Would ivermectin for malaria control be beneficial in onchocerciasis-endemic regions?
Ivermectin
Malaria
Mass drug administration
Onchocerciasis
Vector control
Journal
Infectious diseases of poverty
ISSN: 2049-9957
Titre abrégé: Infect Dis Poverty
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101606645
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Aug 2019
23 Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
12
04
2019
accepted:
09
08
2019
entrez:
24
8
2019
pubmed:
24
8
2019
medline:
23
11
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is accumulating evidence supporting the use of ivermectin as a malaria control tool. Recent findings from the repeat ivermectin mass drug administrations for control of malaria trial demonstrated a reduced incidence of malaria in villages which received repeated ivermectin mass drug administration (MDA; six doses) compared to those who had only one round of ivermectin. Several other studies investigating the benefits of ivermectin for malaria purposes are ongoing/planned. While ivermectin MDA offers promising perspectives in the fight against malaria, we highlight the added benefits and anticipated challenges of conducting future studies in onchocerciasis-endemic regions, which are confronted with a substantial disease burden including onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy. Increasing the frequency of ivermectin MDA in such places may reduce the burden of both malaria and onchocerciasis, and allow for more entomological investigations on both the Anopheles mosquitoes and the blackflies. Upfront, acceptability and feasibility studies are needed to assess the endorsement by the local populations, as well as the programmatic feasibility of implementing ivermectin MDA several times a year. Onchocerciasis-endemic sites would doubly benefit from ivermectin MDA interventions, as these will alleviate onchocerciasis-associated morbidity and mortality, while potentially curbing malaria transmission. Involving onchocerciasis programs and other relevant stakeholders in the malaria/ivermectin research agenda would foster the implementation of pluri-annual MDA in target communities.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is accumulating evidence supporting the use of ivermectin as a malaria control tool. Recent findings from the repeat ivermectin mass drug administrations for control of malaria trial demonstrated a reduced incidence of malaria in villages which received repeated ivermectin mass drug administration (MDA; six doses) compared to those who had only one round of ivermectin. Several other studies investigating the benefits of ivermectin for malaria purposes are ongoing/planned.
MAIN TEXT
METHODS
While ivermectin MDA offers promising perspectives in the fight against malaria, we highlight the added benefits and anticipated challenges of conducting future studies in onchocerciasis-endemic regions, which are confronted with a substantial disease burden including onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy. Increasing the frequency of ivermectin MDA in such places may reduce the burden of both malaria and onchocerciasis, and allow for more entomological investigations on both the Anopheles mosquitoes and the blackflies. Upfront, acceptability and feasibility studies are needed to assess the endorsement by the local populations, as well as the programmatic feasibility of implementing ivermectin MDA several times a year.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Onchocerciasis-endemic sites would doubly benefit from ivermectin MDA interventions, as these will alleviate onchocerciasis-associated morbidity and mortality, while potentially curbing malaria transmission. Involving onchocerciasis programs and other relevant stakeholders in the malaria/ivermectin research agenda would foster the implementation of pluri-annual MDA in target communities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31439040
doi: 10.1186/s40249-019-0588-7
pii: 10.1186/s40249-019-0588-7
pmc: PMC6706915
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ivermectin
70288-86-7
Types de publication
Letter
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
77Subventions
Organisme : H2020 European Research Council
ID : 671055
Références
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1999 Feb;92(1):67-70
pubmed: 10214527
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1999 Feb;92(1):71-2
pubmed: 10214528
Parasitol Today. 1993 Mar;9(3):83-7
pubmed: 15463716
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2007 Aug 30;1(1):e72
pubmed: 17989786
J Infect Dis. 2010 Jul 1;202(1):113-6
pubmed: 20482251
Trends Parasitol. 2011 Oct;27(10):423-8
pubmed: 21727027
Acta Trop. 2012 Jan;121(1):34-43
pubmed: 22019935
J Infect Dis. 2014 Dec 15;210(12):1972-80
pubmed: 24951826
Malar J. 2015 Jun 11;14:243
pubmed: 26068560
Malar J. 2015 Dec 10;13 Suppl 1:496
pubmed: 26651335
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Nov 16;8(365):365ra157
pubmed: 27856796
Malar J. 2017 Apr 24;16(1):172
pubmed: 28438169
Malar J. 2017 Aug 15;16(1):338
pubmed: 28810866
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 23;377(21):2044-2052
pubmed: 29116890
Trends Parasitol. 2018 Mar;34(3):208-216
pubmed: 29288080
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Feb 14;12(2):e0006221
pubmed: 29444080
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Nov;18(11):1278-1286
pubmed: 30268645
Lancet. 2019 Apr 13;393(10180):1517-1526
pubmed: 30878222
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Mar 19;12(1):124
pubmed: 30890165