Gestational weight gain outside the Institute of Medicine recommendations and adverse pregnancy outcomes: analysis using individual participant data from randomised trials.
Cesarean Section
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Fetal Growth Retardation
/ epidemiology
Fetal Macrosomia
/ epidemiology
Gestational Weight Gain
Guidelines as Topic
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Small for Gestational Age
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division
Obesity, Maternal
/ epidemiology
Odds Ratio
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
/ epidemiology
Premature Birth
/ epidemiology
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
United States
Body mass index
Gestational weight gain
Individual participant data
Institute of Medicine
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Sep 2019
02 Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
23
04
2018
accepted:
22
08
2019
entrez:
4
9
2019
pubmed:
4
9
2019
medline:
15
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
High Body Mass Index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) affect an increasing number of pregnancies. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has issued recommendations on the optimal GWG for women according to their pre-pregnancy BMI (healthy, overweight or obese). It has been shown that pregnant women rarely met the recommendations; however, it is unclear by how much. Previous studies also adjusted the analyses for various women's characteristics making their comparison challenging. We analysed individual participant data (IPD) of healthy women with a singleton pregnancy and a BMI of 18.5 kg/m Out of 4429 women (from 33 trials) meeting the inclusion criteria, two thirds gained weight outside the IOM recommendations (1646 above; 1291 below). The median GWG outside the IOM recommendations was 3.1 kg above and 2.7 kg below. In comparison to GWG within the IOM recommendations, GWG above was associated with increased odds of caesarean section (aOR 1.50; 95%CI 1.25, 1.80), LGA (2.00; 1.58, 2.54), and reduced odds of SGA (0.66; 0.50, 0.87); no significant effect on preterm birth was detected. The relationship between GWG below the IOM recommendation and caesarean section or LGA was inconclusive; however, the odds of preterm birth (1.94; 1.31, 2.28) and SGA (1.52; 1.18, 1.96) were increased. Consistently with previous findings, adherence to the IOM recommendations seem to help achieve better pregnancy outcomes. Nevertheless, even in the context of clinical trials, women find it difficult to adhere to them. Further research should focus on identifying ways of achieving a healthier GWG as defined by the IOM recommendations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
High Body Mass Index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) affect an increasing number of pregnancies. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has issued recommendations on the optimal GWG for women according to their pre-pregnancy BMI (healthy, overweight or obese). It has been shown that pregnant women rarely met the recommendations; however, it is unclear by how much. Previous studies also adjusted the analyses for various women's characteristics making their comparison challenging.
METHODS
METHODS
We analysed individual participant data (IPD) of healthy women with a singleton pregnancy and a BMI of 18.5 kg/m
RESULTS
RESULTS
Out of 4429 women (from 33 trials) meeting the inclusion criteria, two thirds gained weight outside the IOM recommendations (1646 above; 1291 below). The median GWG outside the IOM recommendations was 3.1 kg above and 2.7 kg below. In comparison to GWG within the IOM recommendations, GWG above was associated with increased odds of caesarean section (aOR 1.50; 95%CI 1.25, 1.80), LGA (2.00; 1.58, 2.54), and reduced odds of SGA (0.66; 0.50, 0.87); no significant effect on preterm birth was detected. The relationship between GWG below the IOM recommendation and caesarean section or LGA was inconclusive; however, the odds of preterm birth (1.94; 1.31, 2.28) and SGA (1.52; 1.18, 1.96) were increased.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Consistently with previous findings, adherence to the IOM recommendations seem to help achieve better pregnancy outcomes. Nevertheless, even in the context of clinical trials, women find it difficult to adhere to them. Further research should focus on identifying ways of achieving a healthier GWG as defined by the IOM recommendations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31477075
doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2472-7
pii: 10.1186/s12884-019-2472-7
pmc: PMC6719382
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
322Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : not available
Pays : International
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-0407-10452
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Health Technology Assessment Programme
ID : 12/01/50
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 12/01/50
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Investigateurs
Arne Astrup
(A)
Ruben C Barakat
(RC)
Annick Bogaerts
(A)
Jose G Cecatti
(JG)
Jodie M Dodd
(JM)
Arri Coomarasamy
(A)
Roland Devlieger
(R)
Nermean El Beltagy
(N)
Fabio Facchinetti
(F)
Nina R W Geiker
(NRW)
Kym Guelfi
(K)
Lene A H Haakstad
(LAH)
Cheryce Harrison
(C)
Hans Hauner
(H)
Dorte M Jensen
(DM)
Tarja I Kinnunen
(TI)
Khalid S Khan
(KS)
Janette Khoury
(J)
Riitta Luoto
(R)
Ben W Mol
(BW)
Siv Mørkved
(S)
Narges Motahari
(N)
Fionnuala McAuliffe
(F)
Julie Owens
(J)
Maria Perales
(M)
Elisabetta Petrella
(E)
Suzanne Phelan
(S)
Lucilla Poston
(L)
Mireille van Poppel
(M)
Kathrin Rauh
(K)
Kristina M Renault
(KM)
Ewelina Rogozińska
(E)
Linda R Sagedal
(LR)
Kjell A Salvesen
(KA)
Tânia T Scudeller
(TT)
Gary X Shen
(GX)
Alexis Shub
(A)
Signe N Stafne
(SN)
Fernanda Surita
(F)
Helena Teede
(H)
Shakila Thangaratinam
(S)
Serena Tonstad
(S)
Christina A Vinter
(CA)
Ingvild Vistad
(I)
Marcia Vitolo
(M)
Seonae Yeo
(S)
Références
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;201(4):339.e1-14
pubmed: 19788965
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):267-77
pubmed: 24275499
Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 6;6(1):243
pubmed: 29208048
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;21(6):521-6
pubmed: 19809317
Obes Rev. 2015 Mar;16(3):189-206
pubmed: 25598037
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;200(3):271.e1-7
pubmed: 19136091
Women Birth. 2015 Sep;28(3):e70-9
pubmed: 25866207
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Jun;201:203-8
pubmed: 27160501
BMJ Open. 2016 May 10;6(5):e010667
pubmed: 27165646
BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(2):199-206
pubmed: 26840538
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Apr;21(4):705-714
pubmed: 27449649
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 05;11(2):e0148343
pubmed: 26849801
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(2):190-8
pubmed: 26841002
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Jun;91(6):1642-8
pubmed: 20357043
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;202(6):574.e1-8
pubmed: 20132923
Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Mar;18(1):269-74
pubmed: 2656561
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;110(4):745-51
pubmed: 17906004
BMJ. 2016 Feb 29;352:i555
pubmed: 26926301
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8):865-873.e4
pubmed: 23651765
Obstet Med. 2015 Sep;8(3):133-7
pubmed: 27512468
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Dec;33(12):1223-1233
pubmed: 22166276
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995;854:1-452
pubmed: 8594834
BJOG. 2017 May;124(6):863-871
pubmed: 28194870
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Apr;167(2):149-53
pubmed: 23266206
Pediatr Res. 2011 Feb;69(2):175-80
pubmed: 21076366
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;110(4):759-64
pubmed: 17906006
Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 04;3:131
pubmed: 25370505
JAMA. 2017 Jun 06;317(21):2207-2225
pubmed: 28586887
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Oct;110(4):752-8
pubmed: 17906005
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Aug;21(41):1-158
pubmed: 28795682
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Dec;90(6):1552-8
pubmed: 19812177
Obes Rev. 2013 Jan;14(1):68-85
pubmed: 23107337
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Mar;23(3):507-11
pubmed: 25521748
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Jun;19(6):1348-53
pubmed: 25424453
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;118(2 Pt 1):305-312
pubmed: 21775846
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;121(5):969-975
pubmed: 23635732
Stat Med. 2006 Jun 30;25(12):2136-59
pubmed: 16217847
Epidemiol Rev. 2000;22(2):261-74
pubmed: 11218377
Reproduction. 2010 Sep;140(3):387-98
pubmed: 20562299
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 27;10(8):e0136850
pubmed: 26313941
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;115(3):597-604
pubmed: 20177292
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Jun;48(3):228-35
pubmed: 18532950
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;214(6):745.e1-5
pubmed: 26719212
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Aug;18(12):2172-82
pubmed: 25411780
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Sep;90(9):935-54
pubmed: 21623738
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Sep;19(9):2066-73
pubmed: 25652068
Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 Oct;40(10):1529-1534
pubmed: 27200502
Ann Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;21(2):78-85
pubmed: 20702110
Epidemiology. 2006 Mar;17(2):170-7
pubmed: 16477257