Evaluation of potential genetic and chemical markers for Scots pine tolerance against Heterobasidion annosum infection.


Journal

Planta
ISSN: 1432-2048
Titre abrégé: Planta
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 1250576

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Historique:
received: 30 05 2019
accepted: 27 08 2019
pubmed: 6 9 2019
medline: 10 3 2020
entrez: 6 9 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Two terpene compounds and four genes were identified as potential biomarkers for further evaluation for Scots pine susceptibility or tolerance against Heterobasidion annosum. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) is one of the main sources of timber in the boreal zone of Eurasia. Commercial pine plantations are vulnerable to root and butt rot disease caused by the fungus Heterobasidion annosum. The pathogen affects host growth rate, causes higher mortality and decreases in timber quality, resulting in considerable economic losses to forest owners. Genetic and biochemical factors contributing to Scots pine tolerance against H. annosum infection are not well understood. We assessed the predictive values of a set of potential genetic and chemical markers in a field experiment. We determined the expression levels of 25 genes and the concentrations of 36 terpenoid compounds in needles of 16 Scots pine trees randomly selected from a natural population prior to artificial infection. Stems of the same trees were artificially inoculated with H. annosum, and the length of necrotic lesions was documented 5 months post inoculation. Higher expression level of four genes included in our analysis and encoding predicted α-pinene synthase (two genes), geranyl diphosphate synthase (GPPS), and metacaspase 5 (MC5), could be associated with trees exhibiting increased levels of necrotic lesion formation in response to fungal inoculation. In contrast, concentrations of two terpenoid compounds, β-caryophyllene and α-humulene, showed significant negative correlations with the lesion size. Further studies with larger sample size will help to elucidate new biomarkers or clarify the potential of the evaluated markers for use in Scots pine disease resistance breeding programs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31485774
doi: 10.1007/s00425-019-03270-8
pii: 10.1007/s00425-019-03270-8
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0
Genetic Markers 0
Terpenes 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1881-1895

Subventions

Organisme : Academy of Finland
ID : 307580
Organisme : Academy of Finland
ID : 278424

Références

J Chem Ecol. 2011 Sep;37(9):1002-12
pubmed: 21845434
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011 Mar;75(3):414-29
pubmed: 21204866
Nature. 2013 May 30;497(7451):579-84
pubmed: 23698360
BMC Plant Biol. 2013 May 16;13:80
pubmed: 23679205
New Phytol. 2006;170(4):657-75
pubmed: 16684230
Planta. 2008 Aug;228(3):427-38
pubmed: 18493792
J Chem Ecol. 2002 Jan;28(1):211-28
pubmed: 11868675
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jun 12;9:793
pubmed: 29946332
J Chem Ecol. 1996 May;22(5):1037-50
pubmed: 24227623
J Biol Chem. 2014 Aug 22;289(34):23859-69
pubmed: 25016016
J Chem Ecol. 2006 Jul;32(7):1431-43
pubmed: 16724271
New Phytol. 2015 Dec;208(4):1149-56
pubmed: 26192091
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2013;51:221-44
pubmed: 23682916
Phytochemistry. 2010 Jun;71(8-9):909-17
pubmed: 20394954
J Chem Ecol. 2007 Mar;33(3):477-91
pubmed: 17268824
New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(1):70-83
pubmed: 30575972
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2013;51:39-59
pubmed: 23642002
New Phytol. 2005 Aug;167(2):353-75
pubmed: 15998390
Planta. 2014 Mar;239(3):717-33
pubmed: 24366684
Mol Plant Pathol. 2018 Feb 1;:null
pubmed: 29388309
Plant Mol Biol. 2003 Jan;51(1):119-33
pubmed: 12602896
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
pubmed: 11846609
Tree Physiol. 2018 Oct 1;38(10):1461-1475
pubmed: 29648619
J Chem Ecol. 2004 Jan;30(1):125-41
pubmed: 15074661
BMC Plant Biol. 2011 Nov 08;11:154
pubmed: 22067529
Mol Plant Pathol. 2005 Jul 1;6(4):395-409
pubmed: 20565666
BMC Genomics. 2015 May 06;16:352
pubmed: 25943104
Tree Physiol. 2012 Jul;32(7):867-79
pubmed: 22718525

Auteurs

Mukrimin Mukrimin (M)

Department of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, P.O. Box 27, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, Hasanuddin University, Jln. Perintis Kemerdekaan Km. 10, 90245, Makassar, Indonesia.

Andriy Kovalchuk (A)

Department of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, P.O. Box 27, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.

Rajendra P Ghimire (RP)

Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Kuopio Campus, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.

Minna Kivimäenpää (M)

Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Kuopio Campus, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.

Hui Sun (H)

Department of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, P.O. Box 27, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Collaborative Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.

Jarmo K Holopainen (JK)

Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Kuopio Campus, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.

Fred O Asiegbu (FO)

Department of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, P.O. Box 27, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. fred.asiegbu@helsinki.fi.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
C-Reactive Protein Humans Biomarkers Inflammation
Genome, Viral Ralstonia Composting Solanum lycopersicum Bacteriophages
Semiconductors Photosynthesis Polymers Carbon Dioxide Bacteria

Classifications MeSH