Decreased total sperm counts in habitants of highly polluted areas of Eastern Sicily, Italy.
Air pollution
Male infertility
Oligozoospermia
Pollution
Sperm concentration
Sperm count
Journal
Environmental science and pollution research international
ISSN: 1614-7499
Titre abrégé: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9441769
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
21
04
2019
accepted:
16
08
2019
pubmed:
2
9
2019
medline:
8
1
2020
entrez:
2
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Air pollution has been suggested to affect semen quality, but the evidence is still contradictory. To assess whether any differences occur in conventional sperm parameters of men life-long resident in low, middle-low, middle, and high industrial density zones in the province of Messina. We retrospectively analyzed the conventional sperm parameters of patients to whom the sperm analysis was requested during their female partner counseling for infertility in an assisted reproductive technique (ART) center. A total of 184 men were enrolled. Total sperm count was higher in patients living in low and middle-low industrial density areas compared with that of men living in middle and high ones (123.5 ± 146.8 vs. 80.7 ± 92.7 mil/ejaculate, p < 0.05). No difference was found for sperm concentration (37.2 ± 49.7 vs. 30.5 ± 37.2 mil/mL), progressive motility (15.4 ± 19.8% vs. 14.2 ± 18.4%), total motility (62.3 ± 20.5 vs. 58.4 ± 19.9 mil/mL), and normal forms (2.7 ± 1.5 vs. 2.3 ± 3.0 mil/mL). These results add further evidence to findings from Sicilian population. Effective control of air pollution should be accomplished to prevent its negative impact on human reproductive health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31473922
doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06248-x
pii: 10.1007/s11356-019-06248-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
31368-31373Références
N Engl J Med. 2000 Dec 14;343(24):1742-9
pubmed: 11114312
Hum Reprod. 2007 Dec;22(12):3263; author reply 3264
pubmed: 17947377
Environ Pollut. 2014 Apr;187:145-52
pubmed: 24491300
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Aug;110(8):749-55
pubmed: 12153754
Eur J Endocrinol. 2010 Oct;163(4):509-13
pubmed: 20621957
Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Feb;118(2):203-9
pubmed: 20123611
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019 Apr 30;171:211-221
pubmed: 30611039
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 Apr 26;13:37
pubmed: 25928197
Fertil Steril. 2010 Apr;93(6):1875-9
pubmed: 19217100
Mol Med Rep. 2017 May;15(5):3398-3404
pubmed: 28350051
Environ Int. 2018 Dec;121(Pt 2):1297-1303
pubmed: 30389382
Environ Res. 2016 Oct;150:144-153
pubmed: 27288912
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Apr;32(4):509-20
pubmed: 25646893
Environ Pollut. 2016 Jan;208(Pt B):663-9
pubmed: 26552539
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;58:243-249
pubmed: 29448163
Fertil Steril. 2008 Feb;89(2 Suppl):e59-65
pubmed: 18308066
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2015 Jan;56(1):50-9
pubmed: 24989325
Hum Reprod. 2005 Oct;20(10):2776-83
pubmed: 15980006
Rev Environ Health. 2008 Oct-Dec;23(4):243-97
pubmed: 19235364
Asian J Androl. 2019 Sep-Oct;21(5):501-507
pubmed: 30688213
J Endocrinol Invest. 2011 Jun;34(6):e139-43
pubmed: 20959722
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Feb 1;505:32-8
pubmed: 25306093
Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Nov 1;23(6):646-659
pubmed: 28981654
Mutat Res. 2010 Jan 5;683(1-2):9-15
pubmed: 19800896
Nat Rev Urol. 2013 Jan;10(1):55-62
pubmed: 23229508
Indian J Exp Biol. 2010 May;48(5):425-35
pubmed: 20795359
Hum Reprod. 2010 Jun;25(6):1348-53
pubmed: 20395222
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Sep;108(9):887-94
pubmed: 11017895
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Feb 6;52(3):1571-1581
pubmed: 29320852
Environ Res. 2018 May;163:228-236
pubmed: 29459305