Efficacy and retention rate of adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis patients after first-line etanercept failure: the FEARLESS cohort.
Adalimumab
/ therapeutic use
Adult
Aged
Antirheumatic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Arthritis, Psoriatic
/ drug therapy
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
/ drug therapy
Drug Substitution
Etanercept
/ therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Male
Medication Adherence
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Failure
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Adalimumab
Biological drugs
Etanercept
Psoriatic arthritis
Rheumatoid arthritis
Journal
Rheumatology international
ISSN: 1437-160X
Titre abrégé: Rheumatol Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8206885
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
23
05
2019
accepted:
08
08
2019
pubmed:
23
8
2019
medline:
10
2
2021
entrez:
23
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Few studies have compared the efficacy of switching from etanercept to adalimumab in the real-life setting in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This study evaluated the 2-year retention rate and 12-month efficacy of adalimumab in RA and PsA patients, previously treated with etanercept. RA and PsA patients from 11 Italian Rheumatology Units received adalimumab after first-line etanercept failure. Two-year adalimumab retention rate was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were developed to examine predictors of drug persistence. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were developed to examine potential predictors of 12-month DAS-28 remission. The study population included 117 RA (disease duration of 10.1 ± 7.7 years and baseline DAS28-ESR of 4.97 ± 1.3) and 102 PsA (disease duration of 7.1 ± 5.1 years and baseline DAPSA of 24.6 ± 11.8). The 2-year retention rate was 48.2% in RA and 56.5% in PsA patients. Concomitant methotrexate treatment was not associated with increased drug survival in both groups. Similarly, cause of etanercept discontinuation or treatment duration was not associated with retention rate. 12-month remission and low disease activity were achieved, respectively, in 27.3% and 23.9% of RA patients and 27.4% and 23.5% PsA of patients. In multivariate models, etanercept discontinuation due to inefficacy (OR 0.27, 95% CI 1.03-0.73; p = 0.009) and baseline DAS-28 (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29-0.69; p < 0.001) remained significant negative predictors of remission in RA patients. No variable was associated with remission in PsA patients. Adalimumab after etanercept failure was highly effective and safe in both RA and PsA patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31435754
doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04416-3
pii: 10.1007/s00296-019-04416-3
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
0
Adalimumab
FYS6T7F842
Etanercept
OP401G7OJC
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
263-272Références
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Dec;37(12):2027-2034
pubmed: 28956118
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 May;65(5):1213-23
pubmed: 23460467
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):48-55
pubmed: 23942868
Lancet. 2016 Oct 22;388(10055):2023-2038
pubmed: 27156434
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Oct 1;57(57 Suppl 7):vii42-vii53
pubmed: 30289539
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):132-7
pubmed: 23291385
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Nov;72(11):1840-4
pubmed: 23562987
Autoimmun Rev. 2017 Dec;16(12):1185-1195
pubmed: 29037899
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018 May 24;12:1421-1429
pubmed: 29872265
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Sep;53(9):1664-8
pubmed: 24729445
Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2763-2774
pubmed: 27863807
Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb;21(2):422-430
pubmed: 29082659
Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16(3):114
pubmed: 25167330
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Aug;62(8):1128-43
pubmed: 20235210
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2015 Nov;41(4):677-98
pubmed: 26476226
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May;58(5):1248-57
pubmed: 18438840
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Jul;66(7):893-9
pubmed: 17412737
Autoimmun Rev. 2010 Apr;9(6):465-9
pubmed: 20044040
JAMA. 2016 Sep 20;316(11):1172-1180
pubmed: 27654603
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1316-22
pubmed: 24550173
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Apr 15;51(2):301-2
pubmed: 15077278
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2016 Jun;12(6):651-60
pubmed: 26821681
Clin Immunol. 2009 May;131(2):308-16
pubmed: 19188093
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Apr;70(4):583-9
pubmed: 21330639
Joint Bone Spine. 2014 Jan;81(1):37-40
pubmed: 23731638
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009 May-Jun;27(3):540-1
pubmed: 19604456
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Jun;69(6):867-874
pubmed: 27696735
Autoimmun Rev. 2014 Nov;13(11):1102-8
pubmed: 25172238
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jun;74(6):1037-44
pubmed: 24550168
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018 Dec;55(3):271-294
pubmed: 28748366
Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2015 Nov;41(4):545-68
pubmed: 26476218
Adv Ther. 2018 Oct;35(10):1535-1563
pubmed: 30128641
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Sep-Oct;35(5):804-809
pubmed: 28770712
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):960-977
pubmed: 28264816
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017 Jun 28;11:1969-1978
pubmed: 28721016
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Oct;47(2):183-192
pubmed: 28413099
Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Nov;30(11):1447-54
pubmed: 21644062
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012 Dec;51(12):2204-14
pubmed: 22923753
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):96-103
pubmed: 21269578
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 May;74(5):890-6
pubmed: 24431398
Autoimmun Rev. 2018 Jan;17(1):24-28
pubmed: 29108829
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2014 Aug;47(1):6-16
pubmed: 23345026
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Mar;75(3):499-510
pubmed: 26644232
Lancet. 2009 Jul 18;374(9685):210-21
pubmed: 19560810
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Oct;66(10):1393-7
pubmed: 17613555
Joint Bone Spine. 2015 Oct;82(5):330-7
pubmed: 25864942
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Apr;68(4):432-9
pubmed: 26556048
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Jul;71(7):1134-42
pubmed: 22294625
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Jan;56(1):13-20
pubmed: 17195186