Compensatory strategy use improves real-world functional performance in community dwelling older adults.


Journal

Neuropsychology
ISSN: 1931-1559
Titre abrégé: Neuropsychology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8904467

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 27 8 2019
medline: 6 2 2020
entrez: 27 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Compensatory strategies such as assistive technology, external reminders, and environmental cues may help support instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) and independence. However, functional ability is most often evaluated in clinical settings where everyday compensation cannot be readily observed. The present study used a novel, real-world evaluation of everyday activities (prospective memory, household chores, complex IADLs, and planning tasks) to examine the impact of compensation. Fifty community dwelling older adults were recruited with cognitive status ranging from healthy to mildly impaired. Participants completed a battery of validated performance-based and cognitive tasks, an IADL questionnaire (also completed by an informant), and real-world activities carried out in their own homes. The real-world evaluation demonstrated adequate interrater reliability (intraclass coefficient = 0.92) and construct validity (r = 0.55). Compensation improved real-world task outcome on prospective memory and household chores tasks. Further, cognition emerged as a moderator between compensation and prospective memory task outcome. Participants' ratings on an IADL questionnaire were related to real-world and performance-based functioning whereas informants' ratings were related to performance-based tasks and cognition. Our results suggest that proxy measures of functional ability (i.e., performance-based, cognitive, and IADL questionnaire measures) do not fully capture the complexity of real-world performance for nondemented community dwelling older adults. Compensation appeared to improve prospective memory performance, particularly for individuals with average to low average cognitive abilities. A difference in IADL questionnaire ratings suggest that participants may be better able to judge their real-world performance than informants. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Identifiants

pubmed: 31448941
pii: 2019-49278-001
doi: 10.1037/neu0000591
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1121-1135

Subventions

Organisme : Marchionne Research Fellowship
Organisme : Russ and Anne Fuller Interdisciplinary Research Fellowship
Organisme : Burgess Brothers Memorial Scholarship
Organisme : American Psychological Association
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
Pays : United States

Auteurs

Andrew T Weakley (AT)

Air Quality Research Center.

Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe (M)

Department of Psychology.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH