Does the chromosomal position of 35S rDNA sites influence their transcription? A survey on Nothoscordum species (Amaryllidaceae).
Journal
Genetics and molecular biology
ISSN: 1415-4757
Titre abrégé: Genet Mol Biol
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 100883590
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
03
07
2018
accepted:
21
03
2019
pubmed:
31
8
2019
medline:
31
8
2019
entrez:
31
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
35S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sites are the regions where the ribosomal genes 18S, 5.8S and 25S, responsible for the formation of the nucleoli, are found. The fact that rDNA sites have non-random distribution on chromosomes suggests that their positions may influence their transcription. To identify if the preferentially transcribed rDNA sites occupy specific position, six species (nine cytotypes) of the genus Nothoscordum were analyzed using two different techniques to impregnate the nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) with silver nitrate. Both techniques strongly stained NORs, but one of them also stained the proximal region of all chromosomes, suggesting the existence of another group of argentophilic proteins in this region. In species with rDNA sites in acrocentric and metacentric chromosomes, sites located on the short arms of the acrocentric chromosomes were preferentially activated. On the other hand, in species with rDNA sites restricted to the short arms of the acrocentrics, all of them were activated, whereas in those species with sites restricted to the terminal region of metacentric chromosomes, the frequency of active sites was always lower than expected. This indicate that, at least in Nothoscordum, the transcription of an rDNA site is influenced by its chromosomal position, and may explain, at least partially, the strongly non-random distribution of these sites in plant and animal chromosomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31469154
pii: S1415-47572019005040101
doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2018-0194
pmc: PMC7197985
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e20180194Références
Stain Technol. 1980 Mar;55(2):87-90
pubmed: 6157230
Chromosome Res. 1999;7(7):563-70
pubmed: 10598572
Chromosome Res. 2008;16(4):595-607
pubmed: 18431681
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2002;98(1):75-7
pubmed: 12584445
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010 Jun;22(3):351-6
pubmed: 20392622
EMBO Rep. 2010 Jan;11(1):52-8
pubmed: 20010804
Plant J. 1997 May;11(5):1007-16
pubmed: 9193072
Chromosoma. 1979 Jan 8;70(2):195-203
pubmed: 85512
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Nov 26;12:225
pubmed: 23181612
Trends Genet. 2011 Jun;27(6):207-16
pubmed: 21592609
Genes Dev. 2016 Jan 15;30(2):177-90
pubmed: 26744421
Biochem Soc Symp. 2006;(73):77-84
pubmed: 16626289
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008 Nov;1783(11):2116-23
pubmed: 18687368
Nucleus. 2017 Jan 2;8(1):11-16
pubmed: 27644794
Z Naturforsch C Biosci. 1979 Mar-Apr;34(3-4):253-8
pubmed: 156469
Mol Cell. 2008 Dec 5;32(5):673-84
pubmed: 19061642
Genome. 2000 Jun;43(3):574-9
pubmed: 10902723
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 May-Jun;1769(5-6):383-92
pubmed: 17439825
Genes Dev. 2016 Jul 15;30(14):1598-610
pubmed: 27474438
Stain Technol. 1988 Jul;63(4):235-40
pubmed: 2464210
Genet Mol Biol. 2009 Jan;32(1):111-6
pubmed: 21637654
Cell Rep. 2016 Aug 9;16(6):1574-1587
pubmed: 27477271
Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Mar;112(5):924-33
pubmed: 16397788
Genome. 2016 Feb;59(2):95-113
pubmed: 26853884
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2017;153(3):138-146
pubmed: 29393103
Biotech Histochem. 1991;1(2):69-78
pubmed: 1714766
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 22;113(47):13426-13431
pubmed: 27821753
Protoplasma. 2007;232(1-2):55-9
pubmed: 18157499
Ann Bot. 2012 Apr;109(5):987-99
pubmed: 22362660
Chromosoma. 2017 Aug;126(4):519-529
pubmed: 27834006
Ann Bot. 2008 Apr;101(6):815-23
pubmed: 18310159