Management strategies for recurrent acute rhinosinusitis.

Rhinosinusitis balloon dilation chronic rhinosinusitis endoscopic sinus surgery medical therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis sinus surgery

Journal

Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology
ISSN: 2378-8038
Titre abrégé: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101684963

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Historique:
received: 03 09 2018
revised: 05 05 2019
accepted: 20 06 2019
entrez: 28 8 2019
pubmed: 28 8 2019
medline: 28 8 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Management of patients with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS) is often challenging, and robust data in the literature is scant. The aim of this study is to better characterize the current treatment strategies for RARS used by otolaryngologists. An online survey sent to all members of the American Rhinologic Society in a 1 month period evaluated demographics, practice characteristics, and management strategies for patients with RARS, subdivided into those with (RARSwD) and without (RARSsD) septal deviation. Eighty-eight practicing members responded, of whom 41% were fellowship-trained rhinologists. For most cases of RARSsD, 61% of otolaryngologists would primarily use medical management. Most would wait until patients had experienced 4-5 episodes to perform balloon sinuplasty (80%) or formal sinus surgery (79%). The sinus surgery procedure of choice was limited sinus surgery (62%). For RARSwD, 52% primarily chose medical management. Most would wait until patients had experienced 4-5 episodes to perform balloon sinuplasty (80%) or formal sinus surgery (78%). Nearly all fellowship-trained rhinologists (97%) would perform limited sinus surgery with septoplasty for RARSwD, compared to only 70% of other otolaryngologists who would do so and 24% who would perform complete sinus surgery with septoplasty. While 89% of practitioners in private practice would wait to perform balloon sinuplasty until patients had experienced 4-5 episodes, only 68% of those in academia would wait this long and 23% would do so after only 1-3 episodes. Treatment of patients with RARS is complex, and the differences in strategies employed between groups of otolaryngologists may reflect their training backgrounds and different patient populations. V.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Management of patients with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS) is often challenging, and robust data in the literature is scant. The aim of this study is to better characterize the current treatment strategies for RARS used by otolaryngologists.
METHODS METHODS
An online survey sent to all members of the American Rhinologic Society in a 1 month period evaluated demographics, practice characteristics, and management strategies for patients with RARS, subdivided into those with (RARSwD) and without (RARSsD) septal deviation. Eighty-eight practicing members responded, of whom 41% were fellowship-trained rhinologists.
RESULTS RESULTS
For most cases of RARSsD, 61% of otolaryngologists would primarily use medical management. Most would wait until patients had experienced 4-5 episodes to perform balloon sinuplasty (80%) or formal sinus surgery (79%). The sinus surgery procedure of choice was limited sinus surgery (62%). For RARSwD, 52% primarily chose medical management. Most would wait until patients had experienced 4-5 episodes to perform balloon sinuplasty (80%) or formal sinus surgery (78%). Nearly all fellowship-trained rhinologists (97%) would perform limited sinus surgery with septoplasty for RARSwD, compared to only 70% of other otolaryngologists who would do so and 24% who would perform complete sinus surgery with septoplasty. While 89% of practitioners in private practice would wait to perform balloon sinuplasty until patients had experienced 4-5 episodes, only 68% of those in academia would wait this long and 23% would do so after only 1-3 episodes.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Treatment of patients with RARS is complex, and the differences in strategies employed between groups of otolaryngologists may reflect their training backgrounds and different patient populations.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE METHODS
V.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31453344
doi: 10.1002/lio2.294
pii: LIO2294
pmc: PMC6703111
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

379-382

Références

Laryngoscope. 2006 Oct;116(10):1805-8
pubmed: 17003725
Am J Rhinol. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):329-33
pubmed: 18588769
Laryngoscope. 2013 Jan;123(1):11-6
pubmed: 22952090
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Nov;149(5):668-73
pubmed: 24013138
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Nov;149(5):664-7
pubmed: 24065207
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013 Nov;122(11):665-71
pubmed: 24358625
Vital Health Stat 10. 2014 Feb;(260):1-161
pubmed: 24819891
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Apr;152(2 Suppl):S1-S39
pubmed: 25832968
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015 Aug;5(8):667-73
pubmed: 25950995
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Nov;6(11):1182-1187
pubmed: 27309906
Laryngoscope. 2017 Jun;127(6):1255-1256
pubmed: 27905114
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Sep;117(3 Pt 2):S1-7
pubmed: 9334782

Auteurs

Jiahui Lin (J)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York U.S.A.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Columbia University Medical Center New York New York U.S.A.

Ashutosh Kacker (A)

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York U.S.A.

Classifications MeSH