Current practice in the management of branch retinal vein occlusion in Japan: Survey results of retina specialists in Japan.
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Clinical Competence
Disease Management
Humans
Japan
Laser Therapy
/ methods
Ophthalmologists
/ standards
Retinal Vein Occlusion
/ diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
Specialization
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tomography, Optical Coherence
/ methods
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Anti-VEGF
Branch retinal vein occlusion
Macular edema
Real practice
Retina specialist
Journal
Japanese journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1613-2246
Titre abrégé: Jpn J Ophthalmol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 0044652
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
15
11
2018
accepted:
17
06
2019
pubmed:
21
8
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
21
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To elucidate the current clinical practice patterns of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) management by retina specialists in Japan in the era of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. A voting survey using an answer pad system. On May 28, 2017, forty-one retina specialists were surveyed on the pathology and clinical practice of BRVO management. Most specialists (77.5%) use fundus examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for diagnosis of macular edema (ME) secondary to BRVO. All assess the condition of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and external limiting membrane (ELM) and consider this a visual prognostic factor. For ME secondary to BRVO, anti-VEGF therapy is the first choice, and most specialists (82.4%) select initial injection followed by a pro re nata (PRN) regimen. For switching to other treatment options for persistent cases, combination therapy of anti-VEGF injections and laser therapy is the most common choice (35.9%), whereas 25.6% select vitreous surgery and 15.4% select adding steroid injections. Our survey presents the current opinions on the diagnosis and treatment of BRVO by retina specialists in Japan, and reveals the common views about damage to the EZ/ELM as a factor of poor prognosis and anti-VEGF therapy as the first line treatment, highlighting various opinions on initiation and switching of therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31428900
doi: 10.1007/s10384-019-00685-4
pii: 10.1007/s10384-019-00685-4
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiogenesis Inhibitors
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
365-373Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2016 Sep;35(3):185-9
pubmed: 26340259
Semin Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;29(2):85-107
pubmed: 24171809
Ophthalmology. 2015 Mar;122(3):538-44
pubmed: 25315663
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;62(6):686-692
pubmed: 30328560
Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Jan;104(1):34-41
pubmed: 2417579
Ophthalmology. 1993 Mar;100(3):423-8
pubmed: 8460014
Eye (Lond). 2016 Aug;30(8):1084-90
pubmed: 27229707
Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2012 Jul;41(7):294-9
pubmed: 22892606
Ophthalmology. 2016 Feb;123(2):330-336
pubmed: 26522708
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Feb;247(2):147-63
pubmed: 19034481
Retina. 2018 Aug;38(8):1581-1587
pubmed: 28614133
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 24;53(9):5877-80
pubmed: 22836776
Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Sep 15;98(3):271-82
pubmed: 6383055
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb 17;11:369-375
pubmed: 28255227
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 28;11(4):e0153817
pubmed: 27123642
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2018 May;62(3):265-273
pubmed: 29572577
J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:251257
pubmed: 25276413
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 08;6:29445
pubmed: 27389770
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;127(9):1115-28
pubmed: 19752420
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;62(2):151-157
pubmed: 29094327
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1094-1101.e5
pubmed: 20430447
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1134-1146.e3
pubmed: 20417567
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;145(2):273-280
pubmed: 18045566
Adv Ther. 2011 Jan;28(1):28-39
pubmed: 21153509
Ophthalmology. 2011 Aug;118(8):1594-602
pubmed: 21684606
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 11;(5):CD008732
pubmed: 25961835
Ophthalmology. 2017 Dec;124(12):1778-1787
pubmed: 28807635
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Apr;36(2):438-42
pubmed: 24510511
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD009510
pubmed: 23440840
Am J Ophthalmol. 1979 Jan;87(1):65-73
pubmed: 571209
Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1332-44
pubmed: 27039022
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;56(3):250-61
pubmed: 22358585
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;131(2):160-5
pubmed: 23411880
Ophthalmology. 2010 Feb;117(2):313-9.e1
pubmed: 20022117
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0144894
pubmed: 26661582
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2012 Jul 1;8(4):274-84
pubmed: 22587512
Arch Ophthalmol. 1992 Oct;110(10):1427-34
pubmed: 1417544
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun;117(6):1102-1112.e1
pubmed: 20398941
J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Sep;8(9):1886-94
pubmed: 20492457
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jun;119(6):1175-83
pubmed: 22306121
Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:39-45
pubmed: 23308037
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Jun;51(6):3205-9
pubmed: 20071683
N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 1;331(22):1480-7
pubmed: 7526212