Automated Text Messaging With Patients in Department of Veterans Affairs Specialty Clinics: Cluster Randomized Trial.


Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 08 2019
Historique:
received: 21 05 2019
accepted: 19 07 2019
revised: 12 07 2019
entrez: 25 8 2019
pubmed: 25 8 2019
medline: 21 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Acceptability of mobile phone text messaging as a means of asynchronous communication between health care systems and patients is growing. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has adopted an automated texting system (aTS) for national rollout. The aTS allows providers to develop clinical texting protocols to promote patient self-management and allows clinical teams to monitor patient progress between in-person visits. Texting-supported hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment has not been previously tested. Guided by the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM), we developed an aTS HCV protocol and conducted a mixed methods, hybrid type 2 effectiveness implementation study comparing two programs supporting implementation of the aTS HCV protocol for medication adherence in patients with HCV. Seven VA HCV specialty clinics were randomized to usual aTS implementation versus an augmented implementation facilitation program. Implementation process measures included facilitation metrics, usability, and usefulness. Implementation outcomes included provider and patient use of the aTS HCV protocol, and effectiveness outcomes included medication adherence, health perceptions and behaviors, and sustained virologic response (SVR). Across the seven randomized clinics, there were 293 facilitation events using a core set of nine implementation strategies (157 events in augmented implementation facilitation, 136 events in usual implementation). Providers found the aTS appropriate with high potential for scale-up but not without difficulties in startup, patient selection and recruitment, and clinic workflow integration. Patients largely found the aTS easy to use and helpful; however, low perceived need for self-management support contributed to high declination. Reach and use was modest with 197 patients approached, 71 (36%) enrolled, 50 (25%) authenticated, and 32 (16%) using the aTS. In augmented implementation facilitation clinics, more patients actively used the aTS HCV protocol compared with usual clinic patients (20% vs 12%). Patients who texted reported lower distress about failing HCV treatment (13/15, 87%, vs 8/15, 53%; P=.05) and better adherence to HCV medication (11/15, 73%, reporting excellent adherence vs 6/15, 40%; P=.06), although SVR did not differ by group. The aTS is a promising intervention for improving patient self-management; however, augmented approaches to implementation may be needed to support clinician buy-in and patient engagement. Considering the behavioral, social, organizational, and technical scale-up challenges that we documented, successful and sustained implementation of the aTS may require implementation strategies that operate at the clinic, provider, and patient levels. Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03898349; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03898349.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Acceptability of mobile phone text messaging as a means of asynchronous communication between health care systems and patients is growing. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has adopted an automated texting system (aTS) for national rollout. The aTS allows providers to develop clinical texting protocols to promote patient self-management and allows clinical teams to monitor patient progress between in-person visits. Texting-supported hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment has not been previously tested.
OBJECTIVE
Guided by the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM), we developed an aTS HCV protocol and conducted a mixed methods, hybrid type 2 effectiveness implementation study comparing two programs supporting implementation of the aTS HCV protocol for medication adherence in patients with HCV.
METHODS
Seven VA HCV specialty clinics were randomized to usual aTS implementation versus an augmented implementation facilitation program. Implementation process measures included facilitation metrics, usability, and usefulness. Implementation outcomes included provider and patient use of the aTS HCV protocol, and effectiveness outcomes included medication adherence, health perceptions and behaviors, and sustained virologic response (SVR).
RESULTS
Across the seven randomized clinics, there were 293 facilitation events using a core set of nine implementation strategies (157 events in augmented implementation facilitation, 136 events in usual implementation). Providers found the aTS appropriate with high potential for scale-up but not without difficulties in startup, patient selection and recruitment, and clinic workflow integration. Patients largely found the aTS easy to use and helpful; however, low perceived need for self-management support contributed to high declination. Reach and use was modest with 197 patients approached, 71 (36%) enrolled, 50 (25%) authenticated, and 32 (16%) using the aTS. In augmented implementation facilitation clinics, more patients actively used the aTS HCV protocol compared with usual clinic patients (20% vs 12%). Patients who texted reported lower distress about failing HCV treatment (13/15, 87%, vs 8/15, 53%; P=.05) and better adherence to HCV medication (11/15, 73%, reporting excellent adherence vs 6/15, 40%; P=.06), although SVR did not differ by group.
CONCLUSIONS
The aTS is a promising intervention for improving patient self-management; however, augmented approaches to implementation may be needed to support clinician buy-in and patient engagement. Considering the behavioral, social, organizational, and technical scale-up challenges that we documented, successful and sustained implementation of the aTS may require implementation strategies that operate at the clinic, provider, and patient levels.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03898349; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03898349.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31444872
pii: v21i8e14750
doi: 10.2196/14750
pmc: PMC6729116
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03898349']

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e14750

Informations de copyright

©Vera Yakovchenko, Timothy P Hogan, Thomas K Houston, Lorilei Richardson, Jessica Lipschitz, Beth Ann Petrakis, Chris Gillespie, D Keith McInnes. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 04.08.2019.

Références

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 18;17(1):497
pubmed: 28720092
Assist Technol. 1998;10(1):4-12
pubmed: 10181150
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Apr;34(4):228-43
pubmed: 18468362
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Feb 1;65(2):141-3
pubmed: 24492898
Implement Sci. 2017 May 11;12(1):60
pubmed: 28494811
Am J Med Qual. 2019 Nov/Dec;34(6):538-544
pubmed: 30675797
Telemed J E Health. 2009 Apr;15(3):231-40
pubmed: 19382860
Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26
pubmed: 22310560
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):707-13
pubmed: 20962135
Ann Fam Med. 2008 May-Jun;6(3):246-52
pubmed: 18474888
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jan;25(1):215-38
pubmed: 19210154
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29 Suppl 4:904-12
pubmed: 25355087
Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 22;6:76
pubmed: 21777479
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Feb;36(2):165-73
pubmed: 19135907
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Aug 22;6(8):e10748
pubmed: 30135050
Qual Life Res. 2009 Sep;18(7):873-80
pubmed: 19543809
Implement Sci. 2014 Apr 17;9:46
pubmed: 24742308
Gastroenterology. 2016 Jul;151(1):70-86
pubmed: 27080301
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Mar;37(6):577-88
pubmed: 11879422
Am J Health Promot. 1997 Sep-Oct;12(1):38-48
pubmed: 10170434
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:393-415
pubmed: 25785892
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):63-74
pubmed: 22230833
Implement Sci. 2006 Oct 18;1:23
pubmed: 17049080
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Nov;102(2):96-104
pubmed: 24209600
SAGE Open Med. 2018 May 17;6:2050312118773261
pubmed: 29796266
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Mar 08;8(1):235-249
pubmed: 28271121
BMJ Open. 2012 Oct 31;2(6):
pubmed: 23117563
Implement Sci. 2012 Jul 23;7:67
pubmed: 22824094
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jan;8(1):15-20
pubmed: 21318011
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21
pubmed: 25889199
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Apr 15;14:203
pubmed: 24731285
Health Informatics J. 2016 Jun;22(2):140-50
pubmed: 25038203
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 17;16(10):e222
pubmed: 25326646
Implement Sci. 2015 Oct 06;10:141
pubmed: 26443999
Am J Health Promot. 2017 Jan;31(1):67-75
pubmed: 26389975
Implement Sci. 2016 Jul 16;11:97
pubmed: 27424171
Fed Pract. 2016 Sep;33(9):14-20
pubmed: 27840570

Auteurs

Vera Yakovchenko (V)

Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States.

Timothy P Hogan (TP)

Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States.
Division of Health Informatics and Implementation Science, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.

Thomas K Houston (TK)

Division of Health Informatics and Implementation Science, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Amherst, MA, United States.

Lorilei Richardson (L)

Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States.

Jessica Lipschitz (J)

Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA, United States.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Beth Ann Petrakis (BA)

Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States.

Chris Gillespie (C)

Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States.

D Keith McInnes (DK)

Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, United States.
Department of Health Law Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH