Radiotherapy after skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction in intermediate-risk breast cancer : Indication and technical considerations.

Strahlentherapie nach hautschonender Mastektomie mit sofortiger Brustrekonstruktion bei Brustkrebs mit intermediärem Risiko : Indikation und technische Überlegungen.

Journal

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]
ISSN: 1439-099X
Titre abrégé: Strahlenther Onkol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8603469

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Historique:
received: 17 07 2019
accepted: 26 07 2019
pubmed: 28 8 2019
medline: 20 3 2020
entrez: 28 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Skin-sparing (SSME) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSME) were developed to improve the cosmetic results for breast cancer (BC) patients, both allowing for immediate breast reconstruction. Recommendations for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) are primarily derived from trials where patients were treated by standard mastectomies. Due to their more conservative character, SSME and especially NSME potentially leave more glandular tissue at risk for subclinical disease. Rates and sites of locoregional failures following SSME and NSME plus/minus reconstruction were analyzed regarding tumor stage and biological risk factors. In particular, the role of PMRT in "intermediate"-risk and early stage high-risk breast cancer patients was revisited. Implications on targeting and dose delivery of PMRT were critically reviewed. The value of PMRT in stage III BC remains undisputed. For node-negative BC patients, the majority of reports classify clinical and biological features such as tumor size, close surgical margins, premenopausal status, multicentricity, lymphangiosis, triple-negativity, HER2-overexpression, and poor tumor grading as associated with higher rates of locoregional relapse, thus, building an "intermediate" risk group. Surveys revealed that the majority of radiation oncologists use risk-adaptive models also considering the number of coinciding factors for the estimation of recurrence probability following SSME and NSME. Constellations with a 10-year locoregional recurrence risk of >10% are usually triggering the indication for PMRT. There was no common belief that the amount of residual tissue, e.g., tissue thickness over flaps, serves as additional decision aid. Modern treatment planning can ensure optimal dose distribution for PMRT in almost all patients with SSME. There are no reliable data supporting a reduction of the treatment volume from the CTV chest wall, e.g., to the nipple-areola complex, to the dorsal aspect behind the implant volume, the pectoralis muscle, nor the regional interpectoral, axillary, or complete regional lymph nodes only. The omission of a skin bolus in intermediate-risk BC does not compromise oncological safety. For intermediate-risk as well as early stage high-risk BC patients, the DEGRO Breast Cancer Expert Panel recommends the use of PMRT following SSME and NSME when a 10-year locoregional recurrence risk is likely to be greater than 10%, as estimated by clinical and biological risk factors. Subvolume-only radiation is discouraged outside of trials. The impact of adequate systemic treatment and the value of radiotherapy on optimal locoregional tumor control, with the goal of less than 5% LRR at 10-years follow-up, has to be verified in prospective trials.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Skin-sparing (SSME) and nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSME) were developed to improve the cosmetic results for breast cancer (BC) patients, both allowing for immediate breast reconstruction. Recommendations for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) are primarily derived from trials where patients were treated by standard mastectomies. Due to their more conservative character, SSME and especially NSME potentially leave more glandular tissue at risk for subclinical disease.
METHODS METHODS
Rates and sites of locoregional failures following SSME and NSME plus/minus reconstruction were analyzed regarding tumor stage and biological risk factors. In particular, the role of PMRT in "intermediate"-risk and early stage high-risk breast cancer patients was revisited. Implications on targeting and dose delivery of PMRT were critically reviewed.
RESULTS RESULTS
The value of PMRT in stage III BC remains undisputed. For node-negative BC patients, the majority of reports classify clinical and biological features such as tumor size, close surgical margins, premenopausal status, multicentricity, lymphangiosis, triple-negativity, HER2-overexpression, and poor tumor grading as associated with higher rates of locoregional relapse, thus, building an "intermediate" risk group. Surveys revealed that the majority of radiation oncologists use risk-adaptive models also considering the number of coinciding factors for the estimation of recurrence probability following SSME and NSME. Constellations with a 10-year locoregional recurrence risk of >10% are usually triggering the indication for PMRT. There was no common belief that the amount of residual tissue, e.g., tissue thickness over flaps, serves as additional decision aid. Modern treatment planning can ensure optimal dose distribution for PMRT in almost all patients with SSME. There are no reliable data supporting a reduction of the treatment volume from the CTV chest wall, e.g., to the nipple-areola complex, to the dorsal aspect behind the implant volume, the pectoralis muscle, nor the regional interpectoral, axillary, or complete regional lymph nodes only. The omission of a skin bolus in intermediate-risk BC does not compromise oncological safety.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
For intermediate-risk as well as early stage high-risk BC patients, the DEGRO Breast Cancer Expert Panel recommends the use of PMRT following SSME and NSME when a 10-year locoregional recurrence risk is likely to be greater than 10%, as estimated by clinical and biological risk factors. Subvolume-only radiation is discouraged outside of trials. The impact of adequate systemic treatment and the value of radiotherapy on optimal locoregional tumor control, with the goal of less than 5% LRR at 10-years follow-up, has to be verified in prospective trials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31451835
doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01507-9
pii: 10.1007/s00066-019-01507-9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

949-963

Références

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Feb 1;110(2):
pubmed: 28954300
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Aug;100(2):200-4
pubmed: 21852010
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Oct 1;93(2):266-7
pubmed: 26383675
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Jul;194(7):607-618
pubmed: 29383405
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017 Aug;61(4):508-516
pubmed: 27987274
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 May;93(6):1191-204; discussion 1205-7
pubmed: 8171139
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 Mar 08;13(2):3667
pubmed: 22402383
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Nov - Dec;6(6):e219-e234
pubmed: 27659727
Thorac Surg Sci. 2005 Aug 22;2:Doc01
pubmed: 21289920
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Nov 16;8:270
pubmed: 24238366
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 15;62(4):1035-9
pubmed: 15990006
Ann Surg. 1983 Mar;197(3):284-7
pubmed: 6830336
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Oct;44(4):637-42
pubmed: 23460724
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Jan;114(1):3-10
pubmed: 25630428
Strahlenther Onkol. 2010 Nov;186(11):630-6
pubmed: 21072625
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan 09;9:14
pubmed: 24406085
Strahlenther Onkol. 2014 Aug;190(8):705-14
pubmed: 24888511
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Sep;194(9):797-805
pubmed: 29974132
Strahlenther Onkol. 2009 Oct;185(10):669-74
pubmed: 19806332
Minerva Chir. 2012 Jun;67(3):257-70
pubmed: 22691830
Acta Oncol. 2018 Jan;57(1):38-43
pubmed: 29172851
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 1;81(3):e151-7
pubmed: 21420245
Breast J. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(4):440-9
pubmed: 19496781
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):173-80
pubmed: 19884555
Gland Surg. 2018 Jun;7(3):247-257
pubmed: 29998074
Ann Surg Oncol. 2003 Mar;10(2):102-7
pubmed: 12620902
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 1;81(3):e165-71
pubmed: 21362579
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Nov;17(11):2899-908
pubmed: 20443145
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Feb;131:229-236
pubmed: 30055939
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Apr;91(1):23-32
pubmed: 18996609
Breast J. 2017 Jan;23(1):26-33
pubmed: 27612282
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 20;29(21):2852-8
pubmed: 21670451
Cancer. 2017 Jul 15;123(14):2626-2633
pubmed: 28334423
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1516-1529
pubmed: 30337220
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(26):e7343
pubmed: 28658151
Eur Radiol. 2014 Sep;24(9):2220-6
pubmed: 24852813
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Mar;110(3):461-6
pubmed: 24424386
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Dec;16(12):3414-21
pubmed: 19672659
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Sep 1;66(1):305-10
pubmed: 16904530
Med Dosim. 2012 Summer;37(2):163-9
pubmed: 21865026
Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Dec;12(12):1037-44
pubmed: 16244800
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Jan;93(1):96-106; discussion 107-8
pubmed: 8278489
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1966 Mar;122(3):529-40
pubmed: 5908662
Gland Surg. 2016 Feb;5(1):55-62
pubmed: 26855909
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;25(13):3849-3857
pubmed: 30225833
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part13):3757
pubmed: 28517303
J Radiat Res. 2017 Jan;58(1):66-70
pubmed: 27422934
Ann Oncol. 2012 Aug;23(8):2053-8
pubmed: 22231025
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4117-23
pubmed: 22820937
Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2127-35
pubmed: 24656685
World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug 14;11(1):194
pubmed: 23945398
Br J Radiol. 2016 Aug;89(1064):20160060
pubmed: 27251295
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Feb;111(2):712-20; discussion 721-2
pubmed: 12560692
Gland Surg. 2016 Feb;5(1):63-8
pubmed: 26855910
Med Phys. 2005 Jun;32(6):1640-6
pubmed: 16013723
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Mar 24;28:41
pubmed: 19317895
Cureus. 2016 Dec 9;8(12):e924
pubmed: 28090417
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jan;126(1):139-147
pubmed: 29050960
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Aug;193(8):601-603
pubmed: 28631018

Auteurs

Thomas Hehr (T)

Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. thomas.hehr@vinzenz.de.

René Baumann (R)

St. Marien-Krankenhaus Siegen, Siegen, Germany.

Wilfried Budach (W)

Heinrich-Heine-University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Marciana-Nona Duma (MN)

Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.

Jürgen Dunst (J)

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

Petra Feyer (P)

Vivantes Hospital Neukoelln, Berlin, Germany.

Rainer Fietkau (R)

University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Wulf Haase (W)

St.-Vincentius-Hospital Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Wolfgang Harms (W)

St. Claraspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

David Krug (D)

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

Marc D Piroth (MD)

Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Wuppertal, Germany.

Felix Sedlmayer (F)

Paracelsus Medical University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Rainer Souchon (R)

University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.

Frederick Wenz (F)

Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Rolf Sauer (R)

University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH