Associations between Pre-Slaughter and Post-Slaughter Indicators of Animal Welfare in Cull Cows.

carcass bruising carcass condemnations cow health culled cows welfare at slaughter

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Sep 2019
Historique:
received: 18 07 2019
revised: 28 08 2019
accepted: 29 08 2019
entrez: 5 9 2019
pubmed: 5 9 2019
medline: 5 9 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The objective of this study was to evaluate the welfare of cull cows in a slaughtering plant, using indicators of health on arrival and indicators of handling during the stunning process. These pre-slaughter indicators were associated with post-slaughter indicators of the same cows, such as carcass bruising and condemnations. Transport staff surveys showed that all drivers had been trained on animal welfare. All loads of cows came directly from farms and had an average transport duration of 5 h 22 min. Indicators were registered in 237 cows during unloading at the slaughterhouse and in the stunning box. Bruises and condemnations were recorded post-slaughter in the carcasses of the same cows. Results at arrival showed that 48% of the cows had low body condition, 50% had mammary problems, and 24% suffered from lameness. During stunning, 16% of cows needed a second shot, and 54% exceeded the 60 s established as a recommended interval between stunning and bleeding. During the post-slaughter evaluation, 50% of the carcasses had more than two bruises and 70.46% had a bruise severity score different from zero. Low body condition was a risk factor to increase the severity of bruises; low body condition and mammary problems increased carcass condemnations; the stunning process indicators were not statistically associated with the severity of the bruises. For cull cows the main animal welfare issue originates at farm level.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31480736
pii: ani9090642
doi: 10.3390/ani9090642
pmc: PMC6770700
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Res Vet Sci. 2017 Aug;113:62-66
pubmed: 28892662
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jul 20;8(7):
pubmed: 30037055
J Anim Sci. 2017 Apr;95(4):1528-1536
pubmed: 28464078
Animal. 2013 Mar;7(3):485-91
pubmed: 23046510
Meat Sci. 2010 Nov;86(3):859-64
pubmed: 20696532
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Nov 22;5:297
pubmed: 30525051
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Mar;98(3):1730-8
pubmed: 25547306
Animal. 2016 Feb;10(2):357-64
pubmed: 26251114
J Anim Sci. 2012 Oct;90(10):3640-51
pubmed: 22665659
Vet J. 2012 Oct;194(1):94-7
pubmed: 22516921
Animal. 2018 Jul;12(7):1462-1474
pubmed: 29557318
Meat Sci. 2008 Sep;80(1):12-9
pubmed: 22063165
Meat Sci. 2018 Apr;138:34-48
pubmed: 29291504
Animal. 2012 Mar;6(3):502-9
pubmed: 22436230
Meat Sci. 2010 Sep;86(1):56-65
pubmed: 20599326

Auteurs

Melissa Sánchez-Hidalgo (M)

Instituto de Ciencia Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, OIE Collaborating Centre for Animal Welfare and Livestock Production Systems-Chile, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.
Escuela de Graduados, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.

Carla Rosenfeld (C)

Instituto de Medicina Preventiva, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile.

Carmen Gallo (C)

Instituto de Ciencia Animal, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, OIE Collaborating Centre for Animal Welfare and Livestock Production Systems-Chile, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5090000, Chile. cgallo@uach.cl.

Classifications MeSH