The Systemic Treatment of Melanoma.


Journal

Deutsches Arzteblatt international
ISSN: 1866-0452
Titre abrégé: Dtsch Arztebl Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101475967

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 07 2019
Historique:
received: 11 09 2018
revised: 11 09 2018
accepted: 13 05 2019
entrez: 28 8 2019
pubmed: 28 8 2019
medline: 7 7 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The systemic treatment of metastatic melanoma has improved considerably with the introduction of new, targeted substances and immune checkpoint inhibitors. This article presents treatment options for advanced inoperable melanoma and in the setting of adjuvant treatment after complete metastasectomy. The data for analysis were derived from a selective literature search in PubMed and a search for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which target the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen or the "programmed death" (PD) receptor, activate T-cells and other immune cells, so that the body's own immune system attacks the melanoma. In unselected patients, immune checkpoint inhibition using nivolumab improved overall survival compared with dacarbazine (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.42; P<0.001). The antibody pem- brolizumab also led to better overall survival than ipilimumab (HR 0.68; P<0.001). Combination treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies improved overall survival even more than ipilimumab monotherapy, albeit at the cost of greater toxic- ity (HR 0.55; P<0.001). Another treatment approach aims to inhibit intracellular signal transduction in the melanoma cells. For patients with a BRAF-V66 mutation, combination treatments with BRAF/MEK inhibitors led to a rapid response in most cases (64-75%). In principle, the novel treatments are also effective in patients with cerebral metastases. In the adjuvant setting, both immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors reduced the risk of recurrence by about 50%. High-quality studies show that the new substances are clinically effective in the palliative and adjuvant treatment of melanoma.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The systemic treatment of metastatic melanoma has improved considerably with the introduction of new, targeted substances and immune checkpoint inhibitors. This article presents treatment options for advanced inoperable melanoma and in the setting of adjuvant treatment after complete metastasectomy.
METHODS
The data for analysis were derived from a selective literature search in PubMed and a search for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library.
RESULTS
Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which target the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen or the "programmed death" (PD) receptor, activate T-cells and other immune cells, so that the body's own immune system attacks the melanoma. In unselected patients, immune checkpoint inhibition using nivolumab improved overall survival compared with dacarbazine (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.42; P<0.001). The antibody pem- brolizumab also led to better overall survival than ipilimumab (HR 0.68; P<0.001). Combination treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies improved overall survival even more than ipilimumab monotherapy, albeit at the cost of greater toxic- ity (HR 0.55; P<0.001). Another treatment approach aims to inhibit intracellular signal transduction in the melanoma cells. For patients with a BRAF-V66 mutation, combination treatments with BRAF/MEK inhibitors led to a rapid response in most cases (64-75%). In principle, the novel treatments are also effective in patients with cerebral metastases. In the adjuvant setting, both immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors reduced the risk of recurrence by about 50%.
CONCLUSION
High-quality studies show that the new substances are clinically effective in the palliative and adjuvant treatment of melanoma.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31452501
pii: arztebl.2019.0497
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0497
pmc: PMC6726851
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

497-504

Références

N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 4;371(23):2189-2199
pubmed: 25409260
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 1;33(25):2780-8
pubmed: 26014293
N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):711-23
pubmed: 20525992
Cancer Immunol Res. 2013 Jul;1(1):32-42
pubmed: 24777248
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):375-84
pubmed: 25795410
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 10;33(17):1889-94
pubmed: 25667295
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1853-1862
pubmed: 28822576
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Feb 22;116(8):119-126
pubmed: 30940340
Cancer Cell. 2018 Apr 9;33(4):649-663.e4
pubmed: 29576375
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30
pubmed: 25399552
Lancet Oncol. 2015 May;16(5):522-30
pubmed: 25840693
Ann Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;28(3):634-641
pubmed: 27993793
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1824-1835
pubmed: 28891423
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1315-1327
pubmed: 30219628
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):863-873
pubmed: 28592387
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 30;364(26):2507-16
pubmed: 21639808
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Sep;17(9):1248-60
pubmed: 27480103
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 10;375(19):1845-1855
pubmed: 27717298
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 9;377(19):1813-1823
pubmed: 28891408
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):30-9
pubmed: 25399551
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):510-520
pubmed: 29477665
Cell. 2015 Jun 18;161(7):1681-96
pubmed: 26091043
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1789-1801
pubmed: 29658430
Front Immunol. 2018 Jun 28;9:1474
pubmed: 30002656
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Apr;18(4):435-445
pubmed: 28284557
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1743-1754
pubmed: 27864013
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1345-1356
pubmed: 28889792
Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):603-615
pubmed: 29573941
Nature. 2016 Aug 4;536(7614):91-5
pubmed: 27350335
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Mar;91:116-124
pubmed: 29360604
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(7):1631-1639
pubmed: 28475671
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1382-1388
pubmed: 30073321
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;82:171-183
pubmed: 28692949
Science. 2018 Mar 23;359(6382):1350-1355
pubmed: 29567705
Lancet Oncol. 2018 May;19(5):672-681
pubmed: 29602646
Lancet. 2012 Jul 28;380(9839):358-65
pubmed: 22735384
Nature. 2017 May 11;545(7653):175-180
pubmed: 28467829
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv119-iv142
pubmed: 28881921
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 23;379(8):722-730
pubmed: 30134131

Auteurs

Patrick Terheyden (P)

Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venerology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck; Department of Internal Medicine III, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital rechts der Isar, TU München; Department of Dermatology University of Tübingen.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH