Trends and Predictors of 30-day Readmission Among Patients Hospitalized with Infective Endocarditis in the United States.

30 day readmission elixhauser comorbidity index infective endocarditis predictors of readmission united states

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Jun 2019
Historique:
entrez: 28 8 2019
pubmed: 28 8 2019
medline: 28 8 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Background The incidence and 30-day readmission rates of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) are not fully determined. We used the United States Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) to assess national trends and predictors of 30-day readmission. Methods We queried the NRD from 2010 to 2014 and identified patients with index hospitalizations primarily for IE. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of 30-day readmission. Results A total of 48,500 patients (mean age 58 ± 19 years; 38% women; 6.4% died during index hospitalization) were admitted for IE. There was an annual decrease in hospitalization rates by 1.5%. With an exception for 2014, subsequent 30-day readmission rates remained relatively unchanged. All-cause 30-day readmission occurred in 25.4% of patients, 21.8% of which were due to acute or subacute bacterial endocarditis. Leaving against medical advice (odds ratio (OR): 3.46, 95% CI: 3.12 - 3.84; P <0.001), history of drug abuse and a cardiac implantable electronic device in situ (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.53 - 3.08; P <0.001), fungal IE (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.28 - 1.76; P < 0.001), and uninsured patients (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.12 - 1.74, P <0.001) were the strongest independent predictors of 30-day readmission. Readmission cost ($58 million annually) accounted for 14% of the total hospitalization cost. Conclusions The annual incidence of IE in the US decreased slightly from 2010 to 2014, but the 30-day readmission rates remained relatively unchanged. Addressing modifiable predictors of readmission may reduce the financial burden of IE on health care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31453034
doi: 10.7759/cureus.4962
pmc: PMC6701895
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e4962

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Dr. Saba has received research support from Boston Scientific and Medtronic. All other authors report no financial or intellectual conflicts of interest related to this manuscript.

Références

J Health Care Finance. 2003 Summer;29(4):29-42
pubmed: 12908652
Circulation. 2005 Jun 14;111(23):e394-434
pubmed: 15956145
Circulation. 2008 Aug 19;118(8):887-96
pubmed: 18663090
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 19;65(19):2070-6
pubmed: 25975469
Circulation. 2015 Oct 13;132(15):1435-86
pubmed: 26373316
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Apr 18;5(4):e003016
pubmed: 27091179
Int J Cardiol. 2017 May 15;235:133-140
pubmed: 28262341
JAMA. 2017 Apr 25;317(16):1652-1660
pubmed: 28444279
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55(7):698-705
pubmed: 28498196
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Mar;29(3):456-462
pubmed: 29193418
JAMA. 2018 Jul 3;320(1):72-83
pubmed: 29971402
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):415-424
pubmed: 30152252
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Apr;94(4):588-598
pubmed: 30853259
Med Care. 1998 Jan;36(1):8-27
pubmed: 9431328

Auteurs

Deepak Kumar Pasupula (DK)

Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA.

Anusha Ganapati Bhat (AG)

Internal Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA.

Sudeep K Siddappa Malleshappa (SK)

Internal Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA.

Amir Lotfi (A)

Cardiology, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA.

Mara Slawsky (M)

Cardiology, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA.

Sam Buffer (S)

Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA.

Quinn Pack (Q)

Cardiology, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA.

Samir Saba (S)

Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA.

Classifications MeSH