Availability of a simplified lung ventilation imaging algorithm based on four-dimensional computed tomography.
4DCT
Deformable vector field
Dice similarity coefficient
SPECT
Ventilation image
Journal
Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)
ISSN: 1724-191X
Titre abrégé: Phys Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 9302888
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
18
01
2019
revised:
08
07
2019
accepted:
05
08
2019
pubmed:
21
8
2019
medline:
7
2
2020
entrez:
21
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is still not conclusive which four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT)-based ventilation imaging algorithm is most accurate and efficient. In this study, we proposed a simplified algorithm (VIAAVG) which only requires the average computed tomography (AVG CT) as input, and quantitatively compared its accuracy and efficiency with three other popular algorithms. Fifty patients with lung or esophageal cancer who underwent radiotherapy were enrolled. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) ventilation images (VI-SPECT) and 4DCT were acquired 1-3 days before the first treatment session. The end of exhalation and the end of inhalation CT were registered to derive deformable vector field (DVF) using MIMvista. 4DCT-based ventilation images (CTVI) were first calculated respectively by means of four algorithms (VIAJAC, VIAHU, VIAPRO and VIAAVG). The computation times were compared using paired t-test. The corresponding CTVIs (CTVIJAC, CTVIHU, CTVIPRO and CTVIAVG) and VI-SPECT were segmented into three equal sub-volumes (high, medium and low function lung, respectively) after smoothing and normalization. The Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSCs) were calculated for each sub-volume between each CTVI and VI-SPECT. The average DSCs for high, medium and low function lung in different CTVIs for each patient were compared using paired t-test. The mean DSCs for CTVIJAC, CTVIHU, CTVIPRO and CTVIAVG were 0.3255, 0.4465, 0.5865 and 0.5958, respectively. The average computation times for CTVIJAC, CTVIHU, CTVIPRO and CTVIAVG were 18.3 s, 24.2 s, 144.8 s and 15.0 s. VIAAVG is available for clinical use because of its high accuracy, improved efficiency and less input requirement compared to the other algorithms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31430587
pii: S1120-1797(19)30186-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.08.006
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
53-58Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.