Tachyphylaxis during treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration with aflibercept.
Aged
Female
Fluorescein Angiography
/ methods
Follow-Up Studies
Fundus Oculi
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Male
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
/ administration & dosage
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
/ administration & dosage
Retinal Pigment Epithelium
/ pathology
Retrospective Studies
Tachyphylaxis
Tomography, Optical Coherence
/ methods
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Wet Macular Degeneration
/ diagnosis
Aflibercept
Age-related macular degeneration
Photodynamic therapy
Ranibizumab
Tachyphylaxis
Journal
Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie
ISSN: 1435-702X
Titre abrégé: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8205248
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
02
07
2019
accepted:
27
08
2019
revised:
18
08
2019
pubmed:
5
9
2019
medline:
13
2
2020
entrez:
5
9
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
At present, the standard treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the repeated administration of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. However, we often encounter patients who develop tachyphylaxis for anti-VEGF agents. In this study, we investigated the characteristics of patients who developed tachyphylaxis on repeated intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) injections for neovascular AMD and the frequency of tachyphylaxis. Three hundred thirteen eyes (313 patients) with treatment-naïve AMD who achieved resolution soon after starting IVA and were followed up for ≥ 12 months were enrolled in this retrospective, interventional, consecutive case series. The eyes were investigated for tachyphylaxis to aflibercept. Tachyphylaxis was defined as absence of any improvement (more than 100 μm) in or worsening of CRT within 1 month after more than two repeated monthly IVA injections when the exudative change remained. Twenty-eight (8.9%) of the 313 eyes developed tachyphylaxis (occult with no classic, n = 14; polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, n = 14) at an annual rate of about 3%. The mean number of IVA injections was 10.5 ± 7.8, and the mean interval until tachyphylaxis was 20.9 ± 14.0 months. There was a significant difference in the AMD subtypes between the group with tachyphylaxis and the group without it (p = 0.0029). Occult with no classic type and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy were the only AMD subtypes in the eyes with tachyphylaxis. In the analysis of the eyes that had occult with no classic or polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, only intraretinal edema was significantly less common (p = 0.042). A combination of photodynamic therapy and aflibercept was effective in 13 (87%) of 15 eyes with tachyphylaxis, and switching to intravitreal ranibizumab was effective in 5 (56%) of 9 eyes. Tachyphylaxis occurs after repeated IVA injections in a minority of patients with AMD for a long term and is more likely to occur in eyes with lesions beneath the retinal pigment epithelium and no intraretinal edema. Treatment of AMD should be performed keeping this fact in mind, while considering the consecutive treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31482277
doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04456-2
pii: 10.1007/s00417-019-04456-2
doi:
Substances chimiques
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
aflibercept
15C2VL427D
Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
EC 2.7.10.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2559-2569Références
Retina. 2010 Oct;30(9):1333-49
pubmed: 20924258
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;254(4):639-44
pubmed: 26092633
Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;97(8):1032-5
pubmed: 23766432
Ophthalmology. 1996 Mar;103(3):427-38
pubmed: 8600419
Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Oct;93(18):e116
pubmed: 25319441
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;99(1):92-7
pubmed: 25107900
Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;89(2):e206-7
pubmed: 19900197
Angiogenesis. 2015 Oct;18(4):397-432
pubmed: 26346237
Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Sep;122(3):393-403
pubmed: 8794712
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 5;355(14):1419-31
pubmed: 17021318
Ophthalmology. 2002 Oct;109(10):1767-79
pubmed: 12359593
Ophthalmology. 2009 Nov;116(11):2135-40
pubmed: 19744734
Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Jun;113(6):810-8
pubmed: 7540388
Ophthalmology. 1995 Oct;102(10):1450-60
pubmed: 9097791
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;96(1):21-3
pubmed: 21733918
Ophthalmology. 2015 Apr;122(4):822-32
pubmed: 25578255
Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug 18;8(4):846-8
pubmed: 26309891
Retina. 2009 Jun;29(6):723-31
pubmed: 19516114
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jul;49(7):3115-20
pubmed: 18408176
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr;143(4):566-83
pubmed: 17386270
Neuropsychobiology. 2009;59(4):227-33
pubmed: 19571597
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994 Nov;35(12):3974-9
pubmed: 7525506
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;96(1):14-20
pubmed: 21791509
Ophthalmology. 2008 Dec;115(12):2199-205
pubmed: 18930553
Ophthalmology. 2012 Dec;119(12):2537-48
pubmed: 23084240
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;156(1):15-22.e1
pubmed: 23706500
Mol Vis. 2002 Apr 21;8:119-26
pubmed: 11979237