Effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation on recurrent headaches in children aged 7-14 years, Protocol for a randomized clinical trial.


Journal

Chiropractic & manual therapies
ISSN: 2045-709X
Titre abrégé: Chiropr Man Therap
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101551481

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 11 02 2019
accepted: 06 06 2019
entrez: 30 8 2019
pubmed: 30 8 2019
medline: 13 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Headache is one of the most common pain symptoms in childhood having a negative impact on many aspects of the lives of affected children, both short-term and long-term. Therefore, it is important to document safe and effective treatment options. Chiropractic spinal manipulation is a commonly used treatment option for these patients, although there are no randomized clinical trials documenting the effectiveness of this in pediatric headache. However, there is moderate evidence for effectiveness of spinal manipulation for adults with tension-type and cervicogenic headaches.This paper describes the protocol for a two-armed randomized superiority clinical trial aiming to investigate the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation in the treatment of recurrent headache in children aged 7-14. Children with weekly headaches for at least six months will be included if they have indications for chiropractic manipulation. The participants will be randomized to either chiropractic manipulation or sham manipulation. Both children and parents will be blinded for allocation. There will be 100 children in each arm and they will answer weekly text messages four weeks prior to treatment and during a four months treatment period. Potential primary outcomes are weekly number of headaches, intensity of headache, medication use and global perceived effect. Secondary outcomes include side-effects and headache status after one year.An initial outcome data analysis will be performed to inform the choice of primary outcome (adaptive design). Intervention effects will be reported as the difference in mean values between the two treatment arms, Cohen's effect size and numbers needed to treat. A major strength of this study is its pragmatic nature, where the active treatment group receives chiropractic manipulation according to their individual needs, while both groups continue their use of medication for headache according to their pre-trial habits. Other strengths include an elaborate sham procedure and the weekly outcome reports, reducing recall bias.If it is possible to develop effective treatment for headache in children, a life course of recurring problems may be altered with potential positive implications for both individuals and society. ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02684916.

Sections du résumé

Background
Headache is one of the most common pain symptoms in childhood having a negative impact on many aspects of the lives of affected children, both short-term and long-term. Therefore, it is important to document safe and effective treatment options. Chiropractic spinal manipulation is a commonly used treatment option for these patients, although there are no randomized clinical trials documenting the effectiveness of this in pediatric headache. However, there is moderate evidence for effectiveness of spinal manipulation for adults with tension-type and cervicogenic headaches.This paper describes the protocol for a two-armed randomized superiority clinical trial aiming to investigate the effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation versus sham manipulation in the treatment of recurrent headache in children aged 7-14.
Methods
Children with weekly headaches for at least six months will be included if they have indications for chiropractic manipulation. The participants will be randomized to either chiropractic manipulation or sham manipulation. Both children and parents will be blinded for allocation. There will be 100 children in each arm and they will answer weekly text messages four weeks prior to treatment and during a four months treatment period. Potential primary outcomes are weekly number of headaches, intensity of headache, medication use and global perceived effect. Secondary outcomes include side-effects and headache status after one year.An initial outcome data analysis will be performed to inform the choice of primary outcome (adaptive design). Intervention effects will be reported as the difference in mean values between the two treatment arms, Cohen's effect size and numbers needed to treat.
Discussion
A major strength of this study is its pragmatic nature, where the active treatment group receives chiropractic manipulation according to their individual needs, while both groups continue their use of medication for headache according to their pre-trial habits. Other strengths include an elaborate sham procedure and the weekly outcome reports, reducing recall bias.If it is possible to develop effective treatment for headache in children, a life course of recurring problems may be altered with potential positive implications for both individuals and society.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02684916.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31462990
doi: 10.1186/s12998-019-0262-y
pii: 262
pmc: PMC6706934
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02684916']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

40

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsSLR and HWC work in private chiropractic practice. JH, HWC, WV and LH are partly employed by The Nordic Institute for Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, which is funded jointly by the Danish Chiropractors and the Danish Regions.

Références

Chiropr Man Therap. 2016 Aug 01;24:24
pubmed: 27482376
Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 Nov 07;22(1):37
pubmed: 25389462
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2011 May;15(3):234-40
pubmed: 21177128
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jul-Aug;29(6):475-85, 485.e1-10
pubmed: 16904495
Man Ther. 2010 Aug;15(4):355-63
pubmed: 20097115
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 Jun;34(5):274-89
pubmed: 21640251
Headache. 2012 Feb;52(2):333-9
pubmed: 22288433
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2012 Jun;56(2):87-91
pubmed: 22675219
Chiropr Osteopat. 2010 May 26;18:10
pubmed: 20500900
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Oct;32(8):607-15
pubmed: 19836596
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;72(1):86-92
pubmed: 11784831
Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 Mar 28;22(1):12
pubmed: 24679336
Headache. 2008 Jan;48(1):16-25
pubmed: 18184281
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2006 Oct;10(5):387-90
pubmed: 16945257
Cephalalgia. 2006 Jul;26(7):820-30
pubmed: 16776697
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992 Jun;15(5):309-17
pubmed: 1302464
Cephalalgia. 2002 Jun;22(5):401-8
pubmed: 12110116
Cephalalgia. 1997 Jun;17(4):492-8
pubmed: 9209768
Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1029-41
pubmed: 7786985
Cephalalgia. 2003 Mar;23(2):138-45
pubmed: 12603371
Cephalalgia. 2002 Apr;22(3):179-85
pubmed: 12047454
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
J Child Neurol. 2009 May;24(5):536-43
pubmed: 19406755
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012 Feb;16(1):60-72
pubmed: 22102156
J Headache Pain. 2005 Jun;6(3):135-42
pubmed: 16355294
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Oct;32(8):625-34
pubmed: 19836598
Chiropr Osteopat. 2010 Jun 02;18:12
pubmed: 20525194
Paediatr Child Health. 2009 Jan;14(1):24-30
pubmed: 19436460
Complement Ther Med. 2012 Aug;20(4):232-9
pubmed: 22579436
BMC Med. 2018 Feb 28;16(1):29
pubmed: 29490655
J Headache Pain. 2007 Oct;8(5):263-72
pubmed: 17955166
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 06;5:11774
pubmed: 26145718
Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808
pubmed: 23771276
Pediatrics. 2007 Jan;119(1):e275-83
pubmed: 17178922
J Child Neurol. 2007 Oct;22(10):1172-81
pubmed: 17940243

Auteurs

Susanne Lynge (S)

Private chiropractic practice, Vivaldisvej 6, 9700 Broenderslev, Denmark.

Jan Hartvigsen (J)

2Nordic Institute for Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
3Department Of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.

Henrik Wulff Christensen (HW)

2Nordic Institute for Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
Private chiropractic practice, Enghavevej 2, 5800 Nyborg, Denmark.

Werner Vach (W)

2Nordic Institute for Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
5Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.

Lise Hestbaek (L)

2Nordic Institute for Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
3Department Of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH