Comparison of posterior subthalamic area deep brain stimulation for tremor using conventional landmarks versus directly targeting the dentatorubrothalamic tract with tractography.
Activities of Daily Living
Adult
Aged
Cerebellar Nuclei
/ diagnostic imaging
Deep Brain Stimulation
/ methods
Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Double-Blind Method
Essential Tremor
/ physiopathology
Female
Humans
Implantable Neurostimulators
Male
Middle Aged
Parkinson Disease
/ physiopathology
Prosthesis Implantation
/ methods
Quality of Life
Red Nucleus
/ diagnostic imaging
Social Stigma
Social Support
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
Thalamus
/ diagnostic imaging
Treatment Outcome
Zona Incerta
Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography
Functional outcome
Posterior subthalamic area deep brain stimulation
Randomised study
Tremor
Journal
Clinical neurology and neurosurgery
ISSN: 1872-6968
Titre abrégé: Clin Neurol Neurosurg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7502039
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
23
04
2019
revised:
19
07
2019
accepted:
06
08
2019
pubmed:
30
8
2019
medline:
30
10
2020
entrez:
30
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare posterior subthalamic area deep brain stimulation (PSA-DBS) performed in the conventional manner against diffusion tensor imaging and tractography (DTIT)-guided lead implantation into the dentatorubrothalamic tract (DRTT). Double-blind, randomised study involving 34 patients with either tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease or essential tremor. Patients were randomised to Group A (DBS leads inserted using conventional landmarks) or Group B (leads guided into the DRTT using DTIT). Tremor (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin) and quality-of-life (PDQ-39) scores were evaluated 0-, 6-, 12-, 36- and 60-months after surgery. PSA-DBS resulted in marked tremor reduction in both groups. However, Group B patients had significantly better arm tremor control (especially control of intention tremor), increased mobility and activities of daily living, reduced social stigma and need for social support as well as lower stimulation amplitudes and pulse widths compared to Group A patients. The better outcomes were sustained for up to 60-months from surgery. The active contacts of Group B patients were consistently closer to the centre of the DRTT than in Group A. Speech problems were more common in Group A patients. DTIT-guided lead placement results in better and more stable tremor control and fewer adverse effects compared to lead placement in the conventional manner. This is because DTIT-guidance allows closer and more consistent placement of leads to the centre of the DRTT than conventional methods.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31466022
pii: S0303-8467(19)30262-8
doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105466
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105466Informations de copyright
Crown Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.