Success of Montreal Protocol Demonstrated by Comparing High-Quality UV Measurements with "World Avoided" Calculations from Two Chemistry-Climate Models.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 09 2019
Historique:
received: 22 05 2019
accepted: 05 08 2019
entrez: 5 9 2019
pubmed: 5 9 2019
medline: 5 9 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer has been hailed as the most successful environmental treaty ever ( https://www.unenvironment.org/news-and-stories/story/montreal-protocol-triumph-treaty ). Yet, although our main concern about ozone depletion is the subsequent increase in harmful solar UV radiation at the Earth's surface, no studies to date have demonstrated its effectiveness in that regard. Here we use long-term UV Index (UVI) data derived from high-quality UV spectroradiometer measurements to demonstrate its success in curbing increases in UV radiation. Without this landmark agreement, UVI values would have increased at mid-latitude locations by approximately 20% between the early 1990s and today and would approximately quadruple at mid-latitudes by 2100. In contrast, an analysis of UVI data from multiple clean-air sites shows that maximum daily UVI values have remained essentially constant over the last ~20 years in all seasons, and may even have decreased slightly in the southern hemisphere, especially in Antarctica, where effects of ozone depletion were larger. Reconstructions of the UVI from total ozone data show evidence of increasing UVI levels in the 1980s, but unfortunately, there are no high-quality UV measurements available prior to the early 1990s to confirm these increases with direct observations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31481668
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48625-z
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-48625-z
pmc: PMC6722083
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

12332

Références

Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2019 Mar 1;18(3):602-640
pubmed: 30810565
J Photochem Photobiol B. 1992 Apr 30;13(2):187-90
pubmed: 1506990
Nature. 2018 May;557(7705):413-417
pubmed: 29769666
Nature. 1996 Nov 21;384(6606):256-8
pubmed: 8918873
Nat Commun. 2015 May 26;6:7233
pubmed: 26011106
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2011 Jul;10(7):1152-60
pubmed: 21455537
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2006 Mar;5(3):343-52
pubmed: 16520871
Appl Opt. 1988 Jun 15;27(12):2502-9
pubmed: 20531783

Auteurs

Richard McKenzie (R)

National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Lauder, New Zealand. richard.mckenzie@niwa.co.nz.

Germar Bernhard (G)

Biospherical Instruments Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

Ben Liley (B)

National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Lauder, New Zealand.

Patrick Disterhoft (P)

CIRES-University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
NOAA Global Monitoring Division - Radiation Group, Boulder, CO, USA.

Steve Rhodes (S)

Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia.

Alkiviadis Bais (A)

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Olaf Morgenstern (O)

National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Lauder, New Zealand.
National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Wellington, New Zealand.

Paul Newman (P)

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.

Luke Oman (L)

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.

Colette Brogniez (C)

Univ. Lille, CNRS, UMR 8515 - Laboratoire d'Optique Atmosphérique, F-59000, Lille, France.

Stana Simic (S)

Universität für Bodenkultur, Vienna, Austria.

Classifications MeSH