N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Adult
Ambulatory Care
Female
Health Personnel
Humans
Incidence
Infection Control
/ methods
Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional
/ prevention & control
Influenza, Human
/ diagnosis
Male
Masks
Middle Aged
Occupational Exposure
Respiratory Protective Devices
Respiratory Tract Infections
/ prevention & control
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 09 2019
03 09 2019
Historique:
entrez:
4
9
2019
pubmed:
4
9
2019
medline:
27
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Clinical studies have been inconclusive about the effectiveness of N95 respirators and medical masks in preventing health care personnel (HCP) from acquiring workplace viral respiratory infections. To compare the effect of N95 respirators vs medical masks for prevention of influenza and other viral respiratory infections among HCP. A cluster randomized pragmatic effectiveness study conducted at 137 outpatient study sites at 7 US medical centers between September 2011 and May 2015, with final follow-up in June 2016. Each year for 4 years, during the 12-week period of peak viral respiratory illness, pairs of outpatient sites (clusters) within each center were matched and randomly assigned to the N95 respirator or medical mask groups. Overall, 1993 participants in 189 clusters were randomly assigned to wear N95 respirators (2512 HCP-seasons of observation) and 2058 in 191 clusters were randomly assigned to wear medical masks (2668 HCP-seasons) when near patients with respiratory illness. The primary outcome was the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza. Secondary outcomes included incidence of acute respiratory illness, laboratory-detected respiratory infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory illness, and influenzalike illness. Adherence to interventions was assessed. Among 2862 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 43 [11.5] years; 2369 [82.8%]) women), 2371 completed the study and accounted for 5180 HCP-seasons. There were 207 laboratory-confirmed influenza infection events (8.2% of HCP-seasons) in the N95 respirator group and 193 (7.2% of HCP-seasons) in the medical mask group (difference, 1.0%, [95% CI, -0.5% to 2.5%]; P = .18) (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.18 [95% CI, 0.95-1.45]). There were 1556 acute respiratory illness events in the respirator group vs 1711 in the mask group (difference, -21.9 per 1000 HCP-seasons [95% CI, -48.2 to 4.4]; P = .10); 679 laboratory-detected respiratory infections in the respirator group vs 745 in the mask group (difference, -8.9 per 1000 HCP-seasons, [95% CI, -33.3 to 15.4]; P = .47); 371 laboratory-confirmed respiratory illness events in the respirator group vs 417 in the mask group (difference, -8.6 per 1000 HCP-seasons [95% CI, -28.2 to 10.9]; P = .39); and 128 influenzalike illness events in the respirator group vs 166 in the mask group (difference, -11.3 per 1000 HCP-seasons [95% CI, -23.8 to 1.3]; P = .08). In the respirator group, 89.4% of participants reported "always" or "sometimes" wearing their assigned devices vs 90.2% in the mask group. Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01249625.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31479137
pii: 2749214
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.11645
pmc: PMC6724169
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01249625']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
824-833Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4:CD002929
pubmed: 27115326
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2017 Nov;11(6):511-517
pubmed: 28799710
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10 Suppl 2):S65-164
pubmed: 18068815
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Feb 15;60(4):499-504
pubmed: 25414260
JAMA. 2009 Nov 4;302(17):1865-71
pubmed: 19797474
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(8):D97-D103
pubmed: 23767796
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Jan;43(1):63-71
pubmed: 25564126
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 May 1;187(9):960-6
pubmed: 23413265
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2011 May;5(3):170-9
pubmed: 21477136
Clin Trials. 2004;1(3):297-305
pubmed: 16279255
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Nov 1;45(11):1254-1258
pubmed: 28526310
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2011 Mar;25(1):227-44
pubmed: 21316002
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jan;51(1):40-5
pubmed: 23077123
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 13;65(11):1934-1942
pubmed: 29140516
Am J Infect Control. 2009 Jun;37(5):417-419
pubmed: 19216002
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Mar;20(1):40-9
pubmed: 21499542
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 May 1;187(9):904-5
pubmed: 23634856
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54(11):1569-77
pubmed: 22460981
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002 Oct;23(10):615-9
pubmed: 12400893
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Oct;48(10):3492-5
pubmed: 20702662
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 02;16:243
pubmed: 27255755
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):454-63
pubmed: 27518663
CMAJ. 2016 May 17;188(8):567-574
pubmed: 26952529