Prospective four years of evaluation of erectile function after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy using baseline IIEF-5 > 16.
IIEF-5
brachytherapy
erectile dysfunction
prostate cancer
radiation therapy
Journal
Journal of contemporary brachytherapy
ISSN: 1689-832X
Titre abrégé: J Contemp Brachytherapy
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101506276
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
05
01
2019
accepted:
30
03
2019
entrez:
23
8
2019
pubmed:
23
8
2019
medline:
23
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prostate brachytherapy (BT) is a validated treatment for localized prostate cancer (CaP) and an attractive therapy option for patients seeking to preserve erectile function (EF). The aim of this paper is to prospectively assess EF evolution during 4 years after BT. Between February 2007 and July 2012, 179 patients underwent an exclusive Iodine-125 BT, for low-intermediate favorable risk CaP of whom, 102 had an initial international index of erectile function 5 score (IIEF-5) > 16 and were included in the study. Of those, 12.7% received neo-adjuvant hormonotherapy (HT) to decrease the prostate volume. Post-BT intake of phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDE5i) was not an exclusion criterion. Erectile function was prospectively assessed using a validated questionnaire IIEF-5 before treatment and annually for 4 years. At 1-year follow-up, 54% of patients preserved an IIEF-5 > 16 and only 8% suffered from severe ED. During the next 3 years, the results were not statistically different. The mean IIEF-5 lost 4 points during the first year, 17 vs. 21, and remained stable during the following 3 years. We did not find any significant differences in the proportion of patients treated by PDE5i (18-20%). As for patients with a normal preoperative IIEF-5 (> 21) ( During the first 4 years after BT, more than half of patients maintained an IIEF-5 > 16, and EF results remained stable. Severe erectile dysfunction (ED) was very rare.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31435425
doi: 10.5114/jcb.2019.85793
pii: 36877
pmc: PMC6701385
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
195-200Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Authors report no conflict of interest.
Références
Int J Impot Res. 1999 Dec;11(6):319-26
pubmed: 10637462
J Urol. 2001 Feb;165(2):436-9
pubmed: 11176391
Int J Impot Res. 2002 Aug;14(4):245-50
pubmed: 12152112
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Nov 15;57(4):944-52
pubmed: 14575824
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jun 1;62(2):437-47
pubmed: 15890585
J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2106-31
pubmed: 17509297
BJU Int. 2007 Aug;100(2):362-7
pubmed: 17617140
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Nov 1;75(3):639-48
pubmed: 19303721
Aktuelle Urol. 2011 Jul;42(4):252-5
pubmed: 21769761
Prog Urol. 2011 Dec;21(13):932-9
pubmed: 22118358
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(2):221-5
pubmed: 22734475
J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):1014-8
pubmed: 23017516
Brachytherapy. 2013 Nov-Dec;12(6):589-95
pubmed: 23669150
Int J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct;19(5):940-5
pubmed: 24170247
Brachytherapy. 2014 Mar-Apr;13(2):163-8
pubmed: 24295963
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Jul;112(1):72-6
pubmed: 25086852
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86
pubmed: 25220842
Prog Urol. 2015 Feb;25(2):68-74
pubmed: 25497176
Strahlenther Onkol. 2016 Mar;192(3):182-9
pubmed: 26713323
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629
pubmed: 27568654
JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1141-1150
pubmed: 28324092
BJU Int. 2018 Jan;121(1):38-45
pubmed: 28670842
J Sex Med. 2017 Sep;14(9):1071-1078
pubmed: 28859870
J Sex Med. 2017 Oct;14(10):1260-1269
pubmed: 28965787
Tech Urol. 1995 Summer;1(2):72-80
pubmed: 9118374