Safety Profile of the New Harmonic Focus: Different Emissivity and Temperature Behavior Between the Active and the Inactive Blade.
Journal
Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques
ISSN: 1534-4908
Titre abrégé: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100888751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
28
8
2019
medline:
3
3
2020
entrez:
28
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ultrasonic devices disperse less energy in the tissues. The new Harmonic Focus+ (HF+) seems to be more efficient but thermal damages have been reported. This study examined the temperature and the emissivity profile of the active and passive blades of the HF+, on a pig tissue model at different power settings. The FLIR System B series thermal imaging camera has been used on various biological pig tissues to evaluate the emissivity of the ultrasonic device. The active blade heats up faster than the passive one and the increase in power increases the speed of the temperature raising only on the active blade. Increasing the power setting reduces the dissection time and the temperature of both blades. Active blade temperatures of <60°C are obtained with cutting times close to 5 seconds; with these cutting times, the inactive blade does not exceed 30°C. The HF+ emissivity profiles demonstrate that the behavior of the inactive blade is significantly different from the active one. To prevent thermal damages, keep the active blade toward the operator, do not exceed 5 seconds of activation, use the maximum power, and avoid the use of the instrument as a dissector immediately after its activation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31453911
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000712
pmc: PMC6818976
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Technical Report
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e79-e83Références
Surg Endosc. 2015 May;29(5):1179-84
pubmed: 25159635
Laryngoscope. 2015 Aug;125(8):E283-90
pubmed: 26010439
ANZ J Surg. 2010 Nov;80(11):822-6
pubmed: 20969691
JSLS. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):115-9
pubmed: 20412639
J Surg Res. 2017 May 15;212:101-107
pubmed: 28550895
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;57(2):327-328
pubmed: 29673684
Br J Surg. 2010 Mar;97(3):428-33
pubmed: 20101674
Am J Surg. 2018 Jan;215(1):186-190
pubmed: 28622836
Am J Surg. 2000 Jan;179(1):67-73
pubmed: 10737583
J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1988 Nov;14(11):1213-7
pubmed: 3141490
Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29(4):569-73
pubmed: 25812024
JSLS. 2007 Apr-Jun;11(2):268-71
pubmed: 17761096
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015 Oct;65(5):293-300
pubmed: 26405398
Ann Surg. 2003 Feb;237(2):186-91
pubmed: 12560776
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2735-9
pubmed: 22538677
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2015 Nov-Dec;110(6):545-9
pubmed: 26713829
J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Aug;179(2):161-70
pubmed: 8044385
Int J Urol. 2010 Apr;17(4):377-81
pubmed: 20409232
Endoscopy. 2002 Jul;34(7):575-9
pubmed: 12170413
Can J Surg. 2012 Oct;55(5):317-21
pubmed: 22854112