Aspirin better than clopidogrel on major adverse cardiovascular events reduction after ischemic stroke: A retrospective nationwide cohort study.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 19 06 2019
accepted: 14 08 2019
entrez: 30 8 2019
pubmed: 30 8 2019
medline: 5 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Several clinical trials reported that clopidogrel was superior to aspirin in secondary stroke prevention by reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We aimed to compare the efficacy of clopidogrel with aspirin in reducing one-year risk of MACE based on real-world evidence from Taiwan Health Insurance Database. We identified ischemic stroke patients between 2000 and 2012 who took aspirin or clopidogrel within 7 days of stroke onset for 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome was one-year MACE including recurrent stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and death. Propensity score matching and conditional Cox proportional hazards regression were conducted to control the confounding factors. From 9,089 ischemic stroke patients, we found 654 patients on aspirin and 465 patients on clopidogrel who met the selective inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, 379 patients were selected from each group. The clopidogrel group had a 1.78-fold MACE risk compared with the aspirin group at one-year follow-up (95% CI = 1.41-2.26, p<0.01). The MACE-free rate in the aspirin group was 15.74% higher than in the clopidogrel group at one-year follow-up. Sub-analysis of the three components of MACE showed that clopidogrel conferred higher risk of recurrent stroke (OR 1.43, 95% CI = 1.06-1.92, p 0.02) and acute myocardial infarction (OR 3.72, 95% CI = 1.04-13.3, p 0.04), but no different risk of death than that of aspirin. Among first-ever ischemic stroke patients, secondary stroke prevention using clopidogrel was associated with higher rates of MACE than aspirin. Aspirin might have better efficacy in secondary stroke prevention and was associated with lower risk of MACE. The real-world evidence raises the need to re-assess the current therapeutic options in secondary stroke prevention applying aspirin vs. clopidogrel.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Several clinical trials reported that clopidogrel was superior to aspirin in secondary stroke prevention by reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We aimed to compare the efficacy of clopidogrel with aspirin in reducing one-year risk of MACE based on real-world evidence from Taiwan Health Insurance Database.
METHODS
We identified ischemic stroke patients between 2000 and 2012 who took aspirin or clopidogrel within 7 days of stroke onset for 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome was one-year MACE including recurrent stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and death. Propensity score matching and conditional Cox proportional hazards regression were conducted to control the confounding factors.
RESULTS
From 9,089 ischemic stroke patients, we found 654 patients on aspirin and 465 patients on clopidogrel who met the selective inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, 379 patients were selected from each group. The clopidogrel group had a 1.78-fold MACE risk compared with the aspirin group at one-year follow-up (95% CI = 1.41-2.26, p<0.01). The MACE-free rate in the aspirin group was 15.74% higher than in the clopidogrel group at one-year follow-up. Sub-analysis of the three components of MACE showed that clopidogrel conferred higher risk of recurrent stroke (OR 1.43, 95% CI = 1.06-1.92, p 0.02) and acute myocardial infarction (OR 3.72, 95% CI = 1.04-13.3, p 0.04), but no different risk of death than that of aspirin.
CONCLUSIONS
Among first-ever ischemic stroke patients, secondary stroke prevention using clopidogrel was associated with higher rates of MACE than aspirin. Aspirin might have better efficacy in secondary stroke prevention and was associated with lower risk of MACE. The real-world evidence raises the need to re-assess the current therapeutic options in secondary stroke prevention applying aspirin vs. clopidogrel.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31465467
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221750
pii: PONE-D-19-17386
pmc: PMC6715172
doi:

Substances chimiques

Clopidogrel A74586SNO7
Aspirin R16CO5Y76E

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0221750

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Mol Cell Biochem. 1999 Sep;199(1-2):93-102
pubmed: 10544957
Am J Med. 1999 Dec;107(6):568-72
pubmed: 10625025
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(12):913-58
pubmed: 12222994
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22 Suppl 4:19-27
pubmed: 15876009
Am J Med. 2006 Aug;119(8):624-38
pubmed: 16887404
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 22;360(4):354-62
pubmed: 19106084
Stroke. 2009 Aug;40(8):2662-8
pubmed: 19556533
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 07;(4):CD001246
pubmed: 19821273
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8(4):251-65
pubmed: 20578780
Int J Stroke. 2010 Aug;5(4):306-18
pubmed: 20636714
Expert Rev Neurother. 2011 Feb;11(2):251-63
pubmed: 21306212
Acta Neurol Scand. 2013 Oct;128(4):213-9
pubmed: 23432706
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:903798
pubmed: 24669230
Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):2160-236
pubmed: 24788967
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 02;4(12):e006672
pubmed: 25468508
Circ Res. 2015 Apr 24;116(9):1509-26
pubmed: 25908725
JAMA. 2016 Jul 5;316(1):70-8
pubmed: 27348249
Circulation. 2017 Jan 3;135(1):21-33
pubmed: 27806998
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2293-2297
pubmed: 27959688
J Neurol Sci. 2017 May 15;376:112-116
pubmed: 28431593
Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2610-2613
pubmed: 28701574
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S86-S104
pubmed: 29222380
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Oct 2;7(19):e009856
pubmed: 30371321
Stroke. 2019 Jul;50(7):1812-1818
pubmed: 31177983
Stroke. 1994 Feb;25(2):333-7
pubmed: 8303740
Lancet. 1996 Nov 16;348(9038):1329-39
pubmed: 8918275
Stroke. 1998 Dec;29(12):2491-500
pubmed: 9836757

Auteurs

Amelia Nur Vidyanti (AN)

International Master/PhD Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Lung Chan (L)

Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Cheng-Li Lin (CL)

Management Office for Health Data, Clinical Trial Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Chih-Hsin Muo (CH)

Management Office for Health Data, Clinical Trial Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Chung Y Hsu (CY)

Department of Neurology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

You-Chia Chen (YC)

Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei, Taiwan.

Dean Wu (D)

Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
TMU Neuroscience Research Center-Sleep Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.

Chaur-Jong Hu (CJ)

Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Taipei Neuroscience Institute, Taipei, Taiwan.
The PhD Program for Neural Regenerative Medicine, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH