Four-dimensional computed tomography-based biomechanical measurements of pulmonary function and their correlation with clinical outcome for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy patients.
Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT)
biomechanical registration
functional imaging
stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
ventilation imaging
Journal
Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery
ISSN: 2223-4292
Titre abrégé: Quant Imaging Med Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101577942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
entrez:
27
8
2019
pubmed:
27
8
2019
medline:
27
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Functional image guided radiotherapy allows for the delivery of an equivalent dose to tumor targets while sparing high ventilation lung tissues. In this study, we investigate whether radiation dose to functional lung is associated with clinical outcome for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) patients. Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) images were used to assess lung function. Deformable image registration (DIR) was performed from the end-inhale phase to the end-exhale phase with resultant displacement vectors used to calculate ventilation maps. In addition to the Jacobian-based ventilation we introduce a volumetric variation method (Rv) based on a biomechanical finite element method (FEM), to assess lung ventilation. Thirty NSCLC patients, treated with SBRT, were evaluated in this study. 4DCT images were used to calculate both Jacobian and Rv-based ventilation images. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to assess the predictive power of functional metrics. Metrics were calculated over the whole lung as well as high and low ventilated regions. Ventilation in dose regions between 1 and 5 Gy had higher AUC values compared to other dose regions. Rv based ventilation imaging method also showed to be less spatially variant and less heterogeneous, and the resultant Rv metrics had higher AUC values for predicting grade 2+ dyspnea. Low dose delivered to high ventilation areas may also increase the risk of compromised pulmonary function. Rv based ventilation images could be useful for the prediction of clinical toxicity for lung SBRT patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Functional image guided radiotherapy allows for the delivery of an equivalent dose to tumor targets while sparing high ventilation lung tissues. In this study, we investigate whether radiation dose to functional lung is associated with clinical outcome for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) patients.
METHODS
METHODS
Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) images were used to assess lung function. Deformable image registration (DIR) was performed from the end-inhale phase to the end-exhale phase with resultant displacement vectors used to calculate ventilation maps. In addition to the Jacobian-based ventilation we introduce a volumetric variation method (Rv) based on a biomechanical finite element method (FEM), to assess lung ventilation. Thirty NSCLC patients, treated with SBRT, were evaluated in this study. 4DCT images were used to calculate both Jacobian and Rv-based ventilation images. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to assess the predictive power of functional metrics. Metrics were calculated over the whole lung as well as high and low ventilated regions.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Ventilation in dose regions between 1 and 5 Gy had higher AUC values compared to other dose regions. Rv based ventilation imaging method also showed to be less spatially variant and less heterogeneous, and the resultant Rv metrics had higher AUC values for predicting grade 2+ dyspnea.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Low dose delivered to high ventilation areas may also increase the risk of compromised pulmonary function. Rv based ventilation images could be useful for the prediction of clinical toxicity for lung SBRT patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31448213
doi: 10.21037/qims.2019.07.03
pii: qims-09-07-1278
pmc: PMC6685808
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1278-1287Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Med Phys. 2011 Mar;38(3):1567-78
pubmed: 21520868
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2020 Feb 11;22:1-8
pubmed: 32140574
J Clin Monit Comput. 2000;16(5-6):433-42
pubmed: 12580227
Med Phys. 2013 Oct;40(10):101701
pubmed: 24089891
Acta Oncol. 2006;45(7):818-22
pubmed: 16982545
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Oct 1;54(2):340-7
pubmed: 12243806
Med Phys. 2010 Mar;37(3):970-9
pubmed: 20384233
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Jun 1;175(11):1173-80
pubmed: 17363770
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Mar 1;70(3):685-92
pubmed: 18164849
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Sep 1;63(1):5-24
pubmed: 15963660
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jun 1;92(2):423-9
pubmed: 25817531
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jun 1;86(2):366-71
pubmed: 23474113
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Aug 21;55(16):4661-85
pubmed: 20671351
Acad Radiol. 2005 Nov;12(11):1414-22
pubmed: 16253853
Med Phys. 1999 Feb;26(2):196-9
pubmed: 10076973
Med Phys. 2016 Sep;43(9):5072
pubmed: 27587037
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jun;63(3):370-377
pubmed: 30932346
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 1;62(3):630-4
pubmed: 15936537
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Jun;91(3):415-20
pubmed: 19195730
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Mar 21;63(6):065017
pubmed: 29480158
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Sep 1;99(1):202-209
pubmed: 28816147
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Jul 15;95(4):1273-80
pubmed: 27354134
Med Image Anal. 2008 Dec;12(6):752-63
pubmed: 18501665
Acta Oncol. 2016;55(2):156-62
pubmed: 26399389
Phys Med Biol. 2004 May 7;49(9):1711-21
pubmed: 15152926
Med Phys. 2019 Mar;46(3):1198-1217
pubmed: 30575051
Acta Oncol. 2013 Oct;52(7):1405-10
pubmed: 23957564
Radiother Oncol. 2013 Jun;107(3):398-402
pubmed: 23623727
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S70-6
pubmed: 20171521