Deep Learning Classifiers for Automated Detection of Gonioscopic Angle Closure Based on Anterior Segment OCT Images.
Journal
American journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1879-1891
Titre abrégé: Am J Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
11
04
2019
revised:
07
08
2019
accepted:
13
08
2019
pubmed:
25
8
2019
medline:
28
3
2020
entrez:
25
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To develop and test deep learning classifiers that detect gonioscopic angle closure and primary angle closure disease (PACD) based on fully automated analysis of anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT) images. Subjects were recruited as part of the Chinese-American Eye Study (CHES), a population-based study of Chinese Americans in Los Angeles, California, USA. Each subject underwent a complete ocular examination including gonioscopy and AS-OCT imaging in each quadrant of the anterior chamber angle (ACA). Deep learning methods were used to develop 3 competing multi-class convolutional neural network (CNN) classifiers for modified Shaffer grades 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4. Binary probabilities for closed (grades 0 and 1) and open (grades 2, 3, and 4) angles were calculated by summing over the corresponding grades. Classifier performance was evaluated by 5-fold cross-validation and on an independent test dataset. Outcome measures included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for detecting gonioscopic angle closure and PACD, defined as either 2 or 3 quadrants of gonioscopic angle closure per eye. A total of 4036 AS-OCT images with corresponding gonioscopy grades (1943 open, 2093 closed) were obtained from 791 CHES subjects. Three competing CNN classifiers were developed with a cross-validation dataset of 3396 images (1632 open, 1764 closed) from 664 subjects. The remaining 640 images (311 open, 329 closed) from 127 subjects were segregated into a test dataset. The best-performing classifier was developed by applying transfer learning to the ResNet-18 architecture. For detecting gonioscopic angle closure, this classifier achieved an AUC of 0.933 (95% confidence interval, 0.925-0.941) on the cross-validation dataset and 0.928 on the test dataset. For detecting PACD based on 2- and 3-quadrant definitions, the ResNet-18 classifier achieved AUCs of 0.964 and 0.952, respectively, on the test dataset. Deep learning classifiers effectively detect gonioscopic angle closure and PACD based on automated analysis of AS-OCT images. These methods could be used to automate clinical evaluations of the ACA and improve access to eye care in high-risk populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31445003
pii: S0002-9394(19)30394-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.08.004
pmc: PMC6888901
mid: NIHMS1538020
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
273-280Subventions
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : K23 EY029763
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : P30 EY029220
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : U10 EY017337
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:1727039
pubmed: 27990300
J Ophthalmol. 2012;2012:487309
pubmed: 23209880
J Glaucoma. 2013 Aug;22(6):468-72
pubmed: 23377578
JAMA. 2017 Dec 12;318(22):2211-2223
pubmed: 29234807
JAMA. 2016 Dec 13;316(22):2402-2410
pubmed: 27898976
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;17(5):321-32
pubmed: 20868259
Ophthalmology. 2011 Mar;118(3):474-9
pubmed: 21035864
Comput Biol Med. 2018 Apr 1;95:24-33
pubmed: 29433038
Ophthalmology. 2007 Mar;114(3):494-500
pubmed: 17123610
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar;208(3):472-474
pubmed: 28026206
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jun;119(6):1134-42
pubmed: 22361313
Ophthalmology. 2008 May;115(5):769-74
pubmed: 17916377
Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;95(1):46-50
pubmed: 20530187
Surv Ophthalmol. 2014 May-Jun;59(3):311-27
pubmed: 24138894
Lancet. 2019 Apr 20;393(10181):1609-1618
pubmed: 30878226
Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 Dec;112(12):1584-9
pubmed: 7993214
Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;92(12):1612-6
pubmed: 18617543
Ophthalmology. 2010 Jan;117(1):11-7
pubmed: 19815290
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003 Oct;81(5):480-5
pubmed: 14510795
J Glaucoma. 2015 Jun-Jul;24(5):e47-51
pubmed: 25264987
Curr Eye Res. 2015 May;40(5):496-500
pubmed: 24955626
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:7380-3
pubmed: 24111450
Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1389-1397
pubmed: 27707497
J Glaucoma. 2006 Dec;15(6):486-93
pubmed: 17106360
Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2081-90
pubmed: 24974815
Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb;86(2):238-42
pubmed: 11815354
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2015 Sep;37(9):1904-16
pubmed: 26353135
Ophthalmology. 2018 Jul;125(7):1110-1120
pubmed: 29482864
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2018 Nov-Dec;1(3):158-166
pubmed: 31025032
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Nov 04;52(12):8598-603
pubmed: 21948547
Cell. 2018 Feb 22;172(5):1122-1131.e9
pubmed: 29474911
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Dec;250(12):1863-8
pubmed: 22527316
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Nov 07;52(12):8672-9
pubmed: 21908580
Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;52(4):373-378
pubmed: 28774519
Ophthalmology. 2013 Jan;120(1):48-54
pubmed: 23009888
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan;157(1):32-38.e1
pubmed: 24210768
Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Apr;87(4):450-4
pubmed: 12642309
Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Oct;128(10):1321-7
pubmed: 20938002