Reference values for psychoacoustic tests on Polish school children 7-10 years old.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
22
10
2018
accepted:
13
08
2019
entrez:
29
8
2019
pubmed:
29
8
2019
medline:
4
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Good hearing is a fundamental skill that allows children to develop properly, both socially and intellectually. In contrast to defects in inner ear function, however, auditory processing disorders (APDs)-which can affect up to 2-3% of school-children-are not easily identified with basic screening programs and must be diagnosed using special tests. Although such psychoacoustic tests are available, the scores achieved depend highly on the social, cultural, and linguistic characteristics of the population, and norms must be established for each population separately. Reference values are still lacking for the Polish population, especially for children in school-age, so that practitioners must interpret test scores themselves, often intuitively or using potentially biased thresholds from other countries. We investigated a sample of 94 Polish schoolchildren with normal hearing, divided into four age groups: from 7 years-olds to 10 years-olds. All children had no speech or language development disorder, learning problem, or symptom of APD. Participants were volunteers who had previously taken part in a large screening study. The group consisted of 56 girls (60%) and 38 boys (40%) with an average age of 8.6 years (SD = 1.1). The test battery included the Duration Pattern Test (DPT), Frequency Pattern Test (FPT), Time-Compressed Speech Test (CST), and Dichotic Digit Test (DDT). The scores on all tests increased consistently with age. The difference between each age-group for DPT, CST, and left- and right-ear DDT tests was significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, p-values = 0.002, 0.006, 0.005, 0.020, respectively), but the effect of age on the FPT test was not (p-value = 0.143). The analysis showed a clear and significant separation between a merged group of ages 7 and 8 and another of ages 9 and 10. We, therefore, propose, for each test, separate reference values for these two particular age-groups. Using thresholds based on a 10% quantile, we offer the following reference values for ages 7-8 and 9-10 respectively: DPT, 28.5% and 53.8%; FPT, 18.5% and 27.5%; CST, 68.6% and 77.2%; left-ear DDT, 34.3% and 52.5%; right-ear DDT, 56% and 72.5%. The scores on psychoacoustic tests to diagnose APD differ between cultures and linguistic backgrounds. Clinicians should, therefore, use norms that have been designed for the population most similar to their patients. Here, we report the use of a test battery designed for the Polish language that accounts for various aspects of APD when screening school children. Together with a full methodology of those tests, we provide norms that can be used as cut-offs in clinical diagnosis. Practitioners are invited to use them to obtain more accurate, evidence-based decisions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Good hearing is a fundamental skill that allows children to develop properly, both socially and intellectually. In contrast to defects in inner ear function, however, auditory processing disorders (APDs)-which can affect up to 2-3% of school-children-are not easily identified with basic screening programs and must be diagnosed using special tests. Although such psychoacoustic tests are available, the scores achieved depend highly on the social, cultural, and linguistic characteristics of the population, and norms must be established for each population separately. Reference values are still lacking for the Polish population, especially for children in school-age, so that practitioners must interpret test scores themselves, often intuitively or using potentially biased thresholds from other countries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We investigated a sample of 94 Polish schoolchildren with normal hearing, divided into four age groups: from 7 years-olds to 10 years-olds. All children had no speech or language development disorder, learning problem, or symptom of APD. Participants were volunteers who had previously taken part in a large screening study. The group consisted of 56 girls (60%) and 38 boys (40%) with an average age of 8.6 years (SD = 1.1). The test battery included the Duration Pattern Test (DPT), Frequency Pattern Test (FPT), Time-Compressed Speech Test (CST), and Dichotic Digit Test (DDT).
RESULTS
The scores on all tests increased consistently with age. The difference between each age-group for DPT, CST, and left- and right-ear DDT tests was significant (Kruskal-Wallis test, p-values = 0.002, 0.006, 0.005, 0.020, respectively), but the effect of age on the FPT test was not (p-value = 0.143). The analysis showed a clear and significant separation between a merged group of ages 7 and 8 and another of ages 9 and 10. We, therefore, propose, for each test, separate reference values for these two particular age-groups. Using thresholds based on a 10% quantile, we offer the following reference values for ages 7-8 and 9-10 respectively: DPT, 28.5% and 53.8%; FPT, 18.5% and 27.5%; CST, 68.6% and 77.2%; left-ear DDT, 34.3% and 52.5%; right-ear DDT, 56% and 72.5%.
CONCLUSION
The scores on psychoacoustic tests to diagnose APD differ between cultures and linguistic backgrounds. Clinicians should, therefore, use norms that have been designed for the population most similar to their patients. Here, we report the use of a test battery designed for the Polish language that accounts for various aspects of APD when screening school children. Together with a full methodology of those tests, we provide norms that can be used as cut-offs in clinical diagnosis. Practitioners are invited to use them to obtain more accurate, evidence-based decisions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31461473
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221689
pii: PONE-D-18-24935
pmc: PMC6713444
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0221689Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Am Acad Audiol. 2000 Sep;11(8):438-45
pubmed: 11012239
J Am Acad Audiol. 2000 Oct;11(9):467-74
pubmed: 11057730
Am J Audiol. 2000 Dec;9(2):63-8
pubmed: 11200193
Audiology. 2001 Mar-Apr;40(2):69-77
pubmed: 11409765
J Am Acad Audiol. 2002 Jun;13(6):332-8
pubmed: 12141390
Int J Audiol. 2002 Sep;41(6):334-46
pubmed: 12353606
Int J Audiol. 2006 Nov;45(11):645-59
pubmed: 17118907
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2007 Jun;62(3):261-72
pubmed: 17589666
Am J Otol. 1991 Mar;12(2):109-13
pubmed: 2053600
Brain Cogn. 2011 Jul;76(2):316-22
pubmed: 21530051
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Feb;23(2):97-105
pubmed: 22353678
Audiology. 1990;29(6):304-13
pubmed: 2275645
Med Pr. 2015;66(2):145-52
pubmed: 26294307
Int J Audiol. 2017 Jul;56(7):499-506
pubmed: 28635503
Front Neurol. 2017 Nov 21;8:622
pubmed: 29209272
J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Jun;49(6):1778-83
pubmed: 5125723
Ear Hear. 1983 Nov-Dec;4(6):318-23
pubmed: 6653937
Ear Hear. 1983 Mar-Apr;4(2):79-83
pubmed: 6840415
J Am Acad Audiol. 1995 Jul;6(4):286-92
pubmed: 7548928
Cogn Psychol. 1995 Aug;29(1):1-23
pubmed: 7641524
J Am Acad Audiol. 1994 Jul;5(4):265-8
pubmed: 7949300
Br J Audiol. 1994 Feb;28(1):27-39
pubmed: 7987269
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Oct;19(5):667-75
pubmed: 9408797
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Aug;41(4):834-45
pubmed: 9712130