Wound Photobiomodulation Treatment Outcomes in Animal Models.
Journal
Journal of veterinary medicine
ISSN: 2356-7708
Titre abrégé: J Vet Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101627989
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
06
04
2019
revised:
02
07
2019
accepted:
11
07
2019
entrez:
31
8
2019
pubmed:
31
8
2019
medline:
31
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The possibilities that photobiomodulation has brought on to the medical field are ever expanding and the scope it has reached is infinite. Determining how this relatively new treatment technique can be incorporated into the veterinary medical field is of interest to many medical professionals. In this review, we examine the treatment outcomes of low-level-laser therapy (LLLT) in different animal models to pinpoint any similarities between the studies. A search was conducted to identify LLLT studies using different animal models with an open or closed wound. The studies were compared to identify the laser parameters that resulted in positive treatment outcomes. The overall result of the studies examined indicated that daily laser exposure at a wavelength of a 600 or 800 nm range was the most beneficial across the rodent studies regardless of health status or wound type. More studies on rabbit, canine, and equine models are needed to explain the inconsistent results reviewed and find the correct treatment parameters for these species. Further research involving LLLT studies that focus on different factors including health status, treatment interval, wavelength, and energy density is needed to help validate our knowledge about the efficacy of using photobiomodulation in the veterinary medical field.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31467931
doi: 10.1155/2019/6320515
pmc: PMC6699315
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
6320515Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Equine Vet J. 1999 May;31(3):228-31
pubmed: 10402136
Vet Surg. 1999 Jul-Aug;28(4):292-5
pubmed: 10424710
Lasers Surg Med. 2000;26(1):41-7
pubmed: 10637002
Lasers Surg Med. 2001;28(3):220-6
pubmed: 11295756
J Vet Med Sci. 2007 Aug;69(8):799-806
pubmed: 17827885
Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Oct;39(9):706-15
pubmed: 17960752
J Int Med Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;37(5):1528-42
pubmed: 19930861
Acta Cir Bras. 2011 Apr;26(2):129-34
pubmed: 21445476
Ann Biomed Eng. 2012 Feb;40(2):516-33
pubmed: 22045511
J Photochem Photobiol B. 2012 Jun 4;111:1-8
pubmed: 22494918
N Am J Med Sci. 2011 Apr;3(4):193-7
pubmed: 22540090
Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Jan;29(1):257-65
pubmed: 23619627
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:269253
pubmed: 24551842
Photomed Laser Surg. 2014 Apr;32(4):198-204
pubmed: 24661084
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2014 Jan;7(1):14-7
pubmed: 24761093
Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Sep;29(5):1723-33
pubmed: 24801057
J Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Spring;5(2):58-62
pubmed: 25653800
Vet Surg. 2015 Nov;44(8):988-96
pubmed: 26447182
Lasers Surg Med. 1989;9(1):1-5
pubmed: 2648091
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2016 Jan-Feb;13(1):24-9
pubmed: 26962312
Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Nov;31(8):1683-1689
pubmed: 27495128
J Photochem Photobiol B. 2016 Nov;164:96-102
pubmed: 27661759
IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 2016 May-Jun;22(3):
pubmed: 28070154
Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Aug;32(6):1261-1267
pubmed: 28547073
Lasers Surg Med. 1989;9(1):50-8
pubmed: 2927230
Vet Surg. 2018 May;47(4):499-506
pubmed: 29655232
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Jan 29;5:349
pubmed: 30761311
Ann Plast Surg. 1987 Jan;18(1):47-50
pubmed: 3827131
Am J Surg. 1971 Oct;122(4):532-5
pubmed: 5098661
FEBS Lett. 1984 Sep 17;175(1):95-9
pubmed: 6479342
Lasers Surg Med. 1983;2(3):267-74
pubmed: 6843266
Lasers Surg Med. 1997;20(1):56-63
pubmed: 9041509