The prevalence of Dissociative Disorders and dissociative experiences in college populations: a meta-analysis of 98 studies.


Journal

Journal of trauma & dissociation : the official journal of the International Society for the Study of Dissociation (ISSD)
ISSN: 1529-9740
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Dissociation
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100898209

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed: 29 8 2019
medline: 18 11 2020
entrez: 29 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This meta-analysis of 31,905 college students includes 12 studies diagnosing Dissociative Disorders (DD) and 92 studies measuring dissociation with the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES). Prevalence rates were used to separately test the plausibility of the Trauma Model (TM) and the Fantasy Model (FM) of dissociation. Results show 11.4% of students sampled meet criteria for DD, which is consistent with the prevalence of experiencing multiple (types of) trauma during childhood (12%), but is not consistent with the very low prevalence expected from the role of fantasy-proneness proposed in the FM. DES scores varied significantly across the 16 countries and were not higher in North America, but in countries that were comparatively unsafe. The least well-known DD was the most common, which is inconsistent with the FM which holds that the diagnosed person is enacting a familiar social role. There was no evidence that DES scores had decreased over recent decades, which does not support FM assertions that DD were a fad of the 1990s. Three of the five hypotheses tested provided clear support for the TM and a fourth hypothesis provided partial support for the TM. None of the five hypotheses tested supported the FM. The finding that DD were slightly more common in college populations than the general population did not support predictions of either model. The theoretical perspective of the authors moderated DES scores, although this is unlikely due to experimenter bias as studies led by FM theorists had significantly higher DES scores than those led by TM theorists.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31461395
doi: 10.1080/15299732.2019.1647915
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Video-Audio Media

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

16-61

Auteurs

Mary-Anne Kate (MA)

Department of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.

Tanya Hopwood (T)

Department of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.

Graham Jamieson (G)

Department of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH