Evaluation of algorithms for Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation: An open-access grand challenge.
Benchmark
Challenge
Multi-modality
Whole Heart Segmentation
Journal
Medical image analysis
ISSN: 1361-8423
Titre abrégé: Med Image Anal
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9713490
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
19
02
2019
revised:
03
07
2019
accepted:
22
07
2019
pubmed:
26
8
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
entrez:
26
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Knowledge of whole heart anatomy is a prerequisite for many clinical applications. Whole heart segmentation (WHS), which delineates substructures of the heart, can be very valuable for modeling and analysis of the anatomy and functions of the heart. However, automating this segmentation can be challenging due to the large variation of the heart shape, and different image qualities of the clinical data. To achieve this goal, an initial set of training data is generally needed for constructing priors or for training. Furthermore, it is difficult to perform comparisons between different methods, largely due to differences in the datasets and evaluation metrics used. This manuscript presents the methodologies and evaluation results for the WHS algorithms selected from the submissions to the Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation (MM-WHS) challenge, in conjunction with MICCAI 2017. The challenge provided 120 three-dimensional cardiac images covering the whole heart, including 60 CT and 60 MRI volumes, all acquired in clinical environments with manual delineation. Ten algorithms for CT data and eleven algorithms for MRI data, submitted from twelve groups, have been evaluated. The results showed that the performance of CT WHS was generally better than that of MRI WHS. The segmentation of the substructures for different categories of patients could present different levels of challenge due to the difference in imaging and variations of heart shapes. The deep learning (DL)-based methods demonstrated great potential, though several of them reported poor results in the blinded evaluation. Their performance could vary greatly across different network structures and training strategies. The conventional algorithms, mainly based on multi-atlas segmentation, demonstrated good performance, though the accuracy and computational efficiency could be limited. The challenge, including provision of the annotated training data and the blinded evaluation for submitted algorithms on the test data, continues as an ongoing benchmarking resource via its homepage (www.sdspeople.fudan.edu.cn/zhuangxiahai/0/mmwhs/).
Identifiants
pubmed: 31446280
pii: S1361-8415(19)30075-1
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2019.101537
pmc: PMC6839613
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101537Subventions
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : RG/16/10/32375
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0701127
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : RG/19/1/34160
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : PG/16/78/32402
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : CH/09/002/26360
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Med Image Anal. 2016 May;30:108-119
pubmed: 26917105
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Jul;48(1):140-152
pubmed: 29316024
Med Image Anal. 2017 Jan;35:159-171
pubmed: 27423113
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017 Jun 21;19:221-248
pubmed: 28301734
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2015 Oct;9351:80-88
pubmed: 26889498
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014;17(Pt 1):520-7
pubmed: 25333158
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2016 Feb;38(2):295-307
pubmed: 26761735
Heart. 2008 Jun;94(6):781-92
pubmed: 18480352
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Jul;34(7):1460-1473
pubmed: 25667349
Med Image Anal. 2022 Oct;81:102528
pubmed: 35834896
Med Image Anal. 2018 Dec;50:36-53
pubmed: 30208355
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Dec 20;15:105
pubmed: 24359544
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Jan;122(1):66-71
pubmed: 27939201
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013 Jul;32(7):1239-48
pubmed: 23475350
Med Phys. 2015 Jul;42(7):3822-33
pubmed: 26133584
Med Image Anal. 2015 Jan;19(1):187-202
pubmed: 25461337
MAGMA. 2016 Apr;29(2):155-95
pubmed: 26811173
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006 Nov;25(11):1451-61
pubmed: 17117774
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2013;16(Pt 1):187-94
pubmed: 24505665
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
pubmed: 16545965
Insights Imaging. 2011 Feb;2(1):9-24
pubmed: 22347932
J Healthc Eng. 2013;4(3):371-408
pubmed: 23965595
Med Image Anal. 2016 Jul;31:77-87
pubmed: 26999615
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Nov;37(11):2514-2525
pubmed: 29994302
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 Aug;63(8):1563-72
pubmed: 27254856