's kappa to assess for agreement between the 2 modalities. Results: The median age of all patients was 49 years. Preoperative histologic examination showed 53.8% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 70% positive predictive values and 81.8% negative predictive values, 30.1% false positive rates and 18.2% false negative rates. The agreement between preoperative and postoperative histologic diagnoses was moderate (79.1%, k=0.469). Conclusion: The accuracy of preoperative histologic examination was moderate. Our findings recommend cautious clinical decision making and limiting hysterectomy to women who do not respond to other therapeutic measures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31423519
doi: 10.15537/smj.2019.8.24449
pmc: PMC6718861
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
815-819Références
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Dec;80(12):1131-6
pubmed: 11846711
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24(3-4):330-3
pubmed: 12807251
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;196(3):243.e1-5
pubmed: 17346538
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):87-91
pubmed: 18262151
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008 Jan-Mar;9(1):89-91
pubmed: 18439083
Am Fam Physician. 2012 Jan 1;85(1):35-43
pubmed: 22230306
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Apr;289(4):845-9
pubmed: 24121689
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2013 Sep;81(9):519-24
pubmed: 24187815
J Exp Ther Oncol. 2013;10(3):165-8
pubmed: 24416990
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Nov 05;14:132
pubmed: 25370003
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Apr;40:23-43
pubmed: 27818130
Saudi Med J. 2017 May;38(5):497-502
pubmed: 28439599
Menopause. 2018 Feb;25(2):160-164
pubmed: 28763396
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):803-813
pubmed: 28885397
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:350-353
pubmed: 29665453
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2018 Sep 24;:null
pubmed: 30252729