Use of computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of mechanical gastrointestinal obstruction in canines and felines.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
14
04
2019
accepted:
02
07
2019
entrez:
24
8
2019
pubmed:
24
8
2019
medline:
29
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objective of this study was to describe the use of computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis of mechanical gastrointestinal (GIT) obstruction in canines and felines. Medical records of 130 canines and felines that underwent an abdominal CT scan between 2013 and 2015 at a specialty referral hospital for suspected gastrointestinal tract (GIT) obstruction were reviewed. Images were evaluated by a single board-certified radiologist for the presence of foreign material, evidence of obstruction, and location of foreign material present. Confirmation of CT findings was based on surgical exploration or medical management if surgery was not indicated. Of the 97 patients that met the inclusion criteria, 48 (49.48%) had evidence of foreign material present within the GIT and 49 (50.52%) did not. Forty-one patients had evidence of mechanical gastrointestinal obstruction. Thirty-nine of these patients had an obstruction due to foreign material; one had an intussusception with no foreign material, and another had obstruction secondary to mucosal thickening. Forty-five patients underwent exploratory laparotomy, and CT findings were confirmed in all patients. The presence of a GIT obstruction was confirmed intra-operatively in 37 patients and lack of obstruction was confirmed in the remaining eight. Non-surgical medical management was pursued for the remaining patients. Based on follow-up client interviews, clinical signs resolved in all of these patients. In conclusion, computed tomography appears to be useful for the diagnosis of GIT obstruction in canines and felines and is a helpful tool for guiding the recommendation for surgical intervention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31442244
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219748
pii: PONE-D-19-10007
pmc: PMC6707543
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.8266151']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0219748Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Cape Cod Veterinary Specialist employs author Joshua Zuckerman. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Acta Radiol. 1999 Jul;40(4):422-8
pubmed: 10394872
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Jan;176(1):167-74
pubmed: 11133561
Acta Vet Hung. 2000;48(1):9-21
pubmed: 11402680
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Oct;185(4):1036-44
pubmed: 16177429
J Vet Intern Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;19(6):816-21
pubmed: 16355674
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2006 Jul-Aug;47(4):404-8
pubmed: 16863060
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2007 Sep-Oct;43(5):264-9
pubmed: 17823475
J Small Anim Pract. 2009 Nov;50(11):576-83
pubmed: 19814770
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2011 May-Jun;52(3):248-55
pubmed: 21554473
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2012 Sep-Oct;53(5):513-7
pubmed: 22612269
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2012 Nov-Dec;53(6):605-12
pubmed: 22995037
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2013 May-Jun;54(3):207-11
pubmed: 23490240
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2013 Nov-Dec;54(6):591-604
pubmed: 23919809
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2014 Sep-Oct;55(5):472-9
pubmed: 24689728
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2016 Jul;57(4):366-75
pubmed: 27038072
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2017 Aug 1;251(3):315-321
pubmed: 28703680
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Jan;162(1):37-41
pubmed: 8273686
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Dec;167(6):1451-5
pubmed: 8956576