Prevalence, morphology, and morphometry of the pterygospinous bar: a meta-analysis.
Civinini’s foramen
Ossified ligament
Pterygospinous bar
Pterygospinous foramen
Journal
Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA
ISSN: 1279-8517
Titre abrégé: Surg Radiol Anat
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8608029
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
06
09
2018
accepted:
13
08
2019
pubmed:
30
8
2019
medline:
22
12
2020
entrez:
30
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of the study was to analyze the total prevalence, morphologic, and morphometric characteristics of the pterygospinous (PS) bar and its gender and ethnic differences among populations. PS bar is an ossified anatomic structure stretching between the posterior margin of the lateral pterygoid lamina to the angular spine of the undersurface of the sphenoid, with potential clinical implications. There is no consensus in the literature on its prevalence, morphologic, and morphometric characteristics. A thorough search of databases was conducted. Data on the prevalence, morphology, i.e., ossification type (complete and incomplete), side, gender, laterality, and morphometrics, of the PS bar were extracted and pooled into a meta-analysis. A total of 35 studies (n = 14,047 subjects) were analyzed. The overall pooled prevalence of a complete PS bar was 4.4% (95% CI 3.7-5.1), while the overall pooled prevalence of an incomplete PS bar was significantly higher (11.6% [95% CI 8.5-15.2]). A complete PS bar was more prevalent among males and was more commonly unilaterally, on the left side. The overall prevalence of PS bar is quite common. It could be of importance for clinicians who should consider its potential presence when planning surgical approaches to the retropharyngeal and parapharyngeal space.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31463681
doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02305-9
pii: 10.1007/s00276-019-02305-9
pmc: PMC7096365
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
497-507Références
Anat Res Int. 2014;2014:286794
pubmed: 24963408
Neurosurgery. 2009 Dec;65(6 Suppl):60-4; discussion 64
pubmed: 19935003
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1968 Nov;26(5):654-7
pubmed: 5245687
Kaibogaku Zasshi. 2000 Apr;75(2):241-9
pubmed: 10824516
Surg Radiol Anat. 2011 May;33(4):291-9
pubmed: 20697711
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1947 Mar;5(1):79-86
pubmed: 20290963
Anat Cell Biol. 2016 Jun;49(2):143-50
pubmed: 27382517
Clin Anat. 2001 Jul;14(4):282-4
pubmed: 11424204
Med Arh. 2000;54(3):133-7
pubmed: 11117007
Eur J Morphol. 2002 Jul;40(3):171-80
pubmed: 14566610
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;42(5):e266-70
pubmed: 24290255
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2008;109(11):525-7
pubmed: 19205566
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;256(4):205-8
pubmed: 10337513
Surg Radiol Anat. 2016 Oct;38(8):931-6
pubmed: 26872952
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther. 1951 Feb;65(2):180-2
pubmed: 14885582
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1968 Aug;26(2):244-60
pubmed: 4969119
Med Radiogr Photogr. 1959;35:2-6
pubmed: 14434905
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1946 Jun;4(2):203-26
pubmed: 20990835
Surg Radiol Anat. 2006 Jun;28(3):284-92
pubmed: 16470343
J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Jul;7(7):1271-5
pubmed: 23998043
Anat Anz. 1983;154(1):1-31
pubmed: 6625181
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2010;23(1):63-7
pubmed: 20645646
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Sep;8(9):AC10-3
pubmed: 25386415
Surg Radiol Anat. 2007 Feb;29(1):5-7
pubmed: 17164987
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008 Mar;36(2):104-8
pubmed: 18280174
Ann Anat. 2016 May;205:16-21
pubmed: 26844627
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2007;108(3):141-3
pubmed: 17682541