Significant Differences in Body Plethysmography Measurements Between Hospitals in Patients Referred for Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bronchoscopy
Female
Forced Expiratory Volume
Humans
Lung
/ physiopathology
Male
Middle Aged
Netherlands
Observer Variation
Plethysmography, Whole Body
Predictive Value of Tests
Pulmonary Emphysema
/ diagnosis
Referral and Consultation
Reproducibility of Results
Residual Volume
Retrospective Studies
Severity of Illness Index
Unnecessary Procedures
Body plethysmography
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction
Emphysema
Residual volume
Journal
Lung
ISSN: 1432-1750
Titre abrégé: Lung
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7701875
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2019
10 2019
Historique:
received:
21
05
2019
accepted:
19
08
2019
pubmed:
2
9
2019
medline:
1
5
2020
entrez:
2
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
During the evaluation of potential bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) candidates in our hospital, we frequently observe patients with a lower residual volume (RV) value compared to the value measured in their referring hospital, although both measured by body plethysmography. We explored to what degree RV and other pulmonary function measurements match between referring hospitals and our hospital. We retrospectively analyzed a total of 300 patients with severe emphysema [38% male, median age 62 years (range 38-81), median forced expiratory volume in 1 s 29% (range 14-65) of predicted, and a median of 40 packyears (range 2-125)]. We measured a median RV of 4.47 l (range 1.70-7.57), which was a median 310 ml lower than in the referring hospitals (range - 3.04 to + 1.94), P < 0.001). In conclusion, this retrospective analysis demonstrated differences in RV measurements between different hospitals in patients with severe emphysema. Overestimation of RV can lead to unnecessary referrals for BLVR and potential treatment failures. To avoid disappointment and unnecessary hospital visits, it is important that body plethysmography measurements are accurately performed by applying preferably the unlinked method in these patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31473796
doi: 10.1007/s00408-019-00265-w
pii: 10.1007/s00408-019-00265-w
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
573-576Références
Respiration. 2016;91(4):273-80
pubmed: 26982496
Respiration. 2017;94(4):380-388
pubmed: 28817821
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Feb;5(2):147-156
pubmed: 27693408
Eur Respir J. 2005 Sep;26(3):511-22
pubmed: 16135736
Respiration. 2019;97(6):548-557
pubmed: 30836374
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012 Jun;47(6):588-96
pubmed: 22038839
Respiration. 2015;90(4):306-13
pubmed: 26352833
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Nov 1;198(9):1151-1164
pubmed: 29787288
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 10;373(24):2325-35
pubmed: 26650153
Chest. 1989 Jan;95(1):117-23
pubmed: 2909328
Eur Respir J. 2005 Aug;26(2):319-38
pubmed: 16055882
Med Phys. 2012 Mar;39(3):1650-62
pubmed: 22380397
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Apr 18;13:1269-1277
pubmed: 29713160
Eur Respir J. 2005 Sep;26(3):420-8
pubmed: 16135722
Eur Respir J. 2012 Nov;40(5):1137-41
pubmed: 22441742