Midterm Outcome of Directional Atherectomy Combined with Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Alone for Femoropopliteal Arteriosclerosis Obliterans.
Aged
Angioplasty, Balloon
/ adverse effects
Arteriosclerosis Obliterans
/ diagnostic imaging
Atherectomy
/ adverse effects
Beijing
Cardiovascular Agents
/ administration & dosage
Chronic Disease
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
Female
Femoral Artery
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Intermittent Claudication
/ diagnostic imaging
Ischemia
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Popliteal Artery
/ diagnostic imaging
Prospective Studies
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Access Devices
Vascular Patency
Journal
Annals of vascular surgery
ISSN: 1615-5947
Titre abrégé: Ann Vasc Surg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8703941
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
13
03
2019
revised:
24
05
2019
accepted:
04
06
2019
pubmed:
27
8
2019
medline:
25
8
2020
entrez:
27
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The "leave nothing behind" strategies have been becoming a popular treatment for femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans. Atherectomy before drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty may have an advantage in improving the efficiency of drug delivery into the blood vessel wall. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of directional atherectomy combined with DCB angioplasty with DCB angioplasty alone in the treatment of femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans. Patients with femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans who received endovascular therapy from June 2016 to June 2018 in our hospital and presented with life-limiting claudication or severe chronic limb ischemia comprised the study cohort. The patients were randomized to receive directional atherectomy combined with DCB angioplasty (n = 45) or DCB alone (n = 49). Ninety-four patients were enrolled in our study with 72 males, and the mean age was 67 ± 10 years. The mean lesion length was 112 ± 64 mm. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of patients and lesions between the 2 randomized groups (P > 0.05). Flow-limiting dissections occurred more frequently in the DCB group (n = 12; 24.5%) than in the DA-DCB group (n = 2; 4.4%; P = 0.006). The technical success rate in the DA-DCB group was superior to that in the DCB group (95.6% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.006). The mean follow-up duration was 16.7 ± 6.1 months in the DCB group and 15.3 ± 5.8 months in the DA-DCB group. No amputations were performed. The overall mortality in the DCB group was 4.1% (2/49), while all patients survived in the DA-DCB group. The 12-month and 24-month primary patencies in the DA-DCB group were greater than those in the DCB group (80.5% vs. 75.7% and 67.1% vs. 55.1%, respectively); however, using all available patency data, no significant differences over time were observed (P = 0.377). In this study, directional atherectomy combined with DCB angioplasty can decrease the flow-limiting dissection rate in the treatment of femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans compared with DCB angioplasty alone. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of primary patency rate which was needed to be further clarified.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The "leave nothing behind" strategies have been becoming a popular treatment for femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans. Atherectomy before drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty may have an advantage in improving the efficiency of drug delivery into the blood vessel wall. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of directional atherectomy combined with DCB angioplasty with DCB angioplasty alone in the treatment of femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients with femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans who received endovascular therapy from June 2016 to June 2018 in our hospital and presented with life-limiting claudication or severe chronic limb ischemia comprised the study cohort. The patients were randomized to receive directional atherectomy combined with DCB angioplasty (n = 45) or DCB alone (n = 49). Ninety-four patients were enrolled in our study with 72 males, and the mean age was 67 ± 10 years. The mean lesion length was 112 ± 64 mm.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of patients and lesions between the 2 randomized groups (P > 0.05). Flow-limiting dissections occurred more frequently in the DCB group (n = 12; 24.5%) than in the DA-DCB group (n = 2; 4.4%; P = 0.006). The technical success rate in the DA-DCB group was superior to that in the DCB group (95.6% vs. 75.5%, P = 0.006). The mean follow-up duration was 16.7 ± 6.1 months in the DCB group and 15.3 ± 5.8 months in the DA-DCB group. No amputations were performed. The overall mortality in the DCB group was 4.1% (2/49), while all patients survived in the DA-DCB group. The 12-month and 24-month primary patencies in the DA-DCB group were greater than those in the DCB group (80.5% vs. 75.7% and 67.1% vs. 55.1%, respectively); however, using all available patency data, no significant differences over time were observed (P = 0.377).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, directional atherectomy combined with DCB angioplasty can decrease the flow-limiting dissection rate in the treatment of femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans compared with DCB angioplasty alone. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of primary patency rate which was needed to be further clarified.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31449956
pii: S0890-5096(19)30589-8
doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.06.014
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cardiovascular Agents
0
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
181-187Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.