Impact of adhesive system generation and light curing units on orthodontic bonding: In vitro study.
Acid Etching, Dental
Bicuspid
Curing Lights, Dental
Dental Bonding
/ methods
Dental Cements
Dental Enamel
Dental Equipment
Humans
Light-Curing of Dental Adhesives
/ methods
Materials Testing
Orthodontic Brackets
Orthodontics
/ methods
Resin Cements
/ chemistry
Shear Strength
Stress, Mechanical
Surface Properties
Adhesive system generation
Attaches orthodontiques
Bracket bond
Colle
Forces
Génération de systèmes adhésifs
Light curing
Photopolymérisation
Journal
International orthodontics
ISSN: 1879-680X
Titre abrégé: Int Orthod
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101184882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
3
9
2019
medline:
29
9
2020
entrez:
3
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We aimed to compare adhesive performance of fourth, fifth and seventh generation adhesive systems (GASs) and the effect of two different light curing units on shear bond strength (SBS). One hundred and twenty extracted human upper premolars were divided in four groups. Bonds were assessed as following: group 1 using 4th GAS, group 2 using 5th GAS, group 3 and 4 using 7th GAS with two different light curing units (1500 and 800mw/cm Group 1 and 2 showed similar SBSs (P=0.7) which were significantly higher than group 3 (P=0.0002). Group 4 exhibited significantly the weakest SBS with mean=2.15±0.25. Applying shear forces less than 15MPa on group 3 bonds led to the release of almost all of the of brackets. Whereas, applying the same forces on group 2 bonds leads to the release of 66.7% of brackets. Notably, only 40% of brackets in group 1 were debonded. Group 4 brackets were totally debonded when applying shear forces less than 10MPa. While ARI=0 was the most frequent in group 1, ARI=3 was the most frequent in group 3. Fourth and fifth GASs showed similar SBS higher than seventh GAS. Fourth GAS bonds were able to resist longer against traction forces than those set up by fifth generation. Seventh GAS bonds offered the least efficient resistance. ARI=0 was the highest in group 1. However, Group 4 showed the highest ARI=1 and ARI=2 revealing cohesive failure. We also found that the adhesive power is proportional to the power of the lamp used. In fact, we concluded that 1500 mw/cm
Identifiants
pubmed: 31474511
pii: S1761-7227(19)30148-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.08.020
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Cements
0
Resin Cements
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
799-805Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 CEO. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.