Quantitative gait analysis for laser cue in Parkinson's disease patients with freezing of gait.
Parkinson’s disease (PD)
freezing of gait (FOG)
gait analysis
visual cue, laser
Journal
Annals of translational medicine
ISSN: 2305-5839
Titre abrégé: Ann Transl Med
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101617978
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
entrez:
3
9
2019
pubmed:
3
9
2019
medline:
3
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to investigate the gait spatiotemporal, kinematic, and kinetic changes of Parkinson's disease (PD) patient with freezing of gait (FOG) under the laser cue (LC). Such an approach may provide greater insight into the effects of LC on gait. Thirty-four PD with FOG (PD + FOG) and 32 healthy controls (HC) were tested in gait laboratory. Patients were tested at their usual self-selected speed in no laser cue (NC) first and then under LC condition. Sagittal plane kinematic and kinetic parameters of the lower-limb joints (hip, knee, and ankle joints) as well as spatiotemporal parameters (velocity, cadence, stride length, single and double support time), were measured. Spatiotemporal parameters and kinematic were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to explore difference among NC, LC, and HC. Covariance analysis was used to compare kinetic parameters. For PD + FOG, spatiotemporal parameters (stride length, velocity, and cadence) were significantly improved in LC (1.06±0.18, 1.01±0.19, 120±13.26, respectively) compared with NC (0.93±0.20, 0.87±0.17, 131±14.75) (P=0.027, 0.045, 0.035, respectively), and close to HC (1.1±0.12, 1.12±0.13, 116±9.37) (P=0.594, 0.276, 0.084, respectively). In kinematics, LC could significantly ameliorate the amplitude of maximal dorsiflexion in ankle (35.1±3.8), extension in stance in knee (16.8±4.3) and hip (4.43±5.1), as well as the range of motion (ROM) in ankle (33.15±6.1) and hip joints (38.6±3.3). In kinetics, LC also markedly improved power generation in ankle (2.03±1.52) and hip joints (1.08±0.48) and power absorption in pre-swing phase in knee joint (-1.68±0.29) compared with NC (1.37±1.13, 0.899±0.43, -1.31±0.27, respectively). LC significantly improves gait performance in spatiotemporal parameters as well as kinematics and kinetics performance in ankle and hip joints. LC may be promising when applied as an optional technique in the rehabilitation training in PD + FOG.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to investigate the gait spatiotemporal, kinematic, and kinetic changes of Parkinson's disease (PD) patient with freezing of gait (FOG) under the laser cue (LC). Such an approach may provide greater insight into the effects of LC on gait.
METHODS
METHODS
Thirty-four PD with FOG (PD + FOG) and 32 healthy controls (HC) were tested in gait laboratory. Patients were tested at their usual self-selected speed in no laser cue (NC) first and then under LC condition. Sagittal plane kinematic and kinetic parameters of the lower-limb joints (hip, knee, and ankle joints) as well as spatiotemporal parameters (velocity, cadence, stride length, single and double support time), were measured. Spatiotemporal parameters and kinematic were submitted to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to explore difference among NC, LC, and HC. Covariance analysis was used to compare kinetic parameters.
RESULTS
RESULTS
For PD + FOG, spatiotemporal parameters (stride length, velocity, and cadence) were significantly improved in LC (1.06±0.18, 1.01±0.19, 120±13.26, respectively) compared with NC (0.93±0.20, 0.87±0.17, 131±14.75) (P=0.027, 0.045, 0.035, respectively), and close to HC (1.1±0.12, 1.12±0.13, 116±9.37) (P=0.594, 0.276, 0.084, respectively). In kinematics, LC could significantly ameliorate the amplitude of maximal dorsiflexion in ankle (35.1±3.8), extension in stance in knee (16.8±4.3) and hip (4.43±5.1), as well as the range of motion (ROM) in ankle (33.15±6.1) and hip joints (38.6±3.3). In kinetics, LC also markedly improved power generation in ankle (2.03±1.52) and hip joints (1.08±0.48) and power absorption in pre-swing phase in knee joint (-1.68±0.29) compared with NC (1.37±1.13, 0.899±0.43, -1.31±0.27, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
LC significantly improves gait performance in spatiotemporal parameters as well as kinematics and kinetics performance in ankle and hip joints. LC may be promising when applied as an optional technique in the rehabilitation training in PD + FOG.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31475194
doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.05.87
pii: atm-07-14-324
pmc: PMC6694277
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
324Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Brain. 1999 Jan;122 ( Pt 1):111-20
pubmed: 10050899
Mov Disord. 2000 Mar;15(2):309-12
pubmed: 10752582
Brain. 2000 Oct;123 ( Pt 10):2077-90
pubmed: 11004125
Med Sci Monit. 2004 Jul;10(7):CR282-4
pubmed: 15232500
Mov Disord. 2005 Jan;20(1):40-50
pubmed: 15390033
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 May;86(5):1007-13
pubmed: 15895349
Neurology. 1992 Jun;42(6):1142-6
pubmed: 1603339
Phys Ther. 2006 Feb;86(2):186-94
pubmed: 16445332
Brain. 2008 Aug;131(Pt 8):2094-105
pubmed: 18577547
Brain. 2009 Aug;132(Pt 8):2151-60
pubmed: 19433440
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Nov;90(11):1880-6
pubmed: 19887212
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2011 May;17(4):240-5
pubmed: 20817535
J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Jun;18(6):798-802
pubmed: 21507659
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jan;91(1):2-11
pubmed: 22157432
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):1046-51
pubmed: 22440486
Neurologist. 2012 Sep;18(5):298-301
pubmed: 22931738
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(2):223-30
pubmed: 23761003
Neuroscience. 2014 Sep 26;277:273-80
pubmed: 25065625
Funct Neurol. 2014 Apr-Jun;29(2):99-105
pubmed: 25306119
Lancet Neurol. 2015 Jul;14(7):768-78
pubmed: 26018593
Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(7):518-26
pubmed: 26395829
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984 May;47(5):496-9
pubmed: 6736981
Brain. 1994 Oct;117 ( Pt 5):1169-81
pubmed: 7953597
Adv Neurol. 1995;67:53-63
pubmed: 8848982
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1996 Nov;51(6):M303-12
pubmed: 8914503
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Mar;79(3):317-22
pubmed: 9523785