Horizontal and vertical self-paced saccades as a diagnostic marker of traumatic brain injury.
TBI
VOMS
concussion
eye tracking
horizontal saccades
vertical saccades
Journal
Concussion (London, England)
ISSN: 2056-3299
Titre abrégé: Concussion
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672433
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jul 2019
25 Jul 2019
Historique:
entrez:
31
8
2019
pubmed:
31
8
2019
medline:
31
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Eye tracking tests to measure horizontal and vertical saccades as a proxy for neural deficits associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) were evaluated in the present study. A total of 287 participants reporting either no TBI, mild, moderate or severe TBI participated in a suite of eye tracking tests to measure horizontal and vertical saccadic performance. The horizontal saccades test offered a sensitivity of 0.77 and a specificity of 0.78, similarly the vertical saccades tests offered a sensitivity of 0.64 and a specificity of 0.65. The results indicated that using eye-tracking technology to measure these metrics offers an objective, reliable and quantifiable way of differentiating between individuals with different severities of TBI, and those without a TBI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31467684
doi: 10.2217/cnc-2019-0001
pmc: PMC6714073
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
CNC60Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Financial & competing interests disclosure Melissa Hunfalvay, Ankur Tyagi and Takumi Bolte are all full-time employees with RightEye and have relevant affiliations and financial involvement. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
Références
J Neuroophthalmol. 1999 Sep;19(3):160-5
pubmed: 10494943
Prog Brain Res. 2002;140:433-48
pubmed: 12508607
Brain. 2004 Mar;127(Pt 3):575-90
pubmed: 14736751
Brain Inj. 2006 Jul;20(8):807-24
pubmed: 17060148
Neurosci Lett. 2007 Apr 24;417(1):61-5
pubmed: 17363165
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Aug;7(8):728-41
pubmed: 18635021
J Clin Neurosci. 1997 Apr;4(2):186-96
pubmed: 18638954
Brain Cogn. 2008 Dec;68(3):309-26
pubmed: 18848744
Brain. 2009 Oct;132(Pt 10):2850-70
pubmed: 19617197
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010 Jan;30(1):95-107
pubmed: 19682268
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Oct;1208:58-66
pubmed: 20955326
Neurology. 2011 Apr 26;76(17):1456-62
pubmed: 21288984
Brain Res. 2011 Jun 29;1398:55-63
pubmed: 21620377
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Mar;45(1):203-15
pubmed: 22806708
Vision Res. 2013 Sep 20;90:32-7
pubmed: 23416869
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 Apr;56(4):337-45
pubmed: 24350895
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2015 Jan-Feb;30(1):21-8
pubmed: 24695263
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2479-86
pubmed: 25106780
Brain Imaging Behav. 2015 Sep;9(3):564-73
pubmed: 25179246
J Neuroophthalmol. 2015 Mar;35(1):73-81
pubmed: 25675308
Muscle Nerve. 2015 Oct;52(4):554-8
pubmed: 25677583
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Feb;49(1):258-266
pubmed: 26705117
J Neurol Sci. 2016 Feb 15;361:79-86
pubmed: 26810521
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016 Summer;28(3):223-31
pubmed: 27019067
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Apr;40(4):E7
pubmed: 27032924
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;94(6):599-608
pubmed: 27130515
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2016 Nov-Dec;23(6):411-7
pubmed: 27182844
Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):e1186-e1193
pubmed: 27495819
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):474-479
pubmed: 27789472
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):213-227
pubmed: 28205131
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Mar 1;35(5):719-729
pubmed: 29239265
Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1475-1480
pubmed: 29513549
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 15;8(1):4583
pubmed: 29545567