Minimum Standardized Uptake Value from Quantitative Bone Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Femoral Head Viability in Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture.
Computed tomography
Femur
Fracture
Quantitation
Single-photon emission computed tomography
Standardized uptake value
Journal
Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
ISSN: 1869-3474
Titre abrégé: Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101530478
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
08
04
2019
revised:
16
05
2019
accepted:
07
06
2019
entrez:
29
8
2019
pubmed:
29
8
2019
medline:
29
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bone single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) has been widely used for evaluation of femoral head viability in patients with femoral neck fracture. The current study aimed to investigate utility of standardized uptake value (SUV) from quantitative bone SPECT/CT for assessment of femoral head viability. From March 2015 to November 2018, quantitative bone SPECT/CT was performed in 9 patients with non-viable femoral head post femoral neck fracture and in 31 controls. Maximum (SUVmax), mean (SUVmean), and minimum standardized uptake values (SUVmin) were measured over femoral head and neck. Mann-Whitney As for femoral head viability, SUVmax and SUVmean were not significantly decreased in non-viable femoral heads compared to those in controls. Only the SUVmin was significantly reduced in non-viable femoral heads (mean ± standard deviation, 0.57 ± 0.38) than in controls (0.95 ± 0.26, The non-viable femoral heads from the femoral neck fracture showed significantly reduced SUVmin. Quantitative bone SPECT/CT holds promise for objective evaluation of femoral head viability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31456862
doi: 10.1007/s13139-019-00600-2
pii: 600
pmc: PMC6694326
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
287-295Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of InterestHyun Gee Ryoo, Won Woo Lee, Ji Young Kim, Eunjung Kong, Woo Hee Choi, and Joon-Kee Yoon declare that there is no conflict of interest. This study was supported in part by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (2018R1D1A1A09081961) and by the Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine Clinical Trial Network (KSNM CTN) working group funded by the Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine (KSNM-CTN-2017-01-01).
Références
Semin Nucl Med. 2001 Jan;31(1):3-16
pubmed: 11200204
J Nucl Med. 2002 Aug;43(8):1006-11
pubmed: 12163624
Br J Radiol. 1991 May;64(761):403-8
pubmed: 2036561
J Nucl Med. 1991 Jun;32(6):1157-61
pubmed: 2045928
Nucl Med Commun. 2010 Nov;31(11):958-61
pubmed: 20717063
J Nucl Med. 2013 Jan;54(1):83-9
pubmed: 23283563
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 May;41 Suppl 1:S17-25
pubmed: 24037503
Nucl Med Commun. 2015 Oct;36(10):1055-62
pubmed: 26308940
Radiology. 2016 Sep;280(3):890-6
pubmed: 27035060
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(27):e4170
pubmed: 27399139
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Mar;51(1):49-57
pubmed: 28250858
Clin Radiol. 2017 Jul;72(7):580-589
pubmed: 28400059
Korean J Radiol. 2017 May-Jun;18(3):543-550
pubmed: 28458607
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Dec;51(4):338-346
pubmed: 29242728
Korean J Radiol. 2018 May-Jun;19(3):470-480
pubmed: 29713225
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Oct;52(5):368-376
pubmed: 30344785
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Dec;52(6):468-472
pubmed: 30538779
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(2):e14022
pubmed: 30633193
Radiology. 1988 Jan;166(1 Pt 1):215-20
pubmed: 3336682
Radiology. 1987 Mar;162(3):717-20
pubmed: 3809485
J Nucl Med. 1985 Sep;26(9):979-87
pubmed: 3875700
Lancet. 1980 Sep 27;2(8196):667-70
pubmed: 6106785
Eur J Nucl Med. 1977 Sep 30;2(3):179-81
pubmed: 71992
J Nucl Med. 1994 Jul;35(7):1155-8
pubmed: 8014674