Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma of the head and neck: a multicentre study to examine safety, efficacy, and prognostic value.


Journal

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery
ISSN: 1532-1940
Titre abrégé: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 8405235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2019
Historique:
received: 01 06 2018
accepted: 26 07 2019
pubmed: 31 8 2019
medline: 31 3 2020
entrez: 31 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an accurate staging procedure for malignant melanoma but its use in patients with melanoma of the head and neck has been questioned in the past because of a perceived record of poor safety and accuracy. Technical improvements have sought to redress this. Vital structures and variable lymphatic pathways can make its use in the head and neck challenging. In our study we have examined the data and the experiences of clinicians from University Hospital Southampton and the Royal Surrey County Hospital. We retrospectively analysed the data and case notes of 143 patients who had SLNB to establish its safety, efficacy, and prognostic value. The detection rate of at least one sentinel lymph node was 100%. Nodes positive for metastatic melanoma were found in 20% of patients. Of them, 76% went on to have completion lymphadenectomy. Multivariate Cox regression analysis suggested that positive SLNB was a strong predictor of reduced overall survival for all Breslow-thickness melanomas (HR=3.9, p=0.019) and intermediate melanomas (HR=6.3, p=0.007). It predicted reduced recurrence-free survival for all melanomas (HR=7.4, p<0.001) and was a strong predictor for those of intermediate thickness (HR=8.3, p<0.001). The false negative rate was 9.4% and false omission rate 2.6%. Temporary and permanent morbidity rates were 2.1% and 0%, respectively. SLNB for melanoma in the head and neck is a safe, accurate staging procedure that offers prognostically useful information. The upstaging of disease allows access to trial-based targeted treatments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31466802
pii: S0266-4356(19)30309-2
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.07.022
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

891-897

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

B Passmore-Webb (B)

University of Southampton. Electronic address: passmorewebb@gmail.com.

B Gurney (B)

Royal Surrey County Hospital. Electronic address: ben.gurney@nhs.net.

H M Yuen (HM)

University of Southampton. Electronic address: H.M.Yuen@soton.ac.uk.

J Sloane (J)

Royal Surrey County Hospital. Electronic address: jamessloane@nhs.net.

J Lee (J)

University Hospital Southampton. Electronic address: jmlee010@googlemail.com.

M Proctor (M)

University Hospital Southampton. Electronic address: m.proctor153@gmail.com.

F Sundram (F)

University Hospital Southampton. Electronic address: Francis.Sundram@uhs.nhs.uk.

C Newlands (C)

Royal Surrey County Hospital. Electronic address: carrienewlands@googlemail.com.

S Sharma (S)

University Hospital Southampton. Electronic address: sanjay.sharma@uhs.nhs.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH