High consistency between characteristics of primary intraductal breast cancer and subtype of subsequent ipsilateral invasive cancer.


Journal

Tumori
ISSN: 2038-2529
Titre abrégé: Tumori
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0111356

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 27 8 2019
medline: 14 2 2020
entrez: 27 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is considered a morphologic precursor of invasive cancer and is often treated with adjuvant whole-breast irradiation and endocrine therapy, as if it were an invasive cancer. Our aim was to provide further support for treatment de-escalation or enrollment of such patients in active surveillance trials. We retrospectively analyzed data on patients with conservatively treated primary DCIS subsequently diagnosed with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (IBC) at 2 comprehensive breast cancer centers. From their merged databases, we identified 50 cases with full details on tumor grade, hormone receptor expression, and HER2 amplification, for both the primary DCIS and the corresponding IBC, and we assessed the similarities and differences between the two. Distributions of hormone receptors were similar in primary DCIS and IBC, while high-grade and HER2-positive status was less common in IBC than in primary DCIS. The positivity for estrogen receptors (ER) and well-differentiated or moderately differentiated morphology in the primary DCIS persisted in 90% of the matching IBC. Changes in progesterone receptor expression were slightly more common than those in ER expression. Overall consistency for the luminal-like receptors subtype was found in 90% of cases. The high consistency between the features of primary DCIS and those of subsequent IBC (in the rare but not negligible cases of local failure) should be borne in mind when considering the therapeutic options. Treatment de-escalation and accrual of patients for active surveillance trials could be appropriate for luminal-like precursors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is considered a morphologic precursor of invasive cancer and is often treated with adjuvant whole-breast irradiation and endocrine therapy, as if it were an invasive cancer. Our aim was to provide further support for treatment de-escalation or enrollment of such patients in active surveillance trials.
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed data on patients with conservatively treated primary DCIS subsequently diagnosed with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (IBC) at 2 comprehensive breast cancer centers. From their merged databases, we identified 50 cases with full details on tumor grade, hormone receptor expression, and HER2 amplification, for both the primary DCIS and the corresponding IBC, and we assessed the similarities and differences between the two.
RESULTS RESULTS
Distributions of hormone receptors were similar in primary DCIS and IBC, while high-grade and HER2-positive status was less common in IBC than in primary DCIS. The positivity for estrogen receptors (ER) and well-differentiated or moderately differentiated morphology in the primary DCIS persisted in 90% of the matching IBC. Changes in progesterone receptor expression were slightly more common than those in ER expression. Overall consistency for the luminal-like receptors subtype was found in 90% of cases.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The high consistency between the features of primary DCIS and those of subsequent IBC (in the rare but not negligible cases of local failure) should be borne in mind when considering the therapeutic options. Treatment de-escalation and accrual of patients for active surveillance trials could be appropriate for luminal-like precursors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31446852
doi: 10.1177/0300891619867845
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

64-69

Auteurs

Massimiliano Gennaro (M)

Breast Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.

Elisabetta Meneghini (E)

Analytical Epidemiology and Health Impact Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.

Paolo Baili (P)

Analytical Epidemiology and Health Impact Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.

Sara Bravaccini (S)

Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola FC, Italy.

Annalisa Curcio (A)

Breast Unit, Ospedale GB Morgagni, Forlì, AUSL Romagna, Italy.

Maria Carmen De Santis (MC)

Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.

Laura Lozza (L)

Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.

Chiara Listorti (C)

Breast Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.

Serena Di Cosimo (S)

Department of Applied Research and Technological Development (DRAST), Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Milena Sant (M)

Analytical Epidemiology and Health Impact Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.

Secondo Folli (S)

Breast Unit, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH