Exploring the approaches of non-Indigenous researchers to Indigenous research: a qualitative study.
Journal
CMAJ open
ISSN: 2291-0026
Titre abrégé: CMAJ Open
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101620603
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
28
8
2019
pubmed:
28
8
2019
medline:
28
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Given the history of unethical research in Indigenous communities, there is often apprehension among Indigenous communities toward research carried out by non-Indigenous researchers. We examined the approaches, experiences and motivations among non-Indigenous researchers at a research-intensive Canadian university conducting research with Indigenous communities to understand approaches to ethical research with Indigenous peoples. We performed a critical constructivist qualitative study incorporating decolonizing methodologies. We conducted semistructured interviews with 8 non-Indigenous University of Toronto researchers with a research focus/interest related to Indigenous health between August and October 2017. The interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed through an iterative process. Shared experiences among the researchers were arranged into primary themes. We identified 4 primary themes related to the conduct of Indigenous research by non-Indigenous researchers: 1) relationships with communities are foundational to the research process, 2) non-Indigenous researchers experience a personal self-reflective journey grounded in reconciliation, allyship and privilege, 3) accepted knowledge frameworks in Indigenous research are familiar to most but are inconsistently applied and 4) institutions act as barriers to and facilitators of ethical conduct of Indigenous research. Four core principles - relationships, trust, humility and accountability - unified the primary themes. We identified strengths and areas for improvement of current policies and practices in Indigenous research by non-Indigenous researchers. Although non-Indigenous researchers value relationships, and their research is informed by Indigenous knowledge, institutional barriers to implementing recommended elements exist, and certain policy statements such as the Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 lack applicability to secondary data analysis for some non-Indigenous researchers.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Given the history of unethical research in Indigenous communities, there is often apprehension among Indigenous communities toward research carried out by non-Indigenous researchers. We examined the approaches, experiences and motivations among non-Indigenous researchers at a research-intensive Canadian university conducting research with Indigenous communities to understand approaches to ethical research with Indigenous peoples.
METHODS
METHODS
We performed a critical constructivist qualitative study incorporating decolonizing methodologies. We conducted semistructured interviews with 8 non-Indigenous University of Toronto researchers with a research focus/interest related to Indigenous health between August and October 2017. The interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed through an iterative process. Shared experiences among the researchers were arranged into primary themes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We identified 4 primary themes related to the conduct of Indigenous research by non-Indigenous researchers: 1) relationships with communities are foundational to the research process, 2) non-Indigenous researchers experience a personal self-reflective journey grounded in reconciliation, allyship and privilege, 3) accepted knowledge frameworks in Indigenous research are familiar to most but are inconsistently applied and 4) institutions act as barriers to and facilitators of ethical conduct of Indigenous research. Four core principles - relationships, trust, humility and accountability - unified the primary themes.
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSIONS
We identified strengths and areas for improvement of current policies and practices in Indigenous research by non-Indigenous researchers. Although non-Indigenous researchers value relationships, and their research is informed by Indigenous knowledge, institutional barriers to implementing recommended elements exist, and certain policy statements such as the Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 lack applicability to secondary data analysis for some non-Indigenous researchers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31451446
pii: 7/3/E504
doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180204
pmc: PMC6715113
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
E504-E509Informations de copyright
Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6
pubmed: 10625273
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2008 Jun;3(2):33-51
pubmed: 19385744
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Dec;5(4):23-32
pubmed: 21133784
Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Nov 21;10:36
pubmed: 23171160
Gerontologist. 2014 Feb;54(1):117-26
pubmed: 23841952
Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Feb;19(2):64
pubmed: 24596474
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970
Med Educ. 2017 Jan;51(1):40-50
pubmed: 27981658