Methods of identifying and recruiting older people at risk of social isolation and loneliness: a mixed methods review.
Loneliness
Older adults
Recruitment
Social isolation
Journal
BMC medical research methodology
ISSN: 1471-2288
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Res Methodol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968545
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 08 2019
29 08 2019
Historique:
received:
08
11
2018
accepted:
19
08
2019
entrez:
30
8
2019
pubmed:
30
8
2019
medline:
4
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Loneliness and social isolation are major determinants of mental wellbeing, especially among older adults. The effectiveness of interventions to address loneliness and social isolation among older adults has been questioned due to the lack of transparency in identifying and recruiting populations at risk. This paper aims to systematically review methods used to identify and recruit older people at risk of loneliness and social isolation into research studies that seek to address loneliness and social isolation. In total, 751 studies were identified from a structured search of eleven electronic databases combined with hand searching of reference bibliography from identified studies for grey literature. Studies conducted between January 1995 and December 2017 were eligible provided they recruited community living individuals aged 50 and above at risk of social isolation or loneliness into an intervention study. A total of 22 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion. Findings from these studies showed that the most common strategy for inviting people to participate in intervention studies were public-facing methods including mass media and local newspaper advertisements. The majority of participants identified this way were self-referred, and in many cases self-identified as lonely. In most cases, there was no standardised tool for defining loneliness or social isolation. However, studies that recruited via referral by recognised agencies reported higher rates of eligibility and enrolment. Referrals from primary care were only used in a few studies. Studies that included agency referral either alone or in combination with multiple forms of recruitment showed more promising recruitment rates than those that relied on only public facing methods. Further research is needed to establish the cost-effectiveness of multiple forms of referral. Findings from this study demonstrate the need for transparency in writing up the methods used to approach, assess and enrol older adults at risk of becoming socially isolated. None of the intervention studies included in this review justified their recruitment strategies. The ability of researchers to share best practice relies greatly on the transparency of research.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Loneliness and social isolation are major determinants of mental wellbeing, especially among older adults. The effectiveness of interventions to address loneliness and social isolation among older adults has been questioned due to the lack of transparency in identifying and recruiting populations at risk. This paper aims to systematically review methods used to identify and recruit older people at risk of loneliness and social isolation into research studies that seek to address loneliness and social isolation.
METHODS
In total, 751 studies were identified from a structured search of eleven electronic databases combined with hand searching of reference bibliography from identified studies for grey literature. Studies conducted between January 1995 and December 2017 were eligible provided they recruited community living individuals aged 50 and above at risk of social isolation or loneliness into an intervention study.
RESULT
A total of 22 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion. Findings from these studies showed that the most common strategy for inviting people to participate in intervention studies were public-facing methods including mass media and local newspaper advertisements. The majority of participants identified this way were self-referred, and in many cases self-identified as lonely. In most cases, there was no standardised tool for defining loneliness or social isolation. However, studies that recruited via referral by recognised agencies reported higher rates of eligibility and enrolment. Referrals from primary care were only used in a few studies. Studies that included agency referral either alone or in combination with multiple forms of recruitment showed more promising recruitment rates than those that relied on only public facing methods. Further research is needed to establish the cost-effectiveness of multiple forms of referral.
CONCLUSION
Findings from this study demonstrate the need for transparency in writing up the methods used to approach, assess and enrol older adults at risk of becoming socially isolated. None of the intervention studies included in this review justified their recruitment strategies. The ability of researchers to share best practice relies greatly on the transparency of research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31464586
doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0825-6
pii: 10.1186/s12874-019-0825-6
pmc: PMC6714404
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
181Références
BMC Med. 2010 Mar 24;8:18
pubmed: 20334633
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 08;11:218
pubmed: 21477273
Age Ageing. 2011 Nov;40(6):659-65
pubmed: 21911335
Aging Ment Health. 2007 Sep;11(5):496-504
pubmed: 17882587
Australas J Ageing. 2010 Dec;29(4):179-82
pubmed: 21179907
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2008 May;63(3):P176-84
pubmed: 18559683
Nurs Older People. 2005 Mar 1;17(1):40
pubmed: 27736564
BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 21;13:984
pubmed: 24139287
Aging Ment Health. 2002 Aug;6(3):213-21
pubmed: 12217089
BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 15;11:647
pubmed: 21843337
Lancet. 2016 Jun 4;387(10035):2323-2330
pubmed: 27059888
PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296
pubmed: 17941714
J Soc Pers Relat. 2017 Sep;34(6):793-811
pubmed: 28867863
Brain Behav Immun. 2012 Oct;26(7):1095-101
pubmed: 22820409
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 18;6(4):e010799
pubmed: 27091822
Public Health Nurs. 2001 Jan-Feb;18(1):54-63
pubmed: 11251874
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009 Jul;64(7):792-800
pubmed: 19223606
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Feb;21(2):199-205
pubmed: 26460594
Am J Health Promot. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(1):45-8
pubmed: 16977912
Prev Med. 2000 Nov;31(5):608-17
pubmed: 11071843
J Pers Assess. 1996 Feb;66(1):20-40
pubmed: 8576833
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Feb;65(2):297-305
pubmed: 19054177
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Nov-Dec;55(3):539-47
pubmed: 22564362
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 18;17(5):e122
pubmed: 25986724
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2015;58(4):338-56
pubmed: 25588026
Aging Ment Health. 2006 Sep;10(5):476-84
pubmed: 16938683
Aging Ment Health. 2014;18(6):683-93
pubmed: 24437736
Gerontologist. 2007 Jun;47(3):388-97
pubmed: 17565103