The Effect of Group Composition and Mineral Supplementation during Rearing on Measures of Cartilage Condition and Bone Mineral Density in Replacement Gilts.
cartilage
cartilage lesions
gilt
health
lameness
nutrition
osteochondrosis
welfare
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Aug 2019
30 Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
18
06
2019
revised:
08
08
2019
accepted:
20
08
2019
entrez:
5
9
2019
pubmed:
5
9
2019
medline:
5
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lameness is a major cause of poor longevity and poor welfare in replacement gilts. The problem is exacerbated by inappropriate housing and diet during the rearing period. Replacement gilts are often reared with male finisher pigs destined for slaughter. If they are not castrated, they perform high levels of potentially injurious sexual and aggressive behaviour. Furthermore, finisher pig diets are not designed to meet the needs of developing gilts and may not supply the necessary minerals to support good limb health. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplementing the diet of replacement gilts with copper, zinc and manganese and separating them from males during the rearing period on locomotory ability, bone mineral density and cartilage lesion scores. A 2 × 2 factorial design experiment investigated the effect of female-only or mixed-sex rearing, with or without supplementary minerals (Copper, Zinc and Manganese). In total, 384 maternal line gilts were assigned to 32 pens of 12 and were locomotion scored during the rearing period. A sub-sample (n = 102) of gilts were culled at breeding age and the front right limb was removed at slaughter. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, after which the limb was dissected to score the condition of the cartilage. The addition of trace minerals to the diet resulted in increased aBMD in the humerus (
Identifiants
pubmed: 31480340
pii: ani9090637
doi: 10.3390/ani9090637
pmc: PMC6770507
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Teagasc
ID : GiltLife 0012
Références
Poult Sci. 2009 Jan;88(1):118-31
pubmed: 19096066
J Anim Sci. 2013 Aug;91(8):3940-54
pubmed: 23881683
Zentralbl Veterinarmed A. 1995 Oct;42(8):489-504
pubmed: 8592895
Can J Vet Res. 1987 Oct;51(4):506-12
pubmed: 3453273
J Anim Sci. 2013 Mar;91(3):1255-69
pubmed: 23296836
Prev Vet Med. 2009 Jun 1;89(3-4):167-77
pubmed: 19329202
Animal. 2013 Jun;7(6):1017-27
pubmed: 23253104
Bone. 2002 May;30(5):781-6
pubmed: 11996920
Br J Sports Med. 2005 Sep;39(9):622-7; discussion 627
pubmed: 16118299
J Anim Sci. 2008 Nov;86(11):3166-80
pubmed: 18567722
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Feb 1;113(2):268-72
pubmed: 24331733
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Apr;87(4):797-809
pubmed: 15259213
Vet Rec. 2009 Mar 28;164(13):388-92
pubmed: 19329807
Acta Vet Scand. 1974;15(1):61-79
pubmed: 4830072
Vet Rec. 2000 Nov 11;147(20):574-6
pubmed: 11104042
Animals (Basel). 2019 Aug 30;9(9):
pubmed: 31480340
J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2005 Oct;52(8):423-8
pubmed: 16176574
J Anim Sci. 1991 Feb;69(2):646-55
pubmed: 2016194
Animal. 2010 Nov;4(11):1922-8
pubmed: 22445153
Vet Pathol. 2007 Jul;44(4):429-48
pubmed: 17606505
J Nutr. 1999 Jan;129(1):188-93
pubmed: 9915898
Acta Vet Scand. 2008 Jul 01;50:25
pubmed: 18593470
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Sep;68(7):1090-3
pubmed: 3745249
J Anim Sci. 2001 Oct;79(10):2594-604
pubmed: 11721838
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90(13):4752-63
pubmed: 22871924
Can Vet J. 1993 Sep;34(9):555-6
pubmed: 17424287
Animal. 2007 Jun;1(5):708-15
pubmed: 22444471
Vet Rec. 2006 Sep 16;159(12):383-7
pubmed: 16980524
J Anim Sci. 2006 May;84(5):1138-46
pubmed: 16612016
Acta Vet Scand. 1995;36(4):451-9
pubmed: 8669373
Acta Vet Scand. 2008 Feb 28;50:5
pubmed: 18307783
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Mar;17(2):203-10
pubmed: 23776890
J Anim Sci. 1981 May;52(5):1070-84
pubmed: 7240048
J Anim Sci. 2018 Jul 28;96(8):3274-3287
pubmed: 29767794