Virtual Surgical Planning for Mandible Reconstruction With a Double Barrel Fibula Flap and Immediate Implant Placement.


Journal

The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed: 27 8 2019
medline: 28 4 2020
entrez: 27 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This brief clinical report describes our experience with virtual surgical planning in a case of mandibulectomy and mandibular reconstruction with a double barrel vascularized osteofasciocutaneous fibula free flap and immediate implant placement in a case of mandibular ameloblastoma. Fibular segments were positioned to obtain the best result both for masticatory function and for aesthetic facial appearance. Furthermore, in this particular case, as well as being positioned for future masticatory rehabilitation, the implants have served to stabilize the fibula segments in the reconstructive intraoperative phase. A superimposition of programed surgery and 6 months postoperative computed tomography scan was performed and results are presented.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31449213
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005842
pii: 00001665-202001000-00102
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e41-e43

Références

Bak M, Jacobson AS, Buchbinder D, et al. Contemporary reconstruction of the mandible. Oral Oncol 2010; 46:71–76.
Salinas TJ, Desa VP, Katsnelson A, et al. Clinical evaluation of implants in radiated fibula flaps. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68:524–529.
Chiapasco M, Biglioli F, Autelitano L, et al. Clinical outcome of dental implants placed in fibula-free flaps used for the reconstruction of maxillo-mandibular defects following ablation for tumors or osteoradionecrosis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17:220–228.
Qaisi M, Kolodney H, Swedenburg G, et al. Fibula jaw in a day: state of the art in maxillofacial reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74:1284.e1–1284.e15.
Freudlsperger C, Bodem JP, Engel E, et al. Mandibular reconstruction with a prefabricated free vascularized fibula and implant-supported prosthesis based on fully three-dimensional virtual planning. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25:980–982.
Markey J, Knott PD, Fritz MA, et al. Recent advances in head and neck free tissue transfer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 23:297–301.
Succo G, Berrone M, Battiston B, et al. Step-by-step surgical technique for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flap: application of digital technology in virtual surgical planning. Eur Arch Oto-rhino-laryngol 2015; 272:1491–1501.
Schmelzeisen R, Neukam FW, Shirota T. Postoperative function after implant insertion in vascularized bone grafts in maxilla and mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97:719–725.
Crosetti E, Berrone M, Battiston B, et al. New concept and technologies in mandibular reconstruction: a case report. Ann Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 1:32.
Berrone M, Crosetti E, Succo G. Repositioning template for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flaps: an alternative technique to pre-plating and virtual surgical planning. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Italica 2014; 34:278–282.
Berrone M, Aldiano C, Pentenero M, et al. Correction of a mandibular asymmetry after fibula reconstruction using a custom-made polyetheretherketone (PEEK) onlay after implant supported occlusal rehabilitation. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Italica 2015; 35:285–288.
Berrone M, Crosetti E, Tos PL, et al. Fibular osteofasciocutaneous flap in computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction: technical aspects in oral malignancies. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Italica 2016; 36:469–478.
Haddock NT, Monaco C, Weimer KA, et al. Increasing bony contact and overlap with computer-designed offset cuts in free fibula mandible reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23:1592–1595.
Chen YS, Hu KY, Lin TW. The concept of “two arches” in mandibular reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69:616–621.
Iizuka T, Häfliger J, Seto I, et al. Oral rehabilitation after mandibular reconstruction using an osteocutaneous fibula free flap with endosseous implants. Factors affecting the functional outcome in patients with oral cancer. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16:69–79.
Kumar VV, Jacob PC, Ebenezer S, et al. Implant supported dental rehabilitation following segmental mandibular reconstruction- quality of life outcomes of a prospective randomized trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44:800–810.
Fenlon MR, Lyons A, Farrell S, et al. Factors affecting survival and usefulness of implants placed in vascularized free composite grafts used in post-head and neck cancer reconstruction. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14:266–272.
Shokri T, Stahl LE, Kanekar SG, et al. Osseous changes over time in free fibular flap reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2018; 129:1113–1116.

Auteurs

Mattia Berrone (M)

Head and Neck Oncology Service, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo.
Oncology Department, University of Turin.

Erika Crosetti (E)

Head and Neck Oncology Service, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo.

Bruno Battiston (B)

Hand surgery Unit - Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy.

Giovanni Succo (G)

Head and Neck Oncology Service, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo.
Oncology Department, University of Turin.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH