A Meta-Analysis on the Impact of the Supplementation of Rumen-Protected Choline on the Metabolic Health and Performance of Dairy Cattle.
cow fertility
cow health
meta-analysis
milk production
rumen-protected choline
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Aug 2019
16 Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
08
07
2019
revised:
06
08
2019
accepted:
06
08
2019
entrez:
21
8
2019
pubmed:
21
8
2019
medline:
21
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
After parturition, cows undergo negative energy balance leading to fat mobilization, predisposing them to fatty liver syndrome and ketosis with major consequences for health and reproduction. Supplementation of rumen-protected choline (RPC) has attracted major research efforts during the last decade, assuming that choline improves liver function by increasing very low-density lipoprotein exportation from the liver, thereby improving metabolic profiles, milk production, and reproduction. However, the effects of RPC on production, health, and reproduction have been inconsistent. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of RPC supplementation, starting from d 20 (± 12.2) ante partum to d 53 (± 31.0) postpartum, on feed intake, milk production performance and metabolic profiles of dairy cows early postpartum. Data analyses from 27 published studies showed an increase in postpartal dry matter intake (from on average 19.1 to 19.9 kg/d;
Identifiants
pubmed: 31426430
pii: ani9080566
doi: 10.3390/ani9080566
pmc: PMC6720594
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Horizon 2020
ID : 778098
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Références
J Dairy Sci. 2000 Dec;83(12):2907-17
pubmed: 11132863
J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2003 Feb;50(1):18-21
pubmed: 12650504
J Dairy Sci. 2003 May;86(5):1722-33
pubmed: 12778583
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Oct;87(10):3105-24
pubmed: 15377589
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Jan;89(1):188-200
pubmed: 16357282
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2006 Sep 15;113(1-2):21-9
pubmed: 16740320
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Dec;89(12):4808-18
pubmed: 17106112
J Dairy Sci. 2007 May;90(5):2413-8
pubmed: 17430945
Vet J. 2008 Apr;176(1):10-20
pubmed: 18329917
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Apr;91(4):1552-9
pubmed: 18349248
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Jun;92(6):2729-36
pubmed: 19448007
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2010 Dec;94(6):e259-65
pubmed: 20455967
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Aug;93(8):3746-54
pubmed: 20655444
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Aug;94(8):4016-27
pubmed: 21787937
Vet J. 2012 Jul;193(1):140-5
pubmed: 22178357
Animal. 2008 Nov;2(11):1595-601
pubmed: 22444010
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Feb;96(2):1102-16
pubmed: 23200476
Acta Vet Hung. 2013 Mar;61(1):59-70
pubmed: 23439292
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2014;42(2):79-87
pubmed: 24737152
J Anim Sci. 2015 Apr;93(4):1896-904
pubmed: 26020212
Br J Nutr. 2016 Jul;116(1):35-44
pubmed: 27138530
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Nov;99(11):8716-8732
pubmed: 27638261
Vet World. 2016 Aug;9(8):837-41
pubmed: 27651671
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Dec;99(12):9732-9744
pubmed: 27771079
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Dec;100(12):10113-10142
pubmed: 29153158
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Dec;100(12):10353-10366
pubmed: 29153169
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Feb;101(2):1088-1110
pubmed: 29224865
J Dairy Sci. 1995 Aug;78(8):1789-801
pubmed: 8786263
J Dairy Sci. 1998 Jan;81(1):238-42
pubmed: 9493099