Virtual reality among the elderly: a usefulness and acceptance study from Taiwan.
Accidental Falls
/ prevention & control
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
/ physiology
Emotions
/ physiology
Exercise
/ physiology
Female
Humans
Intention
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
/ psychology
Pilot Projects
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Taiwan
/ epidemiology
Virtual Reality
Active aging
Older people
Technology acceptance model
Virtual reality
Journal
BMC geriatrics
ISSN: 1471-2318
Titre abrégé: BMC Geriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968548
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 08 2019
19 08 2019
Historique:
received:
13
01
2019
accepted:
18
07
2019
entrez:
21
8
2019
pubmed:
21
8
2019
medline:
26
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Virtual reality (VR) has several applications in the medical domain and also generates a secure environment to carry out activities. Evaluation of the effectiveness of VR among older populations revealed positive effects of VR as a tool to reduce risks of falls and also improve the social and emotional well-being of older adults. The decline in physical and mental health, the loss of functional capabilities, and a weakening of social ties represent obstacles towards active aging among older adults and indicate a need for support. Existing research focused on the effects of VR among older populations, and its uses and benefits. Our study investigated the acceptance and use of VR by the elderly. This pilot study was conducted on 30 older adults who voluntarily participated during March to May 2018. Nine VR applications that promote physical activities, motivate users, and provide entertainment were chosen for this study. Participants were asked to use any one of the applications of their choice for 15 min twice a week for 6 weeks. At the end of 6 weeks, participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire based on the Technology Acceptance Model and a literature review, to evaluate their acceptance of VR technology. Cronbach's alpha reliability analysis was used to test the internal consistency of the questionnaire items. Pearson's product moment correlation was used to examine the validity of the questionnaire. A linear regression and mediation analysis were utilized to identify relationships among the variables of the questionnaire. In total, six male and 24 female participants aged 60~95 years volunteered to participate in the study. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, social norms, and perceived enjoyment were seen to have had significant effects on the intention to use VR. Participants agreed to a large extent regarding the perceived usefulness, perceived enjoyment, and their experience of using VR. Thus, VR was seen to have high acceptance among this elderly population. Older people have positive perceptions towards accepting and using VR to support active aging. They perceived VR to be useful, easy to use, and an enjoyable experience, implying positive attitudes toward adopting this new technology.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Virtual reality (VR) has several applications in the medical domain and also generates a secure environment to carry out activities. Evaluation of the effectiveness of VR among older populations revealed positive effects of VR as a tool to reduce risks of falls and also improve the social and emotional well-being of older adults. The decline in physical and mental health, the loss of functional capabilities, and a weakening of social ties represent obstacles towards active aging among older adults and indicate a need for support. Existing research focused on the effects of VR among older populations, and its uses and benefits. Our study investigated the acceptance and use of VR by the elderly.
METHODS
This pilot study was conducted on 30 older adults who voluntarily participated during March to May 2018. Nine VR applications that promote physical activities, motivate users, and provide entertainment were chosen for this study. Participants were asked to use any one of the applications of their choice for 15 min twice a week for 6 weeks. At the end of 6 weeks, participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire based on the Technology Acceptance Model and a literature review, to evaluate their acceptance of VR technology. Cronbach's alpha reliability analysis was used to test the internal consistency of the questionnaire items. Pearson's product moment correlation was used to examine the validity of the questionnaire. A linear regression and mediation analysis were utilized to identify relationships among the variables of the questionnaire.
RESULTS
In total, six male and 24 female participants aged 60~95 years volunteered to participate in the study. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, social norms, and perceived enjoyment were seen to have had significant effects on the intention to use VR. Participants agreed to a large extent regarding the perceived usefulness, perceived enjoyment, and their experience of using VR. Thus, VR was seen to have high acceptance among this elderly population.
CONCLUSIONS
Older people have positive perceptions towards accepting and using VR to support active aging. They perceived VR to be useful, easy to use, and an enjoyable experience, implying positive attitudes toward adopting this new technology.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31426766
doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1218-8
pii: 10.1186/s12877-019-1218-8
pmc: PMC6699111
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
223Références
Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;44:3-34
pubmed: 10175341
Crit Care. 2003 Dec;7(6):451-9
pubmed: 14624685
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):607-18
pubmed: 16629970
Int Tinnitus J. 2006;12(1):41-4
pubmed: 17147038
J Aging Phys Act. 2007 Jan;15(1):1-12
pubmed: 17387225
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(3):289-96
pubmed: 18667809
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2010 Aug;43(4):229-34
pubmed: 20814798
Age Ageing. 2014 Mar;43(2):188-95
pubmed: 24351549
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 May;95(5):956-67
pubmed: 24389402
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Apr;26(4):615-7
pubmed: 24764645
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015 Feb;30(1):49-54
pubmed: 25107931
J Aging Health. 2015 Apr;27(3):379-402
pubmed: 25245519
Science. 2014 Oct 31;346(6209):587-91
pubmed: 25359967
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Nov 15;11:156
pubmed: 25399408
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):649-657
pubmed: 25468167
Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(11):1031-41
pubmed: 25584744
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1337:1-6
pubmed: 25773610
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Mar 03;11:557-63
pubmed: 25834437
J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Feb;10(1):103-12
pubmed: 26008207
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jul;63(7):1381-90
pubmed: 26115386
Games Health J. 2015 Oct;4(5):352-61
pubmed: 26287926
Sports Med. 2016 Sep;46(9):1293-309
pubmed: 26886474
Gerontologist. 2016 Apr;56 Suppl 2:S268-80
pubmed: 26994266
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 06;18(12):e315
pubmed: 27923778
BMJ. 2016 Dec 13;355:i6270
pubmed: 27965211
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55
pubmed: 28029643
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Aug;29(8):1283-1286
pubmed: 28878448
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Aug 26;12:1363-1370
pubmed: 28883717
Clin Gerontol. 2019 Jan-Feb;42(1):27-33
pubmed: 29505343
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Jun;65(6):527-30
pubmed: 8074626